Skip to main content
Log in

Do UNESCO World Heritage Sites Influence International Tourist Arrivals? Evidence from Italian Provincial Data

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates—through dynamic panel data techniques—the impact of Unesco World Heritage List (WHL) sites on international tourist arrivals. Relying on a sample of Italian provinces over the period 1997–2015, a positive effect of WHL inscriptions on foreign visitors’ attractiveness is found. These results provide a further contribution to the debate about the role of WHL in fostering tourism, and, differently from other analyses on the Italian regions, support the conclusion that the inscription in the list can play a role in promoting attractiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: our elaboration on Unesco World Heritage Centre data

Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data are downloadable by the ISTAT data warehouse (http://dati.istat.it/) by selecting “Servizi”, “Turismo”, and “Movimento dei client negli esercizi ricettivi- dati annuali” from the left menu on the website. Data before 2008 were directly collected at the ISTAT main building in Rome.

  2. The full list of Italian provinces is available at http://www.comuni-italiani.it/province.html.

  3. The eventual presence of cross-sectional dependence would affect the stationarity and cointegration tests’ results presented in Table 1.

References

  • Arezki, R., Cherif, R., & Piotrowski J. M. (2009). Tourism specialization and economic development: Evidence from the UNESCO World Heritage List. International Monetary Fund Working Paper, No. 09/176.

  • Bertacchini, E., Liuzza, C., & Meskell, L. (2017). Shifting the balance of power in the UNESCO World Heritage Committee: An empirical assessment. International Journal of Cultural Policy,23(3), 331–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertacchini, E., Liuzza, C., Meskell, L., & Saccone, D. (2016). The politicization of UNESCO World Heritage decision making. Public Choice,167(1–2), 95–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertacchini, E., & Saccone, D. (2012). Toward a political economy of World Heritage. Journal of Cultural Economics,36(4), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburne, E. F., & Frank, M. W. (2007). Estimation of nonstationary heterogeneous panels. The Stata Journal,7(2), 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics,87(1), 115–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, R. (2004). The effects of world heritage listing on tourism to Australian national parks. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 12(1), 70–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, R. (2017). Tourism and natural World Heritage: A complicated relationship. Journal of Travel Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517713723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caust, J., & Vecco, M. (2017). Is UNESCO World Heritage recognition a blessing or burden? Evidence from developing Asian countries. Journal of Cultural Heritage,27, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellini, R. (2011). Is UNESCO recognition effective in fostering tourism? A comment on Yang, Lin and Han. Tourism Management,32(2), 452–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, J., & Tapper, R. (2006). Tourism’s contribution to World Heritage Site management. In A. Leask & A. Fyall (Eds.), Managing world heritage sites (pp. 97–109). London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracolici, M. F., & Nijkamp, P. (2009). The attractiveness and competitiveness of tourist destinations: A study of Southern Italian regions. Tourism Management,30(3), 336–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuccia, T., & Cellini, R. (2007). Is cultural heritage really important for tourists? A contingent rating study. Applied Economics,39(2), 261–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuccia, T., Guccio, C., & Rizzo, I. (2016). The effects of UNESCO World Heritage List inscription on tourism destinations performance in Italian regions. Economic Modelling,53, 494–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuccia, T., Guccio, C., & Rizzo, I. (2017). UNESCO sites and performance trend of Italian regional tourism destinations: A two-stage DEA window analysis with spatial interaction. Tourism Economics,23(2), 316–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Hoyos, R. E., & Sarafidis, V. (2006). Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models. The Stata Journal,6(4), 482–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Simone, E. (2012). Non-residents’ attitudes towards heritage: Exploring tourist typologies by cultural consumption. Acta Turistica,24(2), 177–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Simone, E., & Di Maio, A. (2012). The global cultural good: An economic analysis of the World Heritage. JDyses,3(1), 16–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewar, K., Du Cros, H., & Li, W. (2012). The search for World Heritage brand awareness beyond the iconic heritage: A case study of the Historic Centre of Macao. Journal of Heritage Tourism,7(4), 323–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica,55(2), 251–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Steiner, L. (2011). World Heritage List: Does it make sense? International Journal of Cultural Policy,17(5), 555–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fyall, A., & Rakic, T. (2006). The future market for World Heritage sites. In A. Leask & A. Fyall (Eds.), Managing world heritage sites (pp. 159–175). London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica,37, 424–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guccio, C., Sacerdotti, S. L., & Rizzo, I. (2017). An empirical investigation of cultural travellers’ preferences and behaviours in a destination with mixed environmental features. In V. M. Ateca-Amestoy, et al. (Eds.), Enhancing participation in the arts in the EU (pp. 249–265). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, J. A. (1978). Specification test in econometrics. Econometrica,46(6), 1251–1271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. H., Tsaur, J. R., & Yang, C. H. (2012). Does world heritage list really induce more tourists? Evidence from Macau. Tourism Management,33(6), 1450–1457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimura, T. (2011). The impact of world heritage site designation on local communities—A case study of Ogimachi, Shirakawa-mura, Japan. Tourism Management,32(2), 288–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica,59, 1551–1580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics,90(1), 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, L. M., & Halpenny, E. A. (2014). Communicating the World Heritage brand: Visitor awareness of UNESCO’s World Heritage symbol and the implications for sites, stakeholders and sustainable management. Journal of Sustainable Tourism,22(5), 768–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landorf, C. (2009). Managing for sustainable tourism: A review of six cultural world heritage sites. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(1), 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leask, A. (2016). Visitor attraction management: A critical review of research 2009–2014. Tourism Management,57, 334–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics,108(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo Piccolo, F., Leone, D., & Pizzuto, P. (2012). The (controversial) role of the UNESCO WHL Management Plans in promoting sustainable tourism development. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events,4(3), 249–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, C. (2009). A panel unit root test with good power in small samples. Econometric Reviews,28(4), 295–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzini, E., Pisati, M., & Pompili, T. (2014). Determinants of international tourist choices in Italian provinces: A joint demand-supply approach with spatial effects. Paper presented at the 54th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: “Regional development and globalisation: Best practices”, 26–29 August 2014, St. Petersburg, Russia.

  • Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,61, 631–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrocu, E., & Paci, R. (2013). Different tourists to different destinations. Evidence from spatial interaction models. Tourism Management,39, 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L., Liuzza, C., Bertacchini, E., & Saccone, D. (2015). Multilateralism and UNESCO World Heritage: Decision-making, States Parties and political processes. International Journal of Heritage Studies,21(5), 423–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscardo, G. (1996). Mindful visitors: Heritage and tourism. Annals of tourism research,23(2), 376–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parenti, B., & De Simone, E. (2015). Explaining determinants of national UNESCO tentative lists: An empirical study. Applied Economics Letters,22(15), 1193–1198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patuelli, R., Mussoni, M., & Candela, G. (2013). The effects of World Heritage Sites on domestic tourism: A spatial interaction model for Italy. Journal of Geographical Systems,15(3), 369–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patuelli, R., Mussoni, M., & Candela, G. (2014). Cultural offer and distance in a spatial interaction model for tourism. Quaderni—Working Paper DSE, No. 943. https://doi.org/10.6092/unibo/amsacta/4019.

  • Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESIFO Working Paper, No. 1229.

  • Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica,74(4), 967–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1997). Estimating long-run relationships in dynamic heterogeneous panels. DAE Working Papers Amalgamated Series, No. 9721.

  • Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association,94, 621–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, R. P. (1995). Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics,68, 79–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poria, Y., Reichel, A., & Cohen, R. (2011). World Heritage site—Is it an effective brand name? A case study of a religious heritage site. Journal of Travel Research,50(5), 482–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribaudo, G., & Figini, P. (2017). The puzzle of tourism demand at destinations hosting UNESCO World Heritage Sites: An analysis of tourism flows for Italy. Journal of Travel Research,56(4), 521–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson, C. M., & Van der Merwe, C. D. (2016). Heritage tourism in the global South: Development impacts of the cradle of humankind world heritage site, South Africa. Local Economy, 31(1–2), 234–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J., & Silvanto, S. (2009). The World Heritage List: The making and management of a brand. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy,5(4), 290–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, Y. W., & Lin, H. L. (2014). Analysis of international tourist arrivals worldwide: The role of world heritage sites. Tourism Management,40, 46–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell, C., & Wilson, C. (2002). World heritage listing of Australian natural sites: tourism stimulus and its economic value. Economic analysis and policy, 32(2), 27–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Borg, J., Costa, P., & Gotti, G. (1996). Tourism in European heritage cities. Annals of Tourism Research,23(2), 306–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuepper, D., & Patry, M. (2017). The World Heritage list: Which sites promote the brand? A big data spatial econometrics approach. Journal of Cultural Economics,41(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. H., & Lin, H. L. (2011). Is UNESCO recognition effective in fostering tourism? A comment on Yang, Lin and Han: Reply. Tourism management,32(2), 455–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. H., & Lin, H. Y. (2014). Revisiting the relationship between World Heritage Sites and tourism. Tourism Economics,20(1), 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. H., Lin, H. L., & Han, C. C. (2010). Analysis of international tourist arrivals in China: The role of World Heritage Sites. Tourism Management,31(6), 827–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Fyall, A., & Zheng, Y. (2015). Heritage and tourism conflict within world heritage sites in China: A longitudinal study. Current Issues in Tourism,18(2), 110–136.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to prof. Ilde Rizzo, participants to IES 2017 conference in Naples and two anonymous referees for very helpful comments and suggestions. Rosaria Rita Canale and Elina De Simone acknowledge financial support from Parthenope University, Bando di sostegno alla ricerca, annualità 2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elina De Simone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Simone, E., Canale, R.R. & Di Maio, A. Do UNESCO World Heritage Sites Influence International Tourist Arrivals? Evidence from Italian Provincial Data. Soc Indic Res 146, 345–359 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1939-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1939-7

Keywords

Navigation