Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Protocol - Intervention

Probiotics for preventing preterm labour

This is not the most recent version

Collapse all Expand all

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:

To evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of using probiotics for preventing preterm labour and birth.

Background

Preterm birth
Preterm birth defined as birth before 37 complete weeks of gestation causes 60% to 80% of neonatal deaths (Cram 2002; Klein 2004; Leitich 2003; Yost 2000). Other important adverse outcomes of preterm birth include respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular haemorrhage, leukomalacia, necrotizing enterocolitis, and prolonged hospitalisation (McGregor 1997). Survivors can suffer life‐long complications including cerebral palsy, blindness, and deafness (Kiss 2004; McGregor 1997). The direct and indirect costs of prematurity can be immense (McGregor 1997). The lifetime costs per preterm birth (baby's birthweight less than 2500 grams) have been estimated at £511,614 ($941,640; EUR 766,339) (Kiss 2004; Petrou 2000).

Since 1970, the incidence of preterm deliveries in developed countries has increased from 9% to 11%. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes and spontaneous preterm labour accounts for approximately 80% of preterm deliveries; the remaining 20% are elective deliveries for maternal or fetal reasons (for example, eclampsia) (Yost 2000).

Prematurity and infection
The risk of preterm labour in the presence of maternal infection is thought to be 30% to 50% (Chaim 1997; Cram 2002; Crowther 2005; Kiss 2004; Klein 2004; Reid 2003a; Romero 2002; VIPSG 1995). Urogenital infections, including urinary tract infections, bacterial vaginosis, and yeast vaginitis, affect an estimated one billion women in the world annually (Reid 2001). Urogenital infections have emerged in the last 20 years as an important cause of preterm labour. In fact, it is the only pathological process for which a firm causal link with preterm labour has been established (Chaim 1997; Kiss 2004; Leitich 2003; McGregor 1997; Reid 2001; Reid 2003b; Romero 2002; VIPSG 1995).

Bacterial vaginosis
Bacterial vaginosis is a clinical syndrome of unknown aetiology characterized by an overgrowth of vaginal anaerobes and variable degrees of depletion of the Lactobacilli population (Andreu 2004; Howe 1999; Iannacchione 2004; Reid 2003a; Ugwumadu 1999). In the western world bacterial vaginosis is the leading cause of vaginal discharge (Ugwumadu 1999). Bacterial vaginosis is common in pregnant women with a prevalence of 10% to 20% (Kiss 2004; Reid 2001; Sieber 1998). Adequate treatment in early stages of pregnancy may lead to reduction of prematurity (Howe 1999; Kiss 2004; McGregor 1997; Reid 2001; Romero 2002). When bacterial vaginosis develops, the concentration of many anaerobic or facultative anaerobic species increases up to a thousand fold. These species include Gardnerella vaginalis, Mobiluncus spp, Bacteroides spp, Mycoplasma hominis, and Peptostreptococcus spp (Chaim 1997; Howe 1999; Iannacchione 2004; Leitich 2003; Reid 2003a). The clinical diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis is based on the finding of at least three of the following four signs:
(1) vaginal PH greater than 4.7;
(2) grey homogenous vaginal discharge;
(3) presence of clue cells in a wet mount preparation of vaginal fluid;
(4) positive amine test in which a fishy odour is released after the addition of 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) to the vaginal fluid (Chaim 1997; Cram 2002; McDonald 2005; Reid 2003a; Reid 2003c; Riggs 2004; Sieber 1998).

Bacterial vaginosis is more likely to be triggered by the decreasing number of Lactobacilli in the vaginal flora leading to relative predominance of pathological organisms (Sieber 1998). These organisms utilize ketoacids to produce amines and virulence factors including cytotoxins, sialidases, mucinases, and collagenases causing epithelial cell damage and creating the typical bacterial vaginosis discharge (Ugwumadu 1999).

