Regular Article
Higher Taxonomic Relationships among Extant Mammals Based on Morphology, with Selected Comparisons of Results from Molecular Data

https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1998.0520Get rights and content

Abstract

Until a few decades ago, phylogenetic relationships among placental orders were ambiguous and usually depicted to radiate as an unresolved “bush.” Resolution of this bush by various workers has been progressing slowly, but with promising results corroborated by nondental, dental, and molecular characters. In this study we continue to seek resolution. A total of 258 nondental and 2 dental characters was analyzed by PAUP and MacClade on 39 vertebrate taxa (3 reptiles, 1 nonmammalian therapsid, and 35 mammals; 20 of the mammals are extant and 15 are extinct) to study higher taxonomic relationships with emphasis on Placentalia (Eutheria). About two-thirds of the characters are osteological, the rest concern soft tissues, including myological but excluding molecular characters (most are our data, the rest are from the literature). Cladistic analysis included all 39 taxa (fossil taxa help to evaluate polarities of characters) and all characters were given equal weight. Extant Mammalia are divided into Prototheria and Theria, the latter into Marsupialia and Placentalia. Placentalia comprises Xenarthra and Epitheria. Within Epitheria, Lipotyphla and Preptotheria (emended) are sister-taxa. Preptotherian taxa group into: ungulate-related taxa and various nonungulates. The former include Carnivora, Pholidota, Tubulidentata, Artiodactyla, Cetacea, Perissodactyla, Hyracoidea, Proboscidea, and Sirenia. A possible association to embrace Lagomorpha, Rodentia, Macroscelidea, Scandentia, Primates, Chiroptera, and Dermoptera is suggested. Significant differences between our findings and those of recent investigators include the dissociation of Pholidota from Xenarthra and the plesiomorphous position of Lipotyphla within Epitheria. Congruence between morphological and molecular results is closer than previously reported.

References (92)

  • J.D. Archibald

    Fossil evidence for a late Cretaceous origin of “hoofed” mammals

    Science

    (1996)
  • W.J. Bailey et al.

    Rejection of the “flying primate” hypothesis by phylogenetic evidence from the ϵ-globin gene

    Science

    (1992)
  • K.C. Beard

    Phylogenetic systematics of the Primatomorpha, with special reference to Dermoptera

    Mammal Phylogeny: Placentals

    (1993)
  • K. Bremer

    The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction

    Evolution

    (1988)
  • R. Broom

    On the milk dentition ofOrycteropus

    Ann. South African Museum

    (1909)
  • R. Broom

    On the organ of Jacobson inOrycteropus

    Proc. Zool. Soc. London

    (1909)
  • P.M. Butler

    The skull ofIctops

    Proc. Zool. Soc. London

    (1956)
  • J. Czelusniak et al.

    Perspectives from amino acid and nucleotide sequences on cladistic relationships among higher taxa of Eutheria

  • W.W. de Jong et al.

    Eye lens crystallins and the phylogeny of placental orders: evidence for a macroscelid-paenungulate clade

  • W.W. de Jong et al.

    Protein sequence analysis applied to xenarthran and pholidote phylogeny

  • D.P. Domning

    A phylogenetic analysis of the Sirenia

  • F.H. Edgeworth

    On the development and morphology of the mandibular and hyoid muscles of mammals

    Quart. J. Microsc. Sci.

    (1914)
  • John F. Eisenberg

    The Mammalian Radiations: an Analysis of Trends in Evolution, Adaptation, and Behavior

    (1981)
  • R.J. Emry

    A North American Oligocene pangolin and other additions to the Pholidota

    Bull. Am. Museum Natural History

    (1970)
  • J. Felsenstein

    Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap

    Evolution

    (1985)
  • M.S. Fischer

    Hyracoids, the sister-group of perissodactyls

  • M.S. Fischer et al.

    The interrelation between Proboscidea, Sirenia, Hyracoidea, and Mesaxonia: The morphological evidence

  • P.L. Forey et al.

    Cladistics: A Practical Course in Systematics

    (1992)
  • T.J. Gaudin et al.

    Reexamination of the morphological evidence for the cohort Epitheria (Mammalian, Eutheria)

    J. Mammal. Evol.

    (1996)
  • E. Gheerbrant et al.

    A Palaeocene proboscidean from Morocco

    Nature

    (1996)
  • T. Gill

    Arrangement of the families of mammals with analytical tables

    Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections

    (1872)
  • M. Goodman et al.

    Phylogeny of primates and other eutherian orders: a cladistic analysis using amino acid and nucleotide sequence data

    Cladistics

    (1985)
  • D. Graur et al.

    Evolutionary affinities of the order Perissodactyla and the phylogenetic status of the superordinal taxa Ungulata and Altungulata

    Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.

