Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Prevention of epidural scarring after microdiscectomy: a randomized clinical trial comparing gel and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A randomized clinical trial compared two materials used to prevent epidural scarring after microdiscectomy. To determine whether ADCON®-L Gel (ALG) or Preclude Spinal Membrane® (PSM) was more effective in preventing scarring, reducing pain, and improving quality of life postoperatively. Postdiscectomy syndrome may result from epidural scarring. Various materials have been used in attempts to prevent this problem, but none have provided optimal results. Previous laboratory and clinical studies have found ALG and PSM to be effective, but none compared the two materials. Thirty-one patients undergoing primary microdiscectomy were randomly assigned to receive either ALG or PSM. Postoperatively, patients were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with contrast, for volume and rostral–caudal extent of scar tissue and nerve root involvement. Back and leg pain and quality of life were assessed by neurologic examinations and standardized patient surveys. Findings at any reoperations were recorded. Results in the PSM (n = 18) and ALG (n = 13) groups were compared statistically. No operative or postoperative complications occurred. Two patients in each group required reoperation. MRI at 6 months showed no, mild or mild-moderate scarring in most patients, with no significant differences between the ALG and PSM groups in scar volume and extent or nerve root involvement. Neurologic examinations and patient surveys showed substantial reductions in pain over time in both groups but no significant differences between groups. PSM was easy to see and remove at reoperation. PSM and ALG are equally effective in preventing epidural scarring associated with postdiscectomy syndrome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdou MS, Hardy RW Jr (1999) Epidural fibrosis and the failed back surgery syndrome: history and physical findings. Neurol Res 21(Suppl 1):S5–S8

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barbera J, Gonzalez J, Esquerdo J, Broseta J, Barcia-Salorio JL (1978) Prophylaxis of the laminectomy membrane—an experimental study in dogs. J Neurosurg 49:419–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. BenDebba M, Alphen van A, Long DM (1999) Association between peridural scar and activity-related pain after lumbar discectomy. Neurol Res 21(Suppl 1):S37–S42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brotchi J, Pirotte B, De Witte O, Levivier M (1999) Prevention of epidural fibrosis in a prospective series of 100 primary lumbo-sacral discectomy patients: follow-up and assessment at re-operation. Neurol Res 21(Suppl 1):S47–S50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. DiFazio FA, Nichols J, Pope MH, Frymorer JW (1995) The use of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene as an interpositional membrane after lumbar laminectomy. Spine 9:986–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Geisler FH (1999) Prevention of peridural fibrosis: current methodologies. Neurol Res 21(Suppl 1):S9–S22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerszten PC, Moossy JJ, Flickinger JC, Gerszten K, Kalend A, Martinez AJ (2000) Inhibition of peridural fibrosis after laminectomy using low-dose external beam radiation in a dog model. Neurosurgery 46(6):1478–1485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gerszten PC, Moossy JJ, Flickinger JC, Welch WC (2003) Low-dose radiotherapy for the inhibition of peridural fibrosis after reexploratory nerve root decompression for postlaminectomy syndrome. J Neurosurg 99(Suppl 3):271–277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hadani M, Ram Z, Horowitz A, Shacked I (1993) Silicon prevents post laminectomy epidural root adhesions—an experimental study in rats. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 123:153–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hieb LD, Stevens DL (2001) Spontaneous postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks following application of anti-adhesion barrier gel. Spine 26:748–751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ivanic GM, Pink TP, Homann NC, Scheitza W, Goyal S (2001) The post-discectomy syndrome—aetiology, diagnosis, treatment, prevention. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121:494–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ivanic GM, Wild A, Pink TP, Homann NC (2002) Prevention of epidural fibrosis with a nonabsorbable membrane. Unfallchirurg 105:483–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalogrianitis S, Barrett P, Shackleford I (2001) ADCON-L and hypotension during lumbar microdiscectomy. Br J Anaesth 87:770–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuhn J, Hofmann B, Knitelius HO, Coenen HH, Bewermeyer H (2005) Bilateral subdural haematomata and lumbar pseudomeningocele due to a chronic leakage of liquor cerebrospinalis after a lumbar discectomy with the application of ADCON-L gel. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:1030–1033

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lapis I, Horvath G (2002) Effectiveness of autologous free fat graft and of Spongostan in preventing scar formation after microdiscectomy. Ideggyogy Sz 5:371–374