Pathogenesis of ascending infection
The most common pathway for urogenital pathogens to cause preterm labour is the ascending route (McGregor 1997; Romero 2002). The presence of sialidases facilitates bacterial attachment and the breakdown of mucin, while mucinases assist microbial ascent into uterine tissues (Howe 1999; Klein 2004; McGregor 1997). Proteolytic enzymes may act directly on cervical collagen and fetal membrane leading to premature cervical ripening and weakening of the fetal membranes with subsequent preterm premature rupture of the membranes (McGregor 1997). Micro‐organisms may stimulate the host monocytes and macrophages resulting in the production of phospholipase A2. A2 is an enzyme that liberates arachidonic acid from the phospholipids of the membranes leading to the synthesis of prostaglandins E2 and F2a by the placental membranes (Bejar 1981; Chaim 1997; Reid 2004; Riggs 2004; Yost 2000). Similarly, protease toxins activate the deciduas and fetal membranes to produce cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor, interleukin (IL1a, IL1b, IL6, IL8), and granulocyte‐macrophage colony stimulating factor. In response to the activation of local inflammatory reaction, prostaglandins synthesis and release are stimulated (Cram 2002; Klein 2004; Reid 2002a; Riggs 2004; Ugwumadu 1999), which is known to stimulate uterine contractions (Riggs 2004).

Lactobacilli
Lactobacilli are gram positive, catalase negative, non‐sporing rods that dominate vaginal flora (Sieber 1998). Types of Lactobacilli found in the vaginal flora include: Lactobacillus acidophilus, fermentum, crispatus, and jensenii (Reid 2003a). The human vagina is lined by stratified squamous non‐keratinized epithelium. The surface is multilayered and the middle and superficial layers contains glycogen which is set free by the breakdown of superficial cells. Free glycogen is fermented by epithelial cells and by Lactobacilli producing lactic acid, and hydrogen peroxide (Andreu 2004; Reid 2002b; Reid 2003d; Sieber 1998). The presence and dominance of Lactobacillus in the vagina is associated with reduced risk of bacterial vaginosis and urinary tract infection (Reid 2002b). Women who have hydrogen peroxide producing strains of Lactobacilli have a 4% prevalence rate of bacterial vaginosis compared with 32% in women colonized by non‐hydrogen peroxide producing strains and 56% in those without Lactobacilli (Ugwumadu 1999). The mechanism includes blocking pathogen attachment to vaginal epithelium, and producing hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and bacteriocins that inhibits pathogen multiplication (Andreu 2004; Reid 2003a; Riggs 2004; Sieber 1998; Wilks 2004).

Certain Lactobacillus strains are able to colonize the vagina following vaginal suppository use (for example, Vivag®) and may reduce the risk of urogenital infections, and it was suggested that it reduces infant mortality and preterm labour (Reid 2003b; Reid 2003c; Reid 2003d). This raises the question as to whether restoration of Lactobacilli by probiotic therapy can restore the normal flora and improve the chances of having a healthy term pregnancy (Reid 2003a).

Probiotics
Probiotics are defined as live micro‐organisms which when administered in an adequate amount confer a health benefit on the host (Andreu 2004; Elmer 2001; Reid 2003a; Reid 2003d). Probiotics have been shown to displace and kill pathogens and modulate the immune response by interfering with the inflammatory cascade that leads to preterm labour and delivery (Bengmark 2001; Reid 2003a). As yeast can co‐exist with Lactobacilli in the vagina, and few Lactobacillus strains inhibit yeast growth, it is unlikely that probiotics will cure yeast vaginitis. They are more likely to prevent recurrences by restoring the normal flora postantifungal treatment (Reid 2002a; Reid 2002b; Reid 2004). The actual mechanism of action of probiotics in the vagina has not been proven and is probably multifactorial. The production of lactic acid, bacteriocin, and hydrogen peroxide seems to be important and modulation of immunity is another possible mechanism (Reid 2004). The administration of these Lactobacilli by mouth or intravaginally, or both, (Reid 2003a; Reid 2004) has been shown to be safe and effective in reducing or treating, or both, urogenital infections (seeTable 1). The recommended dose, by whatever route of administration, is 109 to 1011 air‐dried or freeze‐dried bacteria (Andreu 2004; Elmer 2001; Reid 2003d).

