Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in chronic glomerulonephritides: correlation with histological parameters of disease activity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ultrasound Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS)-derived time-intensity (TI) curves with histological findings in kidneys of patients affected by chronic glomerulonephritides (GN) in the early stage of disease.

Methods

Research ethics committee approval and patient written informed consent were obtained. Thirty-one patients who showed clinical and laboratory signs of GN, with preserved renal function, were consecutively enrolled. They underwent kidney CEUS, from which TI curves were obtained, and kidney biopsy. TI curves were compared with clinical data, ultrasound (US) Doppler, and histological parameters.

Results

The persistence of contrast agent signal during the wash-out phase was found to be correlated with the degree of disease activity (p = 0.016) and in particular with the presence of mesangial hyperplasia (p = 0.008). No correlation was observed between TI curves and clinical or Doppler US-derived parameters.

Conclusions

The persistence of contrast agent signal in the wash-out phase of CEUS appears to reflect a disturbance of perfusion in glomerular capillaries in the early stages of GN. We found that the histological element directly correlated with the prolonged wash-out was mesangial hyperplasia.

Sommario

Scopo

Confrontare le curve intensità-tempo (TI) derivate dallo studio ecografico con mezzo di contrasto (CEUS) con i reperti istologici dei reni in pazienti affetti da glomerulonefrite (GN) cronica nelle fasi iniziali di malattia

Metodi

Abbiamo dunque arruolato 31 pazienti con segni clinici e laboratoristici di GN e con funzione renale conservata. Costoro sono stati sottoposti a CEUS e biopsia renali. Si è quindi proceduto alla valutazione della curve TI rispetto ai parametri clinici, eco Doppler e istologici

Risultati

La persistenza del mezzo di contrasto nella fase di wash-out correla con il grado di attività di malattia, ed in particolare con la presenza di iperplasia mesangiale. Non sono state trovate correlazioni tra le curve TI ed i dati eco Doppler e clinici

Conclusioni

Nelle fasi iniziali delle GN, la persistenza del mezzo di contrasto durante la fase di wash-out sembra documentare una condizione di alterata perfusione nei capillari glomerulari, direttamente correlata all’iperplasia mesangiale

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Floege J, Amann K (2016) Primary glomerulonephritides. Lancet 387:2036–2048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Segelmark M, Hellmark T (2010) Autoimmune kidney diseases. Autoimmun Rev 9:A366–A371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Below JE, Cho ME, Austin HA (2008) Immunologic renal diseases. In: Rich R et al (eds) Clinical immunology: principles and practice, 3rd edn. Mosby, St. Louis, Mo, pp 995–1012

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E, Kausz AT, Levin A, Steffes MW, Hogg RJ, Perrone RD, Lau J, Eknoyan G (2003) National Kidney Foundation Practice Guidelines for Chronic kidney Disease: evaluation, classification and stratifications. Ann Intern Med 139:137–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Quaia E, Bertolotto M (2002) Renal parenchymal disease: is characterization feasible with ultrasound? Eur Radiol 12:2006–2020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Piscaglia F, Nolsøe C, Dietrich CF et al (2012) The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical practice of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med 33(1):33–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Correas JM, Hélénon O, Moreau JF (1999) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of native and transplanted kidney diseases. Eur Radiol 9:S394–S400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Farina R, Pennisi F, La Rosa M, Puglisi C, Di Benedetto A, Campisi G, Mazzone G, Ettorre GC (2007) Functional study of the transplanted kidney with power Doppler US and time/intensity curves. Radiol Med 112:64–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsuruoka K, Yasuda T, Koitabashi K, Yazawa M, Shimazaki M, Sakurada T, Shirai S, Shibagaki Y, Kimura K, Tsujimoto F (2010) Evaluation of renal microcirculation by contrast-enhanced ultrasound With SonazoidTM as a Contrast Agent. Comparison between normal subjects and patients with chronic kidney disease. Int Heart J 51:176–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nestola M, Fuso P, Costanzi S, Ferraro PM, Riccardi L, Pompili M, Gambaro G, Gasbarrini G, Rapaccini GL (2009) Studio del rene nativo nell’adulto normale e nefropatico tramite ultrasonografia con mezzo di contrasto. SIUMB, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  11. Okayama S, Hirai T, Yamashita N, Somekawa S, Iwano M, Uemura S, Kanauchi M, Saito Y (2008) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with Sonazoid for evaluation of renal microcirculation. J Med Ultrason 35:183–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wei K, Le E, Bion JP, Coggins M, Thorpe J, Kaul S (2001) Quantification of renal blood flow with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1135–1140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, Coresh J, CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) (2009) A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 150:604–612

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Rapaccini GL, Pompili M, Caturelli E, Amadei E, Aliotta A, Grattagliano A, Savini E, Anti M (1989) Real-time ultrasound guided renal biopsy in diffuse renal disease: 114 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 3:42–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Capuano A, Costanzi S, Peluso G, Zannoni GF, Vellone VG, Gremese E, Zoli A, Scott C, Beltrami CA, Romano G, Ferraccioli GF (2006) Hepatocyte growth factor and transforming growth factor beta1 ratio at baseline can predict early response to cyclophosphamide in systemic lupus erythematosus nephritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 54:3633–3639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM, Seshan SV, Alpers CE, Appel GB, Balow JE, Bruijn JA, Cook T, Ferrario F, Fogo AB, Ginzler EM, Hebert L, Hill G, Hill P, Jennette JC, Kong NC, Lesavre P, Lockshin M, Looi LM, Makino H, Moura LA, Nagata M (2004) The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. J Am Soc Nephrol 15:241–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Austin HA, Boumpas DT, Vaughan EM, Balow JE (1994) Predicting renal outcomes in severe lupus nephritis: contributions of clinical and histologic data. Kidney Int 45:544–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Correas JM, Bridal L, Lesavre A, Méjean A, Claudon M, Hélénon O (2001) Ultrasound contrast agents: properties, principles of action, tolerance, and artifacts. Eur Radiol 11:1316–1328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lindner JR, Song J, Jayaweera AR, Sklenar J, Kaul S (2002) Microvascular rheology of definity microbubbles after intra-arterial and intravenous administration. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15:396–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lidner JR, Wei K (2002) Contrast echocardiography. Curr Probl Cardiol 27(11):454–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Forsberg F, Piccoli CW, Merton DA, Palazzo JJ, Hall AL (2007) Breast lesions: imaging with contrast-enhanced subharmonics US—initial experience. Radiology 244:718–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. van Esser S, Veldhuis WB, van Hillegersberg R, van Diest PJ, Stapper G, ElOuamari M, Borel Rinkes IH, Mali WP, van den Bosch MA (2007) Accuracy of contrast-enhanced breast ultrasound for pre-operative tumors size assessment in patients diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Cancer Imaging 7:63–68

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ridolfi F, Abbattista T, Marini F, Vedovelli A, Quagliarini P, Busilacchi P, Brunelli E (2007) Contrast enhanced ultrasound to evaluate the severity of chronic hepatitis C. Dig Liv Dis 39:929–935

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Oldenburg A, Albrecht T (2008) Baseline and contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver in tumor patients. Ultraschall Med 29:488–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pompili M, Riccardi L, Semeraro S, Orefice R, Elia F, Barbaro B, Covino M, Grieco A, Gasbarrini G, Rapaccini GL (2008) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound assessment of arterial vascularization of small nodules arising in the cirrhotic liver. Dig Liv Dis 40:206–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hohmann J, Albrecht T, Hoffmann CW, Wolf KJ (2003) Ultrasonographic detection of focal liver lesions: increased sensitivity and specificity with microbubble contrast agents. Eur J Radiol 46:147–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hata J, Kamada T, Haruma K, Kusunoki H (2005) Evaluation of bowel ischemia with contrast-enhanced US: initial experience. Radiology 236:712–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rapaccini GL, Pompili M, Orefice R, Covino M, Riccardi L, Cedrone A, Gasbarrini G (2004) Contrast-enhanced power Doppler of the intestinal wall in the evaluation of patients with Crohn disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 39:188–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Leiner T, Kessels AG, Nelemans PJ, Vasbinder GB, de Haan MW, Kitslaar PE, Ho KY, Tordoir JH, van Engelshoven JM (2005) Peripheral arterial disease: comparison of color duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. Radiology 235:699–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hamada T, Yamauchi M, Tanaka M, Hashimoto Y, Nakai K, Suenaga K (2007) Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with advanced dynamic flow for the diagnosis of intestinal ischaemia. Br J Radiol 80:603–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kalantarinia K, Okusa MD (2007) Ultrasound Contrast agents in the study of kidney function in health and disease. Drug Discov Today Dis Mech 4:153–158

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Correas JM, Claudon M, Tranquart F, Hélénon AO (2006) The kidney: ultrasound with microbubble contrast agents. Ultrasound Q 22:53–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Setola SV, Catalano O, Sandomenico F, Siani A (2007) Contrast-enhanced sonography of the kidney. Abdom Imaging 32:21–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Schwenger V, Hinkel UP, Nahm AM, Morath C, Zeier M (2006) Real-time contrast-enhanced sonography in renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 20:51–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Correas JM, Claudon M, Tranquart F, Hélénon O (2003) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: renal applications. J Radiol 84:2041–2054

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cokkinos DD, Antypa EG, Skilakaki M, Kriketou D, Tavernaraki E, Piperopoulos PN (2013) Contrast enhanced ultrasound of the kidneys: what is it capable of? Biomed Res Int 2013:595873

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Benozzi L, Cappelli G, Granito M, Davoli D, Favali D, Montecchi MG, Grossi A, Torricelli P, Albertazzi A (2009) Contrast-enhanced sonography in early kidney graft dysfunction. Transplant Proc 41:1214–1215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mori G, Granito M, Favali D, Cappelli G (2015) Long-term prognostic impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and power Doppler in renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 47:2139–2141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Correas JM, Anglicheau D, Joly D, Gennisson JL, Tanter M, Hélénon O (2016) Ultrasound-based imaging methods of the kidney-recent developments. Kidney Int 90(6):1199–1210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fiorini F, Barozzi L (2007) The role of ultrasonography in the study of medical nephropathy. J Ultrasound 10(4):161–167

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Spatola L, Andrulli S (2016) Doppler ultrasound in kidney diseases: a key parameter in clinical long-term follow-up. J Ultrasound 19(4):243–250

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Marzano MA, Pompili M, Rapaccini GL, Covino M, Cotroneo P, Manto A, Todaro L, Ghirlanda G, Gasbarrini G (1998) Early renal involvement in diabetes mellitus: comparison of renal Doppler US and radioisotope evaluation of glomerular hyperfiltration. Radiology 209:813–817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Gigante A, Barbano B, Di Mario F, Rosato E, Simonelli M, Rocca AR, Conti F, Ceccarelli F, Giannakakis K, Valesini G, Cianci R (2016) Renal parenchymal resistance in patients with biopsy proven glomerulonephritis: correlation with histological findings. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 29:469–474

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Mezzano SA, Ruiz-Ortega M, Egido J (2001) Angiotensin II and renal fibrosis. Hypertension 38:635–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Alexopulos E, Papagianni A, Stangou M, Pantzaki A, Papadimitriou M (2000) Adult-onset idiophatic nephrotic syndrome associated with pure diffuse mesangial hypercellularity. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15:981–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuela Nestola.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed written consent was obtained from all patients included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nestola, M., De Matthaeis, N., Ferraro, P.M. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in chronic glomerulonephritides: correlation with histological parameters of disease activity. J Ultrasound 21, 81–87 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-018-0298-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-018-0298-1

Keywords

Navigation