Regular Article
Constraints-based models: Regulation of Gene Expression Reduces the Steady-state Solution Space

https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2003.3071Get rights and content

Abstract

Constraints-based models have been effectively used to analyse, interpret, and predict the function of reconstructed genome-scale metabolic models. The first generation of these models used “hard” non-adjustable constraints associated with network connectivity, irreversibility of metabolic reactions, and maximal flux capacities. These constraints restrict the allowable behaviors of a network to a convex mathematical solution space whose edges are extreme pathways that can be used to characterize the optimal performance of a network under a stated performance criterion. The development of a second generation of constraints-based models by incorporating constraints associated with regulation of gene expression was described in a companion paper published in this journal, using flux-balance analysis to generate time courses of growth and by-product secretion using a skeleton representation of core metabolism. The imposition of these additional restrictions prevents the use of a subset of the extreme pathways that are derived from the “hard” constraints, thus reducing the solution space and restricting allowable network functions. Here, we examine the reduction of the solution space due to regulatory constraints using extreme pathway analysis. The imposition of environmental conditions and regulatory mechanisms sharply reduces the number of active extreme pathways. This approach is demonstrated for the skeleton system mentioned above, which has 80 extreme pathways. As regulatory constraints are applied to the system, the number of feasible extreme pathways is reduced to between 26 and 2 extreme pathways, a reduction of between 67.5 and 97.5%. The method developed here provides a way to interpret how regulatory mechanisms are used to constrain network functions and produce a small range of physiologically meaningful behaviors from all allowable network functions.

References (40)

  • J.E. BAILEY

    Complex biology with no parameters

    Nature Biotechnol.

    (2001)
  • H.P.J. BONARIUS et al.

    Flux analysis of underdetermined metabolic networks: the quest for the missing constraints

    Trends Biotechnol.

    (1997)
  • M.W. COVERT et al.

    Metabolic Modeling of Microbial Strains in silico

    Trends Biochem. Sci.

    (2001)
  • COVERT, M. W. SCHILLING, C. H. PALSSON, B. O. 2001b, Regulation of gene expression in flux balance models of...
  • J. EDWARDS et al.

    Properties of the Haemophilus influenzae Rd metabolic genotype

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • J.S. EDWARDS et al.

    The E. coli MG1655 in silico metabolic genotype: its definition, characteristics, and capabilities

    Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.

    (2000)
  • J.S. EDWARDS et al.

    Metabolic flux balance analysis

  • J.S. EDWARDS et al.

    In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data

    Nature Biotechnol.

    (2001)
  • J.S. EDWARDS et al.

    Characterizing the metabolic phenotype: a pheno-type phase plane analysis

    Biotechnol. Bioeng.

    (2002)
  • D. FELL

    Understanding the Control of Metabolism

    (1996)
  • A.K. GOMBERT et al.

    Mathematical model-ling of metabolism

    Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.

    (2000)
  • R. HEINRICH et al.

    The Regulation of Cellular Systems

    (1996)
  • S.A. KAUFFMAN

    The Origins of Order

    (1993)
  • M. KAUFMAN et al.

    Towards a logical analysis of the immune response

    J. Theor. Biol.

    (1985)
  • D.S. KOMPALA et al.

    Investigation of Bacterial Growth on Mixed Substrates. Experimental Evaluation of Cybernetic Models

    Biotechnol. Bioeng.

    (1986)
  • B. LEE et al.

    Incorporating qualitative knowledge in enzyme kinetic models using fuzzy logic

    Biotechnol. Bioeng.

    (1999)
  • H.H. MCADAMS et al.

    Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression

    Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (1997)
  • H.H. MCADAMS et al.

    Simulation of prokaryotic genetic circuits

    Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.

    (1998)
  • H.H. MCADAMS et al.

