To read this content please select one of the options below:

Current evidence for the identification and management of premenstrual syndrome in women with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review

Nina C. Cooper (Adult Learning Disability Service, Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust, London, UK) (Department of Psychiatry, North Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK)
Deepa Balachandran Nair (Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, UK)
Sile Egan (Department of Psychiatry, North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK)
Andrew Barrie (University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK)
Bhathika Perera (Haringey Learning Disability Partnership, London, UK)

Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities

ISSN: 2044-1282

Article publication date: 21 October 2019

Issue publication date: 1 November 2019

212

Abstract

Purpose

Intellectual disability (ID) is prevalent in 1 per cent of the population. Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) affects up to 5 per cent of the general population of adult women. Identification of PMS is challenging in women with ID due to differences in communication. Management of PMS in the ID population requires careful consideration of baseline function, co-existing mental and physical health problems, drug interactions as well as complex ethical considerations. The paper aims to discuss this issue.

Design/methodology/approach

Prospero-registered systematic review (CRD42019119398) of papers exploring the diagnosis and management of patients with PMS and ID (n=414). In total, 35 relevant titles were identified and 27 full text papers were assessed for eligibility, resulting in 10 studies for final qualitative analysis.

Findings

Ten original research papers were included. There are no standardised symptom criteria for diagnosis of PMS in women with ID. Studies relied on observer-reported data. All papers demonstrated higher rates of PMS in women with ID compared with the general adult population. Management was not standardised and varied between centres. Mainstays of treatment included non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, combined oral contraceptive pills and intramuscular progesterone. Newer evidence suggests levonorgestrel intrauterine systems may be appropriate. There was no quantitative method of establishing success of management.

Practical implications

A modified symptom diary should be used for diagnosis in this population. Differentiation between cyclical behavioural change due to pain vs mood disturbance remains challenging. Conservative, psychological and medical management should be the mainstay of treatment, with surgery considered in exceptional cases.

Originality/value

This paper demonstrates the current limited evidence for the management of PMS in women with a diagnosis of ID and offers an overview of the current options for managing these patients’ symptoms.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors do not declare any conflicts of interest. No funding received for this publication.

Citation

Cooper, N.C., Balachandran Nair, D., Egan, S., Barrie, A. and Perera, B. (2019), "Current evidence for the identification and management of premenstrual syndrome in women with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review", Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 268-283. https://doi.org/10.1108/AMHID-05-2019-0015

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles