Skip to main content
Log in

The Use of Calibration Weighting for Variance Estimation Under Systematic Sampling: Applications to Forest Cover Assessment

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this note is to propose a variance estimator under non-measurable designs that exploits the existence of an auxiliary variable well correlated with the survey variable of interest. Under non-measurable designs, the Sen–Yates–Grundy variance estimator generates a downward bias that can be reduced using a calibration weighting based on the auxiliary variable. Conditions of approximate unbiasedness for the resulting calibration estimator are given. The application to systematic sampling is considered. The proposal proves to be effective for estimating the variance of the forest cover estimator in remote sensing-based surveys, owing to the strong correlation between the reference data, available from a systematic sample, and the satellite map data, available for the whole population and hence exploited as an auxiliary variable. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartolucci F, Montanari GE (2006) A new class of unbiased estimator for the variance of the systematic sample mean. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 136:1512–1525.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Corona P, Fattorini L, Pagliarella MC (2015) Sampling strategies for estimating forest cover from remote sensing-based two-stage inventories. Forest Ecosystems 2:18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fattorini L (2006) Applying the Horvitz-Thompson criterion in complex designs: a computer-intensive perspective for estimating inclusion probabilities. Biometrika 93:269–278

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grafström A (2012) Spatial correlated Poisson sampling. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 142:139–147

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grafström A, Tillé Y (2013) Doubly balanced spatial sampling with spreading and restitution of auxiliary totals. Environmetrics 24:120–131

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Grafström A, Lundström NLP, Schelin L (2012) Spatially Balanced Sampling through the Pivotal Method. Biometrics 68:514–520

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire TG, Næsset E, McRoberts RE, Ståhl G, Andersen HE, Ene L, Nelson R (2016) Statistical rigor in lidar-assisted estimation of aboveground forest biomass. Remote Sensing of Environment 173: 98–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire TG, Valentine HT (2008) Sampling Strategies for Natural Resources and the Environment. Chapman & Hall/CRC.

  • Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova SA, Tyukavina A, Thau D, Stehman SV, Goetz SJ, Loveland TR, Kommareddy A, Egorov A, Chini L, Justice CO, Townshend JRG (2013) High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change. Science 342:850–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasel AA (1938) Sampling error in timber surveys. Journal of Agricultural Research 57: 713–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedayat AS, Sinha BK (1991) Design and Inference in Finite Population Sampling. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Langsæter A (1926) Om beregning av middelfeilen ved regelmessige linjetakseringer (About calculation of standard error for systematic strip survey). Meddelelser fra Det Norske Skog-forsøksvesen 2: 5–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matérn B (1960) Spatial variation: stochastic models and their application to some problems in forest surveys and other sampling investigations. Technical Report 5, Meddelanden från Statens Skogsforskninstitut, Stockholm, Sweden.

  • Montanari GE, Bartolucci F (1998) On estimating the variance of the systematic sample mean. Journal of the Italian Statistical Society 7:185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman J (1934) On two different aspects of the representative method: the method of stratified sampling and the method of purposive selection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 97: 558–606.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Opsomer JD, Francisco-Fernandez M, Li X (2012) Model-based non-parametric variance estimation for systematic sampling. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 39: 528–542.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne JG (1942) Sampling errors of systematic and random surveys of cover type areas. Journal of the American Statistical Association 37: 256–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens DJ, Olsen AR (2004) Spatially balanced sampling of natural resources. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99:262–278

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sannier C, Mc Roberts RE, Fichet LV, Makaga EMK (2014) Using regression estimator with Landsat data to estimate proportion forest cover and net proportion deforestation in Gabon. Remote Sensing of Environment 151:138–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Särndal CE, Lundström S (2005) Estimation in Surveys with Nonresponse. Wiley, New York.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Särndal CE, Swensson B, Wretman J (1992) Model Assisted Survey Sampling. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tomppo LM, Gschwantner RE, McRoberts RE Eds (2010) National forest inventories: pathways for common reporting. Springer, Heidelberg

  • UN-REDD (2013) National Forest Monitoring Systems: Monitoring and Measurement, Reporting and Verification (M & MRV) in the context of REDD+ Activities. FAO, Rome

  • Wolter KM (1984) An investigation of some estimators of variance for systematic sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79:781–790.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wolter KM (2007) Introduction to Variance Estimation (\(2^{{\rm nd}}\) edn). Springer-Verlag, New York.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenzo Fattorini.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (docx 96 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (FOR 2 KB)

Supplementary material 3 (FOR 1 KB)

Supplementary material 4 (FOR 1 KB)

Supplementary material 5 (FOR 2 KB)

Supplementary material 6 (FOR 1 KB)

Supplementary material 7 (FOR 1 KB)

Supplementary material 8 (FOR 2 KB)

Supplementary material 9 (txt 37 KB)

Supplementary material 10 (FOR 1 KB)

Supplementary material 11 (FOR 1 KB)

Supplementary material 12 (FOR 1 KB)

Supplementary material 13 (FOR 1 KB)

Supplementary material 14 (FOR 1 KB)

Supplementary material 15 (FOR 2 KB)

Supplementary material 16 (FOR 5 KB)

Supplementary material 17 (FOR 1 KB)

Supplementary material 18 (FOR 1 KB)

Supplementary material 19 (FOR 1 KB)

Supplementary material 20 (FOR 1 KB)

Supplementary material 21 (FOR 5 KB)

Supplementary material 22 (FOR 1 KB)

Supplementary material 23 (FOR 5 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fattorini, L., Gregoire, T.G. & Trentini, S. The Use of Calibration Weighting for Variance Estimation Under Systematic Sampling: Applications to Forest Cover Assessment. JABES 23, 358–373 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-018-0325-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-018-0325-x

Keywords

Navigation