    It's a noisy business! Genetic regulation at the nanomolar scale

    Trends Genet.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (137)

    • Protocol for condition-dependent metabolite yield prediction using the TRIMER pipeline

      2022, STAR Protocols
      Citation Excerpt :

      For more accurate and robust prediction of target metabolic behavior under different conditions or contexts (e.g., for mutant strains due to gene deletions in metabolic engineering), these metabolic network models can also be integrated with a set of genetic regulatory rules, which can be modeled as a transcriptional regulatory network involving transcription factors (TFs) that may regulate metabolic reactions. Transcriptional regulation is often integrated via “transcriptional regulatory constraints” with various heuristics in metabolic network models for flux predictions (Covert and Palsson, 2003; Shlomi et al., 2007; Covert et al., 2008). With the advent of high-throughput profiling technologies, genome-scale gene expression profiles can be easily obtained to help infer genetic regulatory rules.

    • TRIMER: Transcription Regulation Integrated with Metabolic Regulation

      2021, iScience
      Citation Excerpt :

      For more accurate and robust prediction of target metabolic behavior under different conditions or contexts, not only metabolic reactions but also the integration of genetic regulatory relationships involving transcription factors (TFs) that may regulate metabolic reactions, should be appropriately modeled. Due to the increasing computational complexity when considering multiple types of biomolecules in one computational system model, often transcription regulation has been integrated via “transcriptional regulatory constraints” with various heuristics for flux-balance analysis (FBA) of metabolic networks (Covert and Palsson, 2003; Shlomi et al., 2007; Covert et al., 2008; Shlomi et al., 2008; Fendt et al., 2010; Machado and Herrgård, 2014; Reiss et al., 2015; Reed, 2017; Motamedian et al., 2017; Yu and Blair, 2019). Many of these computational tools were often only validated for selected model organisms with curated data and network models.

    • Metabolomics and flux balance analysis

      2021, Bioinformatics: Methods and Applications
    • Recent advances in constraint and machine learning-based metabolic modeling by leveraging stoichiometric balances, thermodynamic feasibility and kinetic law formalisms

      2021, Metabolic Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      SGL is then used to select a sparse set of genes that is the best predictor of a given phenotype. Phenotype prediction can be further enhanced by adding Boolean type constraints to GSM models to help incorporate regulation (Covert and Palsson, 2003) (e.g., under aerobic or anaerobic conditions), as indicated in Fig. 1(b). However, reconstructing a gene regulatory network (GRN) from high-throughput data remains challenging, as elucidated by the DREAM project for over 30 network inferences methods applied to E. coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Staphylococcus aureus (Marbach et al., 2012).

    • Computational tools in the assistance of personalized healthcare

      2018, Computer Aided Chemical Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such models can be transformed into stoichiometric representations, where the matrices represent the biological constraints associated with the studied system (e.g., genetic and physicochemical properties), while the solution space is defined by data resulting from gene expression and proteomic studies (Blazier and Papin, 2012). Constrained-based models are usually less computationally expensive compared to kinetic models and they are characterized by a decreased number of parameters (Covert and Palsson, 2003). In addition, there is a variety of software tools that facilitate the design of the metabolic network of interest (Lewis and Abdel-Haleem, 2013; Marinković and Orešič, 2016).

    • Advances in the integration of transcriptional regulatory information into genome-scale metabolic models

      2016, BioSystems
      Citation Excerpt :

      FBA predicts the fluxes of reactions and the biomass production rate without accounting for the regulatory constraints that are crucial in determining the presence and activity of enzymes in an environmental condition (Orth et al., 2010). This omission of regulatory constraints is an important limitation of FBA (Covert and Palsson, 2002, 2003; Åkesson et al., 2004) and can partly explain incorrect predictions by this method on gene essentiality (Covert et al., 2004) and gene interactions (Szappanos et al., 2011). The metabolic state of a cell in a given condition is governed by the expression of metabolic genes encoding enzymes.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-858-534-5668; fax: +1-858-822-3120.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (B.O. Palsson).

    View full text