Abstract
Little attention has been paid to the role which impression management (IM) of genuine and substantial talents and commitment plays in the careers of female and male managers seeking promotion. IM studies have largely investigated the supervisor/subordinate relationship, often with samples of business students in laboratory settings. In the Cranfield Centre for Developing Women Business Leaders, we have focused on the use of IM by practising managers. In this paper, we examine previous literature for indications that gender may be important in explaining differences in IM behaviours. We then report findings from a survey and a qualitative study, showing that gender, especially combined with age and job level, is a differentiating factor in managers' inclinations to use particular IM behaviours. Many women (and some men too) seem uncomfortable with using IM. Women do not always want to play "the organizational game" by the male-constructed unwritten rules, but prefer to trust good management and systems fairness for just rewards. Younger and junior level women managers often recognize that IM may be a useful tool but reject its use for themselves. Women seem to prefer to rely on extra high performance and commitment for visibility to their seniors rather than the networking, ingratiation and self-promotion strategies used more by males. An important consequence is that as ambitious young males use job-focused IM in addition to self and manager-focused strategies, this is likely to leave young women at a considerable disadvantage for promotion, if the strategies are successful.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alimo-Metcalfe, B.: 1994, ‘Gender Bias in the Selection and Assessment of Women in Management', in M. Davidson and R. J. Burke (eds.), Women in Management: Current Research Issues (Paul Chapman Publishing, London), pp. 93–109.
Barnett, J. H. and M. J. Karson: 1989, ‘Managers' Values and Executive Decisions: An Exploration of the Role of Gender, Career Stage, Organizational Level, Function, and the Importance of Ethics, Relationships, and Results in Managerial Decision Making’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 747–771.
Betz, M., L. O'Connel and J. M. Shepard: 1989, ‘Gender Differences in Proclivity for Unethical Behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 321–332.
Derry, R.: 1989, ‘An Empirical Study of Moral Reasoning Among Managers’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 855–862.
Dobbins, G., W. S. Long, E. J. Dedrick and T. C. Clemons: 1990, ‘The Role of Self-Monitoring and Gender on Leader Emergence: A Laboratory and Field Study’, Journal of Management 16(3), 609–618.
Eagly, A. H. and W. Wood: 1991, ‘Explaining Sex Differences in Social Behaviour: A Meta-Analytic Perspective’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17, 306–315.
Ferris, G. R., P. L. Perrewé, W. P. Anthony and D. C. Gilmore: 2000, ‘Political Skill at Work’, Organizational Dynamics 28(4), 25–37.
Fletcher, J. K.: 1999, Disappearing Acts: Gender, Power and Relational Practice at Work (MIT Press, Cambridge MA).
Franke, G. R., D. Crown and D. F. Spake: 1997, ‘Gender Differences in Ethical Perceptions of Business Practices: A Social Role Theory Perspective’, Journal of Applied Psychology 82(6), 920–934.
Gangestad, S. W. and M. Snyder: 2000, ‘Self-Monitoring: Appraisal and Reappraisal’, Psychological Bulletin 126(4), 530–555.
Gilligan, C.: 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
Gowler, D. and K. Legge: 1989, ‘Rhetoric in Bureaucratic Careers: Managing the Meaning of Management Success', in M. B. Arthur, D. T. Hall and B. S. Lawrence (eds.), Handbook of Career Theory (University Press, Cambridge, Cambridge), pp. 437–453.
Heim, P.: 1993, Hardball for Women: Winning at the Game of Business (Penguin Books, Middlesex).
Ibarra, H.: 2000, ‘Making Partner: A Mentor's Guide to the Psychological Journey’, Harvard Business Review(March-April), 146–155.
Kilduff, M. and D. V. Day: 1994, ‘Do Chameleons Get Ahead? The Effects of Self-Monitoring on Managerial Careers’, Academy of Management Journal 37(4), 1047–1060.
Maddock, S. and D. Parkin: 1993, ‘Gender Cultures: Women's Choices and Strategies at Work’, Women in Management Review 8(2), 3–9.
Oakley, J. G.: 2000, ‘Gender-based Barriers to Senior Management Positions: Understanding the Scarcity of Female CEOs’, Journal of Business Ethics 27(4), 321–334.
Rosener, J. B.: 1990, ‘Ways Women Lead’, Harvard Business Review 68, 119–125.
Rosenfeld, P., R. A. Giacalone and C. A. Riordan: 1995, Impression Management in Organizations: Theory, Measurement, Practice (Routledge, London).
Rudman, L.: 1998, ‘Self-Promotion as a Risk Factor for Women: The Costs and Benefits of Counter-Stereotypical Impression Management’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74, 629–645.
Schein, V. E., R. Mueller, T. Lituchy and J. Liu: 1996, ‘Think Manager, Think Male. A Global Phenomenon’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 17(1), 33–41.
Sheppard, D. L.: 1989, ‘Organizations, Power and Sexuality: The Image and Self-Image of Women Managers', in J. Hearn, D. Sheppard, P. Tancred-Sheriff and G. Burrell (eds.), The Sexuality of Organization (Sage, London) pp. 139–157.
Singh, V. and S. Vinnicombe: 2000a, ‘Preliminary Validation of a New Impression Management Scale for Managers, and the Influence of Sex, Age and Job Level on Impression Management Usage’, European Group for Organizational Studies (EGOS) Colloquium, Helsinki, Finland, July.
Singh, V. and S. Vinnicombe: 2000b, ‘Gendered Meanings of Commitment from High Technology Engineering Managers in the U.K. and Sweden’, Gender, Work and Organization 7(1), 1–19.
Singh, V. and S. Vinnicombe: 2001, ‘Impression Management, Commitment and Gender: Managing Others' Good Opinions’, European Management Journal 19(2), 183–194.
Singh, V., S. Vinnicombe and P. Johnson: 2001, ‘Women Directors on Top U.K. Boards’, Corporate Governance: An International Review 9(3), 206–216.
Stumpf, S. A. and M. London: 1981, ‘Management Promotions: Individual and Organizational Factors influencing the Decision Process’, Academy of Management Review 6(4), 639–549.
Tannen, D.: 1994, Talking from 9 to 5: Women at Work-Language, Sex and Power (Virago, Reading).
Thacker, R. A. and S. J. Wayne: 1995, ‘An Examination of the Relationship between Upward Influence Tactics and Assessments of Promotability’, Journal of Management 21(4), 739–756.
Thompson, K. R. and F. Luthans: 1983, ‘Behavioral Interpretation of Power', in R. W. Allen and L. W. Porter (eds.), Organizational Influence Processes (Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL).
Vinnicombe, S., V. Singh and J. Sturges: 2000, ‘Making it to the Top in Britain', in R. J. Burke and M. Mattis (eds.), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Challenges and Opportunities (Kluwer, Dordrecht), pp. 57–74.
Wayne, S. J. and R. C. Liden: 1995, ‘Effects of Impression Management on Performance Ratings: A Longitudinal Study’, Academy of Management Journal 38(1), 232–260.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, V., Kumra, S. & Vinnicombe, S. Gender and Impression Management: Playing the Promotion Game. Journal of Business Ethics 37, 77–89 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014782118902
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014782118902