A multinuclear solid state NMR study of the sol–gel formation of amorphous Nb2O5–SiO2 materials

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssnmr.2004.08.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Multinuclear 1H, 13C, 17O, 29Si MAS and 93Nb static NMR is reported from a series of sol–gel prepared (Nb2O5)x(SiO2)1−x materials with x=0.03, 0.075 or 0.30. 13C NMR shows that by 500 °C the organic precursor fragments have been removed although some residual carbon remains as a separate phase. The 29Si NMR typically shows three Q-species (Q2,3,4) in the initial gels, and that with increasing heat treatment the average n of the Qn-species increases as the organic fragments and hydroxyl groups are removed. 17O shows unequivocally that the x=0.03 and 0.075 samples are not phase separated, while at the much higher niobia-content of x=0.30 Nb–O–Nb signals are readily detected, a definite indication of the atomic scale phase separation of Nb2O5. The x=0.03 and 0.075 samples heated to 750 °C are thus representative of amorphous niobium silicates. Comparison is made to other sol–gel prepared metal silicates especially with another Group Va metal tantalum. The effects of tantalum and niobium on the silica network are very different and it is suggested here that most of the niobium is present as NbO4, forming part of the silicate network.

Introduction

The sol–gel preparation method [1] is being increasingly used to produce novel materials with interesting physical and chemical properties. Some of these materials are of great technological interest because they combine novel chemical properties with controllable porosity and large surface areas. Silica-based materials are some of the most important sol–gel formed materials, especially with the addition of secondary oxides (e.g. TiO2, ZrO2) which introduce different surface acid sites, making them ideal catalysts. Properties of MOx–SiO2 binary materials are highly dependent on the structure and dispersion of the two oxides. Recently the relatively little studied Nb2O5–SiO2 binary system has been generating significant interest for a range of chemical processes including potential for heterogenous catalysis [2], [3]. The uses of this system include methanol oxidation, ethanol dehydrogenation, partial methane oxidation, selective adsorption and use as a biosensor after immobilising mediator species (see [4], [5] and references therein). Despite the chemical interest in this system there is still relatively little known about the structural basis of these properties. For the Nb2O5–SiO2 system it is still unclear as to whether catalytic properties are related to surface niobium atoms that are actually in the silica framework, or a separate surface dispersed phase, or a mixture of both of these effects.

Solid state NMR is an obvious probe of the local structure of binary (MOx–SiO2) sol–gel produced oxides. For example the loss of organic fragments with heat treatment can be monitored by 13C, as well as 1H, which can also determine the hydroxyl-content [6]. 29Si is a popular probe of the connectivity of silicate networks for both crystalline and amorphous materials through the shift difference between the Qn species (where n is the number of bridging oxygens on a given SiO4 unit) [7]. 93Nb is still a relatively little studied nucleus (nuclear spin (I)=9/2) even though it is 100% naturally abundant. The high spin and relatively high Larmor frequency means that the second-order quadrupolar broadening of the central transition should, for a site of the same distortion, be only ~28% broader than the commonly studied quadrupolar nucleus 27Al. However 93Nb resonances tend to be much broader than those typically observed for 27Al. For example, the values reported for the 93Nb quadrupole interactions from a range of niobates (Table 10.6 in Ref. [7]) are all ⩾13.6 MHz. This is an indication that polarisation effects of the inner shells of electrons are magnifying the electric field gradient at the nucleus in this heavier atom (the Sternheimer antishielding effect).

Oxygen is uniformly distributed throughout the structure in (MOx–SiO2) materials. Over the last decade there has been a large increase in the number of reports of 17O NMR from inorganic solids as it has been realised that oxygen can be an extremely informative nucleus [7]. It is an I=52 quadrupole nucleus, with a relatively small quadrupole moment and large chemical shift range ~1000 ppm in diamagnetic inorganic materials. Its major handicap is its natural abundance of only 0.037% which normally necessitates isotopic enrichment, but for many oxides this is relatively straightforward to achieve by using labelled water in a sol–gel process. For simple oxides 17O has been used to follow their sol–gel formation in a number of cases such as TiO2 [8] and ZrO2 [9]. The initial changes in structure in the sol–gel preparation of MOx–SiO2 materials have been followed by solution-state 17O NMR for SiO2–TiO2 and SiO2–ZrO2 [10]. Once formed and dried, the amorphous gel is a porous solid which continues to change its structure on heating. In (MOx–SiO2) gels a key question is the dispersion of the metal oxide within the silica framework, which can be monitored by 17O NMR measurements of the relative number of M–O–M, M–O–Si and Si–O–Si links. The large shift range of the 17O resonances allows all these different fragments in the TiO2–SiO2 system to be readily resolved in the 1D MAS NMR spectra [11]. 17O MAS NMR has been used to demonstrate the complete mixing of titanium with the silica [12]. The reactivity of the titanium alkoxide can be modified by complexing with acetylacetone to encourage a greater degree of Ti–O–Si crosslinking [13]. In addition to using acetylacetone atomic dispersion can be further improved by functionalising the precursor (e.g. RxSi(OR)4−x), with 17O NMR spectra showing up to five resonances [14]. For the ZrO2–SiO2 system zirconia acts as a network modifier, and it is retained in much higher concentrations in the silica phase than TiO2. Both Zr–O–Zr and Zr–O–Si bonds are well separated in 17O NMR spectra and can clearly be observed [15]. A 17O NMR spectrum of a sample containing 10 mol% ZrO2 showed, in addition to the main Si–O–Si peak, a Zr–O–Si resonance at −150 ppm. At higher zirconia concentrations phase separation occurs, but the silicate phase retains a significant level of zirconium-content as deduced through the intensity of the Zr–O–Si resonance [16].

Here the behaviour of Nb2O5 added to SiO2 will be compared to that of another Group Va ion Ta5+. For Ta2O5–SiO2 gels even at high Ta2O5 concentrations (~25 mol%) where significant phase separation occurs, appreciable Ta–O–Si bonding is still detected by 17O NMR [17]. NMR is used in this paper to examine where the niobium is located in such silica gel-produced samples (i.e. within the silica structure or as a separate phase) and how this varies with niobium concentration and processing temperature. The emphasis here differs from most previous structural studies of Nb2O5–SiO2 materials as the ability of niobium to enter the silicate network is directly examined, rather than the formation of surface layers which has been the focus of most of the previous work e.g. [18].

Section snippets

Experimental details

Samples were prepared using a modified version of the sol–gel method described by Yoldas [19]. Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, Aldrich, 98%) and niobium (V) ethoxide (Aldrich, 99.95%) were chosen as the precursors for a two stage process. This process promotes the creation of Nb–O–Si bonds, within the final xerogel structure, by prehydrolysing the TEOS for 2 h before addition of the niobium (V) ethoxide. The TEOS was dissolved in anhydrous ethanol in the ratio by volume of 1:3.8 and put into a

1H NMR

A typical 1H MAS NMR spectrum is shown in Fig. 1 for an unheated sample. The prominent and relatively narrow peak at 5.2 ppm corresponds to the protons associated with the organic groups, and the broader peak at 7.9 ppm which has a shoulder at 9.2 ppm corresponds to hydroxyls within the sample. On heating, the narrow peak is lost at ~250 °C and the spectrum becomes dominated by the broad residual hydroxyl peak(s). These changes are very similar to those discussed in detail for the ZrO2–TiO2–SiO2

Discussion

1H and 13C NMR are good probes of the residual groups in the initial gel and their removal with temperature. The samples retain organic fragments which have corresponding 1H and 13C signals. Heating to 250 °C is expected to remove the bulk of the organic fragments and this is reflected in the change of the 13C NMR spectra in Fig. 2. Carbon in higher temperature samples corresponds to only a small amount of residual carbon, possibly amorphous carbon with a small degree of protonation. After

Conclusions

Multinuclear solid state NMR of sol–gel produced Nb2O5–SiO2 shows that residual organic fragments and structural hydroxyls are lost after heating to 750 °C to leave amorphous (Nb2O5)x(SiO2)1−x. 17O MAS NMR shows that for x=0.03 and 0.075 there is no Nb–O–Nb bonding, suggesting that niobium is dispersed within the silicate framework. The corresponding 29Si MAS NMR is dominated by signal from Q4 species, indicating that in these samples much of the niobium is probably present as NbO4, in contrast

Acknowledgements

The EPSRC support for work on sol–gel materials is gratefully acknowledged, KOD thanks EPSRC and ERSF for providing a studentship, and MES thanks EPSRC, HEFCE and the University of Warwick for funding NMR equipment at Warwick.

References (31)

  • K. Tanabe

    Catal. Today

    (2003)
  • X. Gao et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2001)
  • P.N. Gunawidjaja et al.

    Solid State NMR

    (2003)
  • E.B. Pereira et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2000)
  • B.E. Yoldas

    J. Non-Cryst. Solids

    (1980)
  • A.C. Kunwar et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (1986)
  • M.E. Smith et al.

    Prog. NMR Spectrosc.

    (1999)
  • E.R.H. van Eck et al.

    Solid State NMR

    (1999)
  • C. Gervais et al.

    Solid State NMR

    (2000)
  • M. Morita et al.

    J. Luminescen.

    (2003)
  • C.J. Brinker, G.W. Scherer Sol–Gel Science: The Physics and Chemistry of Sol–Gel Processing. Academic: San Diego,...
  • I. Nowak et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (1999)
  • M.S.P. Francisco et al.

    J. Mater. Chem.

    (2002)
  • K.J.D. MacKenzie et al.

    Multinuclear Solid State NMR of Inorganic Materials

    (2002)
  • T.J. Bastow et al.

    J. Mater. Chem.

    (1993)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text