Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Pain control in first trimester surgical abortion

This is not the most recent version

Collapse all Expand all

Abstract

available in

Background

First trimester abortions especially cervical dilation and suction aspiration are associated with pain, despite various methods of pain control.

Objectives

Compare different methods of pain control during first trimester surgical abortion.

Search methods

We searched multiple electronic databases with the appropriate key words, as well as reference lists of articles, and contacted professionals to seek other trials.

Selection criteria

Randomized controlled trials comparing methods of pain control in first trimester surgical abortion at less than 14 weeks gestational age using electric or manual suction aspiration. Outcomes included intra‐ and postoperative pain, side effects, recovery measures and satisfaction.

Data collection and analysis

Two reviewers independently extracted data. Meta‐analysis results are expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) or Peto Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Main results

We included forty studies with 5131 participants. Due to heterogeneity we divided studies into 7 groups:

Local anesthesia: Data was insufficient to show a clear benefit of a paracervical block (PCB) compared to no PCB or a PCB with bacteriostatic saline. Pain scores during dilation and aspiration were improved with deep injection (WMD ‐1.64 95% CI ‐3.21 to ‐0.08; WMD 1.00 95% CI 1.09 to 0.91), and with adding a 4% intrauterine lidocaine infusion (WMD ‐2.0 95% CI ‐3.29 to ‐0.71, WMD ‐2.8 95% CI ‐3.95 to ‐1.65 with dilation and aspiration respectively).

PCB with premedication: Ibuprofen and naproxen resulted in small reduction of intra‐ and post‐operative pain.

Analgesia: Diclofenac‐sodium did not reduce pain.

Conscious sedation: The addition of conscious intravenous sedation using diazepam and fentanyl to PCB decreased procedural pain.

General anesthesia (GA): Conscious sedation increased intraoperative but decreased postoperative pain compared to GA (Peto OR 14.77 95% CI 4.91 to 44.38, and Peto OR 7.47 95% CI 2.2 to 25.36 for dilation and aspiration respectively, and WMD 1.00 95% CI 1.77 to 0.23 postoperatively). Inhalation anesthetics are associated with increased blood loss (p<0.001).

GA with premedication: The COX 2 inhibitor etoricoxib, the non‐selective COX inhibitors lornoxicam, diclofenac and ketorolac IM, and the opioid nalbuphine were improved postoperative pain.

Non‐pharmacological intervention: Listening to music decreased procedural pain.

No major complication was observed.

Authors' conclusions

Conscious sedation, GA and some non‐pharmacological interventions decreased procedural and postoperative pain, while being safe and satisfactory to patients. Data on the widely used PCB is inadequate to support its use, and it needs to be further studied to determine any benefit.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Plain language summary

available in

Pain control in first trimester surgical abortion.

Multiple methods of pain control in first trimester surgical abortion at less than 14 weeks gestational age using electric or manual suction aspiration are available, and appear both safe and effective. Pain control methods can be divided in local anesthesia, conscious sedation, general anesthesia and non‐pharmacological methods. Data to support the benefit of the widely used local aneathetic is inadequate. While general anesthesia achieved complete pain control during the procedure, other forms of anesthesia such as conscious sedation with a paracervical block improved postoperative pain control.