Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effect of Measurement Errors on Apparent Group Level Effects in Educational Progress

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aggregated group-level effects (AGLEs) are widely considered to be an extremelyimportant aspect of learning. However some authors have implied that many apparentfindings of such effects are spurious and arise because of omission or inadequatemeasurement of pre-existing differences. This study considers a further trap, inwhich the appropriate variables are included, but are measured with error.

It shows allowing for measurement error does in fact impact on apparent AGLEs,and that the effects of allowing for measurement error, while apparently inconsistent,can largely be explained as increasing the apparent effect of a variable, and decreasingthe apparent effects of other correlated variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitkin, M. & Longford, N. (1986). Statistical modelling in school effectiveness studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 149: 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, K. L. & Eckland, B. K. (1975). Contextual effects in the high school attainment process,American Sociological Review 43: 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alwin, D. F. & Otto, L. B. (1977). High School Context Effects on Aspirations', Sociology of Education 49(50): 259–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondi, L. (1991). 'Attainment in Primary Schools', British Educational Research Journal 17: 203–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W. A. (1987). Measurement Error Models.London and New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J, Jesson, D. & Sime, N. (1990). Estimating differences in the examination performance of secondary schools in six LEAs: a multilevel approach to school effectiveness, Oxford Review of Education 16(2): 137–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagley, F. (1987). Suffolk Reading Scale: Teacher's Guide.Windsor: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. & Malcolm, H. (1997). Setting and Streaming: A Research Review.Edinburgh: SCRE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, R. M., Sewell, W. H. & Alwin, D. (1976). 'High School Effects on Achievement', in W. H. Sewell, R. M. Hauser and D. L. Featherman, Schooling and Achievement in American Society.New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, V., Mieszkowski, P. & Sauvageau, Y (1978). 'Peer Group Effects and Educational Production Functions', Jr. Public Economics 10: 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, D. (1993). 'School Effectiveness Studies Using Administrative Data', Educational Research 35: 27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, D. (1998). 'The Effect of Group-Level Influences on Pupils' Progress in Reading. Statistic Working Paper 1/98 Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.

  • Hutchison, D. (1999). 'The Effect of Group-Level Influences on Pupils' Progress in Reading', Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.

  • Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D. & Ecob, R. (1988). School Matters, London: Open Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peaker, G. (1967). 'Statistical Appendix' in Children and Their Primary Schools, The Plowden Report.

  • Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P. & Ouston, J. (1979). Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and their Effects on Children.London: Open Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. & Tomlinson, S. (1989). The School Effect: A Study of Multi-Racial Comprehensives. London: Policy Studies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A. & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling.London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukhnandan, L. & Lee, B. (1998), Streaming, Setting and Grouping by Ability: A Review of the Literature .Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, A. & Wolfe, B. (1974), Equality of Educational Opportunity Quantified: A Production Function Approach.Philadelphia: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. & Mortimore, P. (1996). 'Comparison of Value-Added Models for Secondary School Effectiveness', Research Papers in Education 11(1): 5–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willms (1985). 'The Balance Thesis: Contextual Effects of Ability on Pupils' O-grade Examination Results', Oxford Review of Education11: 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willms (1986). Social Class Segregation and Its Relationship to Pupils' Examination Results in Scotland', American Sociological Review 51: 224–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, G., Yang, M., Goldstein, H., Rasbash, J. & Pan, H. (1996). 'Adjusting for Measurement Error in Multilevel Analysis', Jr. Roy. Statist. Soc. (A) 159(2), 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Dougal Hutchison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hutchison, D. The Effect of Measurement Errors on Apparent Group Level Effects in Educational Progress. Quality & Quantity 38, 407–424 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUQU.0000043116.22582.fd

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUQU.0000043116.22582.fd

Search

Navigation