Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bark type reflects growth potential of yellow birch and sugar maple at the northern limit of their range

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We carried out a study to determine if bark type could reflect the growth potential of yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis Britt.) and sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) at the northern limit of their range in Québec, Canada (47°N, 75°W). We measured a large sample of 266 trees that ranged in size from 95 to 712 mm in diameter at breast height, on two independent study sites. Our results suggest that trees with smooth bark type had mean 5-year diameter increment 8 and 11 mm higher than trees with rough bark type, depending upon the study site. Differences in growth of 8 and 11 mm represented 85% of the overall rough bark type increment in the first site and 78% of the overall rough bark type increment in the second site. The rapid identification of a tree’s growth potential using bark type could be of great use to practitioners because it avoids the need to bore trees to collect increment cores, which injures trees and may serve as an entry point for disease. Moreover, the proposed method helps protect or release the smallest trees with high growth potential and remove trees with low growth potential. While the proposed method is valuable to practitioners operating in uneven-aged forests, its applicability still needs to be tested in even-aged forests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbogast C Jr (1957) Marking guides for northern hardwoods under the selection system. USDA For Serv, Station Pap LS-56, St Paul

  • Bédard S, Majcen Z (2001) Ten-year response of sugar maple-yellow birch-beech stands to selection cutting in Québec. North J Appl For 19:119–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Beineke WF (1989) Twenty years of black walnut genetic improvement at Purdue University. North J Appl For 6:68–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Binkley D, Stape JL, Ryan MG, Barnard HR, Fownes JH (2002) Age-related decline in forest ecosystem growth: an individual-tree, stand-structure hypothesis. Ecosystems 5:58–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boisvert-Marsh L, Périé C, De Blois S (2014) Shifting with climate? Evidence for recent changes in tree species distribution at high latitudes. Ecosphere 5:83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen KE, Godman RM (1969) Bark characteristics indicate age and growth rate of yellow birch. USDA For Serv, Res Note NC–75, St Paul

  • Fortin M, Bédard S, DeBlois J, Meunier S (2008) Accounting for error correlations in diameter increment modelling: a case study applied to northern hardwood stands in Quebec, Canada. Can J For Res 38:2274–2286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier M-M, Jacobs DF (2010) Northern red oak, white oak, and black walnut diameter growth for the first 3 years after thinning in a mixed planting. North J Appl For 27:110–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle MC (1965) Variation in foliage composition and diameter growth of yellow birch with season, soil, and tree size. Soil Sci Soc Am J 29:475–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs DF (2007) Toward development of silvical strategies for forest restoration of American chestnut (Castanea dentata) using blight-resistant hybrids. Biol Conserv 137:497–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junikka L (1994) Survey of English macroscopic bark terminology. IAWA J 15:3–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamit LJ, Lau MK, Naesborg RR, Wojtowicz T, Whitham TG, Gehring CA (2015) Genotype variation in bark texture drives lichen community assembly across multiple environments. Ecology 96:960–971

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawes MJ, Richards A, Dathe J, Midgley JJ (2011) Bark thickness determines fire resistance of selected tree species from fire-prone tropical savanna in north Australia. Plant Ecol 212:2057–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Villalobos A, Flores-Palacios A, Ortiz-Pulido R (2008) The relationship between bark peeling rate and the distribution and mortality of two epiphyte species. Plant Ecol 198:265–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messier C, Nikinmaa E (2000) Effects of light availability and sapling size on the growth, biomass allocation, and crown morphology of understory sugar maple, yellow birch, and beech. Ecoscience 7:345–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken GA, Johnson DE (2009) Chapter 6.2 Least squares estimation. In: Analysis of messy data. Volume 1—Designed experiments, 2nd edn. CRC Press, pp 161–169

  • Nyland RD (1996) Silviculture: concepts and application. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • OMNR (1983) Management of tolerant hardwoods in Algonquin Provincial Park. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Queen’s Printer for Ontario, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • OMNR (2004) Ontario tree marking guide. Version 1.1. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Queen’s Printer for Ontario, Toronto

  • Ouimet R, Duchesne L, Moore J-D (2017) Response of northern hardwoods to experimental soil acidification and alkalinisation after 20 years. For Ecol Manag 400:600–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prévost M, Gauthier M-M (2012) Precommercial thinning increases growth of overstory aspen and understory balsam fir in a boreal mixedwood stand. For Ecol Manag 278:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond P, Bédard S, Roy V, Larouche C, Tremblay S (2009) The irregular shelterwood system: review, classification, and potential application to forests affected by partial disturbances. J For 107:407–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Régnière J, Saint-Amant R, Béchard A (2014) BioSIM 10—user’s manual. Nat Resour Can, Can For Serv, Inf Rep LAU-X-137E, Québec

  • Rosell JA (2016) Bark thickness across the angiosperms: more than just fire. New Phytol 211:90–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosell JA, Gleason S, Méndez-Alonzo R, Chang Y, Westoby M (2014) Bark functional ecology: evidence for tradeoffs, functional coordination, and environment producing bark diversity. New Phytol 201:486–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross-Davis AL, Huang Z, McKenna J, Ostry M, Woeste K (2008) Morphological and molecular methods to identify butternut (Juglans cinerea) and butternut hybrids: relevance to butternut conservation. Tree Physiol 28:1127–1133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MG, Binkley D, Fownes JH (1997) Age-related decline in forest productivity: pattern and process. Adv Ecol Res 27:213–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sajdak RL (1968) Variation in bark characters and wood specific gravity in sugar maple. In: Wright JW (ed) Proceedings of the Eighth Lake States Forest Tree Improvement Conference, 12–13 Sept 1967, Madison, WI. USDA For Serv, Res Pap NC–23, St Paul, pp 10–14

  • SAS Institute Inc (2009) SAS/STAT® 9.2 User’s guide, 2nd edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert AT, Nano CEM, Clarke PJ, Lawes MJ (2016) Evidence for bark thickness as a fire-resistance trait from desert to savanna in fire-prone inland Australia. Plant Ecol 217:683–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweingruber FH (2012) Tree rings: basics and applications of dendrochronology. Klewer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith FW, Long JN (2001) Age-related decline in forest growth: an emergent property. For Ecol Manag 144:175–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei X, Borralho NMG (1997) Genetic control of wood basic density and bark thickness and their relationships with growth traits of Eucalyptus urophylla in south east China. Silva Genet 46:245–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfall PH, Tobias RD, Wolfinger RD (2011) Multiple comparisons and multiple tests using SAS, 2nd edn. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Jocelyn Hamel, Pierre Laurent, Jean-François Leblond, William Michaud, and Aurélien Stique for their help in establishing the study and data collection. We thank Marie-Claude Lambert for advice on statistical analyses. We appreciate comments and suggestions from Dr. William E. Rogers and two anonymous reviewers that helped improve the quality of this manuscript. Funding for this study was provided by the Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs du Québec, under Project Number 142332048 (François Guillemette).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Québec Ministry of Forests, Parks, and Wildlife, Forest Research Branch, 2700 Einstein, Québec, QC, G1P 3W8, Canada

    Martin-Michel Gauthier & François Guillemette

Authors
  1. Martin-Michel Gauthier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. François Guillemette
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin-Michel Gauthier.

Additional information

Communicated by Jan Wunder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gauthier, MM., Guillemette, F. Bark type reflects growth potential of yellow birch and sugar maple at the northern limit of their range. Plant Ecol 219, 381–390 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-018-0802-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-018-0802-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation