Skip to main content
Log in

Measures of Marketing Success: A Comparison Between China and the United Kingdom

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the importance of assessing business performance, there is little research on the measures used to evaluate marketing effectiveness. This paper replicates in China some UK research into the relative importance of categories of marketing metrics, e.g., financial and non-financial, customer and competitive. The Chinese results are compared with those from the UK. In China, respondents saw financial metrics as less important than their UK counterparts and they appeared to be more marketing oriented, but the difference of consumer orientation across departments of firms in China appears larger than in UK. In both countries the importance given to metrics categories were consistent with orientation, while in China there is no relationship between consumer orientation and the important of direct customer metrics as in UK, but the relationship between competition orientation and the measurement of direct customers was found in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, D.A. (1996). Building Strong Brands. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambler, T. (2000). Marketing and the Bottom Line. The New Metrics of Corporate Wealth. London: Financial Times, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambler, T. and F. Kokkinaki. (1997). “Measures of Marketing Success.” Journal of Marketing Management 13, 665–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambler, T. and D. Riley. (2000). “Marketing Metrics: A Review of Performance Measures in Use in the UK and Spain.” London: London Business School, working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, W. (2001). “The Whereabouts of Former Bidding King.” Beijing Evening Paper, 13th November.

  • Balakrishnan, S. (1996). “Benefits of Customer and Competitor Orientations in Industrial Markets.” Industrial Marketing Management 25, 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, M., C. Dubelaar, and S. Ramaswami. (1994). “Reconciling Diverse Measures of Performance: A Conceptual Framework and Test of a Methodology.” Journal of Business Research 31, 235–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonoma, T.V. and B.H. Clark. (1988). Marketing Performance Assessment. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzzell, R.D. and B.T. Gale. (1987). The PIMS Principles: Linking Strategy to Performance. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J.G. (2002). “The Strategy of State-owned Companies to Global Competition.” People Daily, 21th January

  • Clark, B.H. (1999a). “Marketing Performance Measures: History and Interrelationships.” Journal of Marketing Management 15, 711–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.H. (1999b). “Managerial Perceptions of Marketing Performance: Efficiency, Adaptability, Effectiveness and Satisfaction.” College of Business Administration, Northeastern University, working paper.

  • Davidson, J.H. (1999). “Transforming the Value of Company Reports through Marketing Measurement.” Journal of Marketing Management 15, 757–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G.S. (1990). Market-Driven Strategy. Processes for Creating Value. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G.S. and L. Fahey. (1988). “Valuing Marketing Strategies.” Journal of Marketing 52(3), 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G.S. and R. Wensley. (1988). “Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority.” Journal of Marketing 52(2), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekimpe, M.G. and D.M. Hanssens. (1995). “The Persistence of Marketing Effects on Sales.” Marketing Science 14(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R.G. (1991). “The Performance Measurement Manifesto.” Harvard Business Review (January–February), 131–137.

  • Feder, R.A. (1965). “How to Measure Marketing Performance.” Harvard Business Review 43(May–June), 132–142.

  • Gale, B.T. (1994). Managing Customer Value. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, H.Y. (2001). “Marketing Performance of Chinese Firms Meet the Challenge of Development.” Economicsm Daily, 9th October.

  • Hong, B.H. (1987). Sales Management of Industry Firms. Hangzhong: Zhejiang People Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, B.C. (1988). Marketing Lectures. Beijing: People University of China Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A.K. and B. Jaworski. (1990). “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions and Managerial Implications.” Journal of Marketing 54(April), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokkinaki, F. and T. Ambler. (1999). “Marketing Performance Assessment: An Exploratory Investigation into Current Practice and the Role of Firm Orientation.” Marketing Science Institute. Working paper No. 99-114, Cambridge, MA.

  • Kuang, H. (1990). Marketing Encyclopaedia. Beijing: Beijing Economics and Management Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T. (1983). “After the Sale is Over.” Harvard Business Review 61(September–October), 87–93.

  • Luo, Z.Z. (1982). The Principles and Implication of Sales. Beijing: China Finance and Economics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysonski, S. and A. Pecotich. (1992). “Strategic Marketing Planning, Environmental Uncertainty and Performance.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 9, 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marketing Leadership Council. (2001). “Measuring Marketing Performance: Results of Council Survey.” (August), Washington, D.C.

  • Meyer, M.W. (1998). “Finding Performance: The New Discipline in Management.” Performance Measurement-Theory and Practice. Vol. 1, Cambridge, England: Centre for Business Performance, xiv–xxi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narver, J.C. and S.F. Slater. (1990). “The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability.” Journal of Marketing 54(October), 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlevogt, K. (2000). “The Branding Revolution in China.” China Business Review May–June, 52–57.

  • Sevin, CH.H. (1965). Marketing Productivity Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S.F. and J.C. Narver. (1994). “Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship?” Journal of Marketing 58, 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, R.K. and A.D. Shocker. (1991). “Brand Equity: A Perspective on Its Meaning and Measurement.” Marketing Science Institute. Working paper No. 91-124, Cambridge, MA.

  • Wang, X.C. (1995). Marketing Management. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, S.L. (1994). Marketing. Xian: Xian Jiaotong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B.H. (1993). The Principles of Marketing. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ambler, T., Xiucun, W. Measures of Marketing Success: A Comparison Between China and the United Kingdom. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 20, 267–281 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023896601290

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023896601290

Navigation