    (1997)
  • W.K. Gregory

    The orders of mammals

    Bull. Am. Museum Natural History

    (1910)
  • E. Haeckel

    Generalle Morphologie der Organismen, I

    (1866)
  • E. Haeckel

    Generalle Morphologie der Organismen, II

    (1866)
  • W.C.O. Hill

    Evolutionary Biology of the Primates

    (1972)
  • R.L. Honeycutt et al.

    Higher-level systematics of eutherian mammals: An assessment of molecular characters and phylogenetic hypotheses

    Annu. Rev. Ecol. Systemat.

    (1993)
  • D.M. Irwin et al.

    Limitations of molecular methods for establishing the phylogeny of mammals, with special reference to the position of elephants

  • R.P.S. Jefferies

    The origin of chordates—A methodological essay

  • W.E. Le Gros Clark et al.

    A monograph ofOrycteropus afer

    Proc. Zool. Soc. London

    (1926)
  • C. Li et al.

    New cranial and postcranial evidence for the affinities of the Eurymylids (Rodentia) and Mimotonids (Lagomorpha)

  • C. Li et al.

    The origin of rodents and lagomorphs

  • C. Linnaeus

    Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species cum Caracteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis

    (1758)
  • W.P. Luckett

    The suggested evolutionary relationships and classification of tree shrews

  • Z. Luo

    Sister-group relationships of mammals and transformations of diagnostic mammalian characters

  • Z. Luo et al.

    Evolutionary origins of the mammalian promontorium and cochlea

    J. Vertebr. Paleontol.

    (1995)
  • R.D.E. MacPhee

    Morphology, adaptations, and relationships ofPlesiorycteropus,

    Bull. Am. Museum Natural History

    (1994)
  • W.P. Maddison et al.

    MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Version 3.0

    (1992)
  • M.C. McKenna

    New evidence against tupaioid affinities of the mammalian family Anagalidae

    Am. Museum Novitates

    (1963)
  • M.C. McKenna

    The origin and early differentiation of therian mammals

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (1969)
  • M.C. McKenna

    Toward a phylogenetic classification of the Mammalia

  • M.C. McKenna

    Molecular and morphological analysis of high-level mammalian interrelationships

  • M.C. McKenna

    The alpha crystallin A chain of the eye lens and mammalian phylogeny

    Ann. Zool. Fennici

    (1992)
  • M.C. McKenna et al.

    Classification of Mammals above the Species Level

    (1997)
  • Cited by (193)

    • A comparative SEM study of the guard hair architecture in subterranean moles (Talpidae, Soricomorpha), golden moles (Chrysochloridae, Afrosoricidae), and silvery mole-rats (Bathyergidae, Rodentia)

      2022, Zoologischer Anzeiger
      Citation Excerpt :

      The silvery mole-rat Heliophobius argenteocinereus (Bathyergidae, Rodentia), a representative of subterranean rodents whose lifestyle has been sufficiently well studied (Jarvis & Sale 1971; Nowak 1999; Bennett & Faulkes 2000; Šumbera et al., 2003; 2007; Woods & Kilpatrick 2005; Malewski et al., 2018), was also used for comparison. The studied species belong to phylogenetically distant orders, which was shown at the level of morphology and molecular phylogenetics (Shoshani & McKenna 1998). That is why the similarity in the structure of their pelage can be defined as convergent, due to adaptation to an underground lifestyle.

    • Diverse phylogenomic datasets uncover a concordant scenario of laurasiatherian interordinal relationships

      2021, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
      Citation Excerpt :

      The phylogenetic relationships within Laurasiatheria have been addressed using extensive DNA sequences, resulting in the proposals of many conflicting hypotheses for these six orders. Currently, with the exception of a consensus for the earliest divergence of Eulipotyphla and the grouping of Carnivora and Pholidota (the Ferae, Shoshani and McKenna, 1998), the relationships among the other laurasiatherian orders remains uncertain. Two of the most popular hypotheses have been proposed regarding which order is the second-branching laurasiatherian lineage, i.e., the “Fereuungulata” hypothesis supporting the second-diverging Chiroptera (Doronina et al., 2017; Emerling et al., 2015; Esselstyn et al., 2017; Foley et al., 2016; Gatesy et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2017; Madsen et al., 2001; Murphy et al., 2001a,b, 2004; Scally et al., 2001; Song et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2012) (Fig. 1a-c) and the “Pegasoferae” hypothesis supporting the second-diverging Cetartiodactyla (dos Reis et al., 2012; Lartillot, 2013; McCormack et al., 2012; Murphy et al., 2007; Nishihara et al., 2006; Romiguier et al., 2010; Seim et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2011) (Fig. 1d and e).

    • Mammalian Evolution: The Phylogenetics Story

      2020, Evolutionary Neuroscience
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    F. S. SzalayM. J. NovacekM. C. McKenna

    View full text