    Google Scholar 

  16. LaRocca H, Macnab I (1974) The laminectomy membrane—studies in its evolution, characteristics, effects and prophylaxis in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 56B:545–550

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Le AX, Rogers DE, Dawson EG, Kropf MA, De Grange DA, Delamarter RB (2001) Unrecognized durotomy after lumbar discectomy—a report of four cases associated. with the use of ADCON®-L. Spine 1:115–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. MacKay MA, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT, Hecht B, Schwartz M (1995) The effect of interposition membrane on the outcome of lumbar laminectomy and discectomy. Spine 20(16):1793–1796

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Maroon JC, Abla A, Bost J (1999) Association between peridural scar and persistent low back pain after lumbar discectomy. Neurol Res 21(Suppl 1):S43–S36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mastronardi L, Pappagallo M, Tatta C (2005) The Oxiplex/SP gel-morphine compound after lumbar microdiscectomy in the management of postoperative pain. Report of 20 cases. Surg Neurol 64(1):75–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McAuley D, Russell C, Farling P (2004) Adcon-L gel and intraoperative hypotension during lumbar discectomy. Br J Neurosurg 18(2):180–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McCulloch JA, Young PH (1998) Control of bleeding in microsurgery in essentials of spinal microsurgery. Lippincot–Raven, New York, pp 69–87

    Google Scholar 

  23. McKinley DS, Shaffer LM (1999) Cost effectiveness evaluation of ADCON®-L adhesion control gel in lumbar surgery. Neurol Res 21(Suppl 1):S67–S71

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mohsenipour I, Daniauz M, Aichner F, Twerdy K (1998) Prevention of local scar formation after operative discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Acta Neurochir 140:9–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Porchet F, Lombardi D, Preux de J, Pople IK (1999) Inhibition of epidural fibrosis with ADCON®-L: effect on clinical outcome one year following re-operation for recurrent lumbar radiculopathy. Neurol Res 21(Suppl 1):S51–S60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pospiech J, Pajonk F, Stolke D (1995) Epidural scar tissue after Spinal surgery: an experimental study. Eur Spine J 4:213–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Prusick VR, Lint DS, Bruder J (1988) Cauda equina syndrome as complication of free epidural fat-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg 70-A:1256–1258

    Google Scholar 

  28. Robertson JT, Meric AL, Dohan FC, Schweitzer JB, Wujek JR, Ahmad S (1993) The reduction of postlaminectomy peridural fibrosis in rabbits by a carbohydrate polymer. J Neurosurg 79:89–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain; part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 2:141–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain; part II: development of a guideline for trials of treatment in primary care. Spine 2:145–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ross JS, Obduchowski N, Modic TM (1999) MR evaluation of epidural fibrosis proposed grading system with intra- and inter-observer variability. Neurol Res 21(Suppl 1):S23–S26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ross JS, Robertson JT, Frederickson RCA, Petrie JL, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, de Tribolet N (1996) Association between peridural scar and recurrent radicular pain after lumbar discectomy: magnetic resonance evaluation. Neurosurgery 4:855–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Spencer DL (1999) The anatomical basis of sciatica se condary to herniated lumbar disc: a review. Neurol Res 21(Suppl 1):S30–S36

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-item short-form health survey construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wujek JR, Ahmad S, Harel A, Maier KH, Roufa D, Silver J (1991) A carbohydrate polymer that effectively prevents epidural fibrosis at laminectomy sites in the rat. Exp Neurol 114:237–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Flagstaff, AZ, USA for their assistance in providing the materials needed for the investigations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department for Spinal Disorders and Spine Surgery, Hospital for Orthopaedic Surgery Stolzalpe, Stolzalpe, Styria, Austria

    Gerd M. Ivanic, Peter T. Pink, Frank Schneider & Markus Stuecker

  2. Diagnostikum Graz Sued-West, MRI, Graz, Styria, Austria

    Klaus W. Preidler

  3. Department for Neurology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Styria, Austria

    Nicolaus C. Homann

Authors
  1. Gerd M. Ivanic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter T. Pink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frank Schneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Markus Stuecker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nicolaus C. Homann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Klaus W. Preidler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerd M. Ivanic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ivanic, G.M., Pink, P.T., Schneider, F. et al. Prevention of epidural scarring after microdiscectomy: a randomized clinical trial comparing gel and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane. Eur Spine J 15, 1360–1366 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0120-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0120-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation