Skip to main content
Log in

On the Validity of the Wiener Process Assumption in Option Pricing Models: Contradictory Evidence from Taiwan

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study tests the validity of the critical assumption underlying the option pricing model that the log form of the stock price movements follows the Wiener process, i.e., stock price movements follow a geometric Brownian motion. Using data compiled from the Taiwan Stock Exchange (TSE), this study's major empirical findings are as follows: first, the null hypothesis that the log of the stock prices is normally distributed is rejected; second, the null hypothesis that the stock price in log form has mean [ln P s + (µ- \( - \frac{1}{2}\) σ2)t] and variance αt is rejected; third, the null hypothesis that successive non-overlapping increments of the log of the stock price are independent from each other is also rejected. These empirical findings undermine the validity of the Wiener process assumption which is fundamental to many option pricing models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachelier, L., ``Theory of Speculation (English translation).'' in P.H. Cootner, ed., The Random Character of Stock Market Prices, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 17-78, 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, C. and A. Roma, ``Stochastic Volatility Option Pricing.'' Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 4, 589-607, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F. and M. Scholes, ``The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.'' Journal of Political Economy 81, 637-669, (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., ``Fact and Fantasy in the Use of Options.'' Financial Analysts Journal 31, 36-41, 61-72, (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., ``How to Use the Holes in Black-Scholes.'' in D. Chew, ed., The New Corporate Finance: Where Theory Meets Practice, McGraw-Hill, New York, 419-425, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J.C. and S.A. Ross, ``The Valuation of Options for Alternative Stochastic Processes.'' Journal of Financial Economics 3, 145-166, (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J.C., M. Rubinstein, and S. Ross, ``Option Pricing: A Simpli®ed Approach.'' Journal of Financial Economics 7, 229-263, (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujihara, R. and K. Park, ``The Probability Distribution of Futures Prices in the Foreign Exchange Market: A Comparison of Candidate Processes.'' Journal of Futures Markets 6, 623-641, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.A., B.W. Brorsen, and S.H. Irwin, ``The Distribution of Futures Prices: A Test of Stable Paretian and Mixture of Normal Hypotheses.'' Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 24, 105-116, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Chi-fu, ``Contingent Securities Valuation in Continuous Time.'' Journal of Financial Studies, The Chinese Finance Association, 2, 127-143, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, M.A., R.M. Leuthod, and G.P. Sarassoro, ``Commodity Futures Price Changes: Recent Evidence for Wheat, Soybean and Live Cattle.'' Journal of Futures Markets 7, 287-301, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackwerth, J.C. and M. Rubinstein, ``Recovering Probability Distributions from Option Prices.'' The Journal of Finance 51, 1611-1631, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, T. and B.W. Brorsen, ``Conditional Heteroskedasticity, Asymmetry and Option Pricing.'' Journal of Futures Markets 8, 901-928, (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.F., G. Yen, and C. Chang, ``Informational Ef®ciency of Capital Market Revisited: Anomalous Evidence from A Re®ned Test.'' Advances in Quantitative Analysis of Finance and Accounting 2(A), 39-65, (1993).

  • Merton, R.C., ``Theory of Rational Option Pricing.'' Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4, 141-183, (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.C., ``Option Pricing: When Underlying Stock Returns are Discontinuous.'' Journal of Financial Economics 3, 125-144, (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Papoulis, A., Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Process, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R., ``An Analytic Valuation Formula for Unprotected American Call Options on Stocks with Known Dividends.'' Journal of Financial Economics 5, 251-258, (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P., ``Rational Theory of Warrant Pricing.'' Industrial Management Review 6, 13-32, (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C.W. Jr., ``Option Pricing: A Review.'' in J.C. Francis, C.F. Lee, and D.E. Farrar, eds., Readings in Investments, McGraw-Hill, New York, 616-664, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S.J., ``The Behavior of Futures Return over Time.'' Applied Economics 17, 713-734, (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S.R. and B.W. Brorsen, ``Nonlinear Dynamics of Daily Futures Price: Conditional Heteroskedasticity or Chaos.'' Journal of Futures Markets 13, 175-191, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yen, G., Yen, E.C. On the Validity of the Wiener Process Assumption in Option Pricing Models: Contradictory Evidence from Taiwan. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 12, 327–340 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008309307499

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008309307499

Navigation