Open in table viewer
Table 1. Commercially available probiotics

PROBIOTIC

FORM

ADMINISTRATiON

PRESCRIBED USE

Intrafresh

Vaginal pessaries

Vaginally

Bacterial vaginosis, yeast vaginitis

Cervagyn

Vaginal cream

Vaginally

Bacterial vaginosis, yeast vaginitis

Döderlein med

Vaginal capsules

Vaginally

Bacterial vaginosis, yeast vaginitis

GY‐Natren

Vaginal tablets

Vaginally

Bacterial vaginosis, yeast vaginitis

Vivag

Vaginal tablets

Vaginally

Bacterial vaginosis, yeast vaginitis

Yeast infection no more

Vaginal drops

To be added to tampons

Yeast vaginitis

Veganicity multi probiotic

Capsules

Orally

Yeast vaginitis

Acidophilus bifidus fos

Capsules

Orally

Yeast vaginitis, urinary tract infection

Primadophilus

Capsules

Orally

Yeast vaginitis, urinary tract infection, maintain intestinal integrity

Acidophilus bifidobacter fos

Capsules

Orally

Yeast vaginitis, urinary tract infection, maintain intestinal integrity

Acidophilus

Tablets

Orally

Vaginal infections, digestive disorders, other illnesses

Probiotic plus

Chewable tablet

Orally

Yeast vaginitis, improve digestion

Dairy health start system

Powder

Orally

Vaginal infections, urinary tract infection, digestive disorders

Threelac

Powder

Orally

Vaginal infections, urinary tract infection, digestive disorders

The current recommendation by the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA, USA) and the UK Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin is to screen and treat bacterial vaginosis in high‐risk pregnancies (Ugwumadu 1999). While antimicrobial agents are quite effective at providing clinical cure for bacterial infections, urogenital pathogen drug resistance is on the increase. Also, drugs have side‐effects including disruption of the protective vaginal flora which create an increased risk of recurrent infections (Reid 2001; Reid 2002b; Reid 2004; Romero 2002; Shennan 2006; Yost 2000). During pregnancy a local treatment restoring the normal acidity and vaginal flora without systemic effects may be preferable to any other treatment.

Objectives

To evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of using probiotics for preventing preterm labour and birth.

Methods

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

All randomised controlled trials assessing the prevention of preterm labour and birth through the use of probiotics to treat or prevent urogenital infections, or both.

Types of participants

Pregnant women and women planning pregnancy.

Types of interventions

Probiotics versus placebo, no treatment, antibiotics, or any other intervention to prevent preterm labour and birth.

Types of outcome measures

Primary outcomes
(1) Neonatal death or severe morbidity, or both
(2) Preterm birth before 34 weeks

Secondary outcomes
(1) Preterm labour
(2) Preterm birth before 28 weeks, before 32 weeks, and before 37 weeks
(3) Preterm labour requiring hospital admission
(4) Genital infection (bacterial vaginosis, yeast infection)
(5) Urinary tract infection
(6) Maternal side‐effects
(7) Women's experiences and views

Search methods for identification of studies

We will contact the Trials Search Co‐ordinator to search the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register.

The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register is maintained by the Trials Search Co‐ordinator and contains trials identified from:
(1) quarterly searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL);
(2) monthly searches of MEDLINE;
(3) hand searches of 30 journals and the proceedings of major conferences;
(4) weekly current awareness search of a further 37 journals.

Details of the search strategies for CENTRAL and MEDLINE, the list of hand searched journals and conference proceedings, and the list of journals reviewed via the current awareness service can be found in the 'Search strategies for identification of studies' section within the editorial information about the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group.

Trials identified through the searching activities described above are given a code (or codes) depending on the topic. The codes are linked to review topics. The Trials Search Co‐ordinator searches the register for each review using these codes rather than keywords.

Data collection and analysis

Selection of studies
We will assess for inclusion all potential studies identified as a result of the search strategy. We will resolve any disagreement through discussion.

Data extraction and management
We will design a form to extract data. Two authors will extract the data using the agreed form. We will resolve discrepancies through discussion. We will use the Review Manager Software (RevMan 2003) to double enter all the data. When information regarding any of the above is unclear, we will attempt to contact authors of the original reports to provide further details.

Assessment of methodological quality of included studies
We will assess the validity of each study using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook (Higgins 2005). Methods used for generation of the randomisation sequence will be described for each trial.

(1) Selection bias
We will assign a quality score for each trial, using the following criteria:
(A) adequate concealment of allocation: such as telephone randomisation, consecutively‐numbered sealed opaque envelopes;
(B) unclear whether adequate concealment of allocation: such as list or table used, sealed envelopes, or study does not report any concealment approach;
(C) inadequate concealment of allocation: such as open list of random‐number tables, use of case record numbers, dates of birth or days of the week.

(2 ) Attrition bias (loss of participants, for example, withdrawals, dropouts, protocol deviations)
We will assess completeness to follow up using the following criteria:
(A) less than 5% loss of participants;
(B) 5% to 9.9% loss of participants;
(C) 10% to 19.9% loss of participants;
(D) more than 20% loss of participants.

