Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of errors with the Tripotential array and their reduction by a filtering technique

  • ArabGU2016
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to investigate the effect of lateral errors on the sounding curves and subsequently their reduction, a site where considerable amount of inhomogeneities were thought to exist because of the excavations made during the building work previously carried out was chosen as a study area. Using the tripotential system of sounding promoted by Carpenter and Habberjam (Geophysics 21: 455-469, 1956), several soundings were performed. For some small electrode spacings, the three apparent resistivity curves were locally divergent indicating the existence of small-scale lateral errors; in other cases, these curves cross each other indicating the existence of additional observational errors. Some soundings showed continuous divergence of the three apparent resistivity curves as an indication of the existence of a major lateral discontinuity. Because of the interference of these disturbing effects, the interpretation of the soundings based on a horizontally layered earth is erroneous. One of these soundings containing these kinds of errors is taken as example. In order to reduce the effect of local inhomogeneities, an approach based on the linear filtering technique is suggested. As a check of the effectiveness of this method, the recalculated values of the two lateral error tests suggested by the authors were reduced when the three smoothed apparent resistivity curves were used. However, this method seemed more suitable for a flat trend data than for a data with a trend.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdullahi NK, Batu MA (2012) Fracture determination using azimuthal Schlumberger and offset Wenner array in basement complex of western Nigeria. Research Journal of environmental and earth science 4(7):747–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Acworth RI, Griffiths DH (1985) Simple data processing of tripotential resistivity measurements as an aid to the interpretation of subsurface structure. Geophys Prospect 3:861–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker RD (1979) Signal contribution sections and their use in resistivity studies. Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc 59:123–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker RD (1981) The offset Wenner system of electrical resistivity sounding and its use with a multicore cable. Geophys Prospect 29:128–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendat JS, Piersol AG (1978) Measurement and analysis of random data. John Wiley- interscience Publication, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham C, Godfrey M D, Tukey J W (1967) Modern techniques of power spectrum estimation. I.E.E.E. Transactions on audio and electro-acoustic Vol. AU- 15, No. 2

  • Carpenter EW, Habberjam GM (1956) A tripotential method of resistivity prospecting. Geophysics 21:455–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve AK, Acworth IA (2010) Detection of subsurface soil cracks by vertical anisotropy profiles of apparent electrical resistivity. Geophysics 75(4):WA85–WA93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habberjam GM, Watkins GE (1967) The use of the square configuration in resistivity prospecting. Geophys Prospect 15:221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan AA (2013) Effect of soil cracking on 2 D electrical resistivity measurements. International Journal of Science and Research 4:2981–2984

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs BA, Reading AM (1994) Shallow fault location in coal measures using offset Wenner resistivity profiling. Geophys Prospect 42:343–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanasewich ER (1973) Time sequence analysis in geophysics. The university of Alberta press, Alberta

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrick N P (1974) The pole-multidipole method of geoelectrical sounding. Exploration Geophysics 5(2), p 48

  • Michael G A, Agwul A A (2014) DC resitivity investigation of anisotropy and lateral effect using azimuthal offset Wenner array. A case study of the University of Calabar, Nigeria. Journal of environmental and earth science 4(1): 53:60

  • Morris M, Ronning J S (1993) Detecting lateral resistivity inhomogeneities with the Schlumberger array. Extended abstract of 55 the EAEG meeting, Stavanger, Norway

  • Nazerali N A, Coles D A, Minsley B, Mukhopadhyay A, Al-Ruwaih, Morgan F D (2015) Effects of lateral heterogeneity on 1D D.C resistivity and transient electromagnetic soundings in Kuwait. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts pp 4989–4993

  • Otnes KR, Enochson L (1978) Applied time series analysis. John Wiley – interscience Publication, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang M (1985) Reduction of the effects of lateral resistivity variations in Schlumberger Geosounding. Warsaw University, Department of Geology, Institute of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology 139 Pages

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miloud Chermali.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Current Advances in Geology of North Africa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chermali, M., Bounif, M.O. & Boudella, A. Detection of errors with the Tripotential array and their reduction by a filtering technique. Arab J Geosci 10, 353 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3136-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3136-4

Keywords

Navigation