Skip to main content
Log in

Empirical Models for Predicting the Dry Matter Yield of Grass Silage Swards Using Plant Tissue Analyses

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantifying spatial variability in forage grass yield within individual fields is hampered by the lack of accurate yield monitoring equipment. Here, it is shown how dry matter (DM) yield of silage swards can be predicted on the basis of their mineral composition. This empirical method of predicting yield enables diagnoses of sward nutrient status to be made simultaneously from the tissue test information, and provides a unique opportunity for identifying the nutritional and non-nutritional factors responsible for variability in sward productivity at sub-field scales. Maps of sward DM yield at first, second and third cut silage stages in 1999, and at first cut silage stage in 2000, on a large (7.9 ha) grassland field were produced using two different yield models: one model for first cut and a separate model for second and third cuts. The maps indicated that DM production varied considerably across the field, particularly at first cut, but that the pattern of yield variability at this cut was consistent from 1999 to 2000. The results of the plant tissue tests suggested that N deficiency had been responsible for limiting DM production on the lower yielding parts of the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. S. Bailey, J. A. M. Beattie, and D. J. Kilpatrick, The diagnosis and recommendation integrated system DRIS for diagnosing the nutrient status of grassland swards: I Model establishment, Plant and Soil 197, 127-135 1997a.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. S. Bailey, A. Cushnahan, and J. A. M. Beattie, The diagnosis and recommendation integrated system DRIS for diagnosing the nutrient status of grassland swards: II Model calibration and validation, Plant and Soil 197, 137-147 1997b.

    Google Scholar 

  • N.G. Barnett and K. J. Shinners, Analysis of systems to measure mass-flow rate and moisture on a forage harvester, ASAE Paper No. 981118, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Hammen and D. Ehlert, The pendulum-meter: a new on-line sensor for determining grass yield for site-specific farming. In: Precision Agriculture 99, Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by J. V. Stafford Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield, UK, 1999, pp. 781-787.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Marcotte, P. Savoie, H. Martel, and R. Theriault, Precision agriculture for hay and forage crops: a ´ review of sensors and potential applications, ASAE Paper No. 991049, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Marschner, Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 2nd ed. Academic Press, London, UK, 1995, p. 889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Fertiliser Recommendations for Agricultural and Horticultural Crops, 3rd ed., Reference Book 209 HMSO, London, UK, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, The Analysis of Agricultural Materials, 3rd ed., Reference Book 427 HMSO, London UK, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Missotten, B. Broos, G. Strubbe, and J. de Baerdemaeker, in Precision Agriculture' 97, Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Precision Agriculture,-ol. II, Technology, IT and Management, edited by J. V. Stafford BIOS Scientific Publisher Ltd., Oxford, UK, 1997, pp. 529-536.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. W. Snedecor and W. G. Cochran, Statistical Methods, 6th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. Stevens and C. J. Watson, The response of grass for silage to sulphur application at 20 sites in Northern Ireland, Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 107, 565-571 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Swindell, Mapping crop yield variations by use of GPS and GIS. In: Proceedings of the First Joint European Conference on Geographical Information, The Hague AKM Congress Services, Basel, Switzerland, 1995, pp. 409-414.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Webster, Quantitative spatial analysis of soil in the field. In: Advances in Agronomy, vol. 3, edited by B. A. Stewart Springer-Verlag, New York, USA, 1985, pp. 1-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Wild and H. Auernhammer, Dynamic weighing in a round baler for local yield measurement, ASAE Paper No. 971055 American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St Joseph, MI, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bailey, J.S., Higgins, A. & Jordan, C. Empirical Models for Predicting the Dry Matter Yield of Grass Silage Swards Using Plant Tissue Analyses. Precision Agriculture 2, 131–145 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011421613409

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011421613409

Navigation