(3) Performance bias (blinding of participants, researchers and outcome assessment)
We will assess blinding using the following criteria:
(A) blinding of participants (yes/no/unclear);
(B) blinding of caregiver (yes/no/unclear);
(C) blinding of outcome assessment (yes/no/unclear).

Measures of treatment effect
We will carry out a statistical analysis using the Review Manager Software (RevMan 2003). We will use fixed‐effect meta‐analysis for combining data in the absence of significant heterogeneity. If heterogeneity is found this will be explored by sensitivity analysis followed by random‐effects analysis if required. For dichotomous data, we will present results as summary relative risk with 95% confidence intervals. For continuous data, we will use the weighted mean difference if outcomes are measured in the same way between trials. We will use the standardised mean difference to combine trials that measure the same outcome, but use different methods. If there is evidence of skewness, this will be reported.

Unit of analysis issues
We will include cluster‐randomised trials in the analysis along with individually randomised trials. Their sample size will be adjusted (Gates 2005) using an estimate of the intracluster correlation co‐efficient (ICC) derived from the trial (if possible), or from another source. If ICC's from other sources are used, this will be reported and sensitivity analysis will be conducted to investigate the effect of variation in the ICC. If we identify both cluster and individually randomised trials, we plan to synthesise the relevant information. We will consider it reasonable to combine the results from both if there is little heterogeneity between the study designs and the interaction between the effect of intervention and the choice of randomisation unit is considered to be unlikely. We will also acknowledge heterogeneity in the randomisation unit and perform a separate meta‐analysis. Therefore the meta‐analysis will be performed in two parts as well.

Dealing with missing data
We will analyse data on all participants with available data in the group to which they are allocated, regardless of whether or not they received the allocated intervention. If in the original reports participants are not analysed in the group to which they where randomised, and there is sufficient information in the trial report, or if the necessary information is obtained from the trial authors, we will attempt to restore them to the correct group.

Assessment of heterogeneity
We will apply tests of heterogeneity between trials, if appropriate, using the I² statistic. If we identify high levels of heterogeneity among the trials, (exceeding 50%), we will explore it by prespecified subgroup analysis and perform sensitivity analysis. A random‐effects meta‐analysis will be used as an overall summary if this is considered appropriate.

Subgroup analysis
We will conduct planned subgroup analysis classifying whole trials by interaction tests (Deeks 2001). The following subgroups will be analysed.
(1) Pregnant versus not pregnant.
(2) Confirmed infection versus no confirmed infection.
(3) Previous preterm labour versus no previous preterm labour.
(4) Long‐term treatment ( 7 days or more) versus short‐term treatment (less than 7 days).
(5) Oral versus vaginal administration of probiotics.

Sensitivity analysis
We will carry out sensitivity analysis to explore the effect of trial quality. This will involve analysis based on rating of selection bias and attrition bias.

Table 1. Commercially available probiotics

PROBIOTIC

FORM

ADMINISTRATiON

PRESCRIBED USE

Intrafresh

Vaginal pessaries

Vaginally

Bacterial vaginosis, yeast vaginitis

Cervagyn

Vaginal cream

Vaginally

Bacterial vaginosis, yeast vaginitis

Döderlein med

Vaginal capsules

Vaginally

Bacterial vaginosis, yeast vaginitis

GY‐Natren

Vaginal tablets

Vaginally

Bacterial vaginosis, yeast vaginitis

Vivag

Vaginal tablets

Vaginally

Bacterial vaginosis, yeast vaginitis

Yeast infection no more

Vaginal drops

To be added to tampons

Yeast vaginitis

Veganicity multi probiotic

Capsules

Orally

Yeast vaginitis

Acidophilus bifidus fos

Capsules

Orally

Yeast vaginitis, urinary tract infection

Primadophilus

Capsules

Orally

Yeast vaginitis, urinary tract infection, maintain intestinal integrity

Acidophilus bifidobacter fos

Capsules

Orally

Yeast vaginitis, urinary tract infection, maintain intestinal integrity

Acidophilus

Tablets

Orally

Vaginal infections, digestive disorders, other illnesses

Probiotic plus

Chewable tablet

Orally

Yeast vaginitis, improve digestion

Dairy health start system

Powder

Orally

Vaginal infections, urinary tract infection, digestive disorders

Threelac

Powder

Orally

Vaginal infections, urinary tract infection, digestive disorders

Figures and Tables -
Table 1. Commercially available probiotics