Regular Article
Group-Based Dominance and Opposition to Equality as Independent Predictors of Self-Esteem, Ethnocentrism, and Social Policy Attitudes among African Americans and European Americans,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1403Get rights and content

Abstract

Adopting a multidimensional approach to the measurement and conceptualization of “social dominance orientation” (Pratto, Sidanius, Stallworth, & Malle, 1994), we argue for the existence of two related ideological factors, one that measures general opposition to equality (OEQ) and another that measures support for group-based dominance (GBD). Because of status differences between European and African Americans, it was hypothesized that the two factors would be differentially related to each other and to variables of psychological well-being, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes. Integrating results from four studies involving 1675 research participants, we found that (a) a correlated two-factor solution of the 16-item SDO scale provided a better comparative fit than a one-factor solution; (b) the two factors were more highly intercorrelated for European American than for African American respondents; (c) OEQ was related negatively to self-esteem and ethnocentrism for African Americans, but it was related positively to self-esteem and ethnocentrism for European Americans; (d) GBD related positively to ethnocentrism for both groups; (e) attitudes toward conservative social policy and affirmative action were predicted more by OEQ than by GBD for both groups; (f) the relation between OEQ and neuroticism was positive for African Americans but negative for European Americans, whereas the relation between GBD and neuroticism was positive for European Americans but negative for African Americans; and (g) economic system justification was related to OEQ but not GBD, and it also predicted political conservatism and racial attitudes.

References (30)

  • S.L. Bem et al.

    Case study of a nonconscious ideology: Training the woman to know her place

  • P. Bentler

    EQS Structural Equations Program Manual

    (1995)
  • L. Bobo et al.

    Opposition to race-targeting: Self-interest, stratification ideology, or racial attitudes?

    American Sociological Review

    (1993)
  • J. Cohen

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

    (1987)
  • P.T. Costa et al.

    Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual

    (1992)
  • J. Crocker et al.

    Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma

    Psychological Review

    (1989)
  • L. Dumont

    Homo hierarchicus: The caste system and its implications

    (1970)
  • R. Eyerman et al.

    Social movements: A cognitive approach

    (1991)
  • S. Fein et al.

    Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through negative evaluations of others

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1997)
  • J.L. Hochschild

    The strange career of affirmative action

    Ohio State Law Journal

    (1998)
  • G. Hofstede

    Culture’s consequences

    (1984)
  • J.T. Jost

    Negative illusions: Conceptual clarification and psychological evidence concerning false consciousness

    Political Psychology

    (1995)
  • J.T. Jost et al.

    The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness

    British Journal of Social Psychology

    (1994)
  • J.T. Jost et al.

    Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups

    Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

    (2000)
  • Cited by (0)

    Order of authorship is alphabetical; contributions to this work were equal and shared. Data from Studies 1 and 2 were presented at the 1997 annual convention of the American Psychological Society in Washington, DC. We thank Chris Crandall, Jenny Crocker, Shana Levin, Felicia Pratto, and Jim Sidanius for their comments on earlier versions of this article.

    ☆☆

    Address correspondence and reprint requests to John T. Jost, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5015, e-mail: [email protected], or to Erik P. Thompson, Department of Psychology, Washington University, One Brookings Drive/Box 1125, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, e-mail: [email protected].

    View full text