Abstract
The focus of this research was to examine the influence of gender on college students’ stalking scripts. One hundred fifty-four participants from a university located in the southern United States generated a narrative account of what occurs during stalking. Women were expected to generate more examples of ambiguous, non-aggressive, behaviors than were men, as well as to generate more coping strategies on the part of the target. Results overall revealed a high degree of similarity in content of generated stalking behaviors as a function of gender. However, women generated hyper-intimacy behaviors and mediated contact as part of their scripts significantly more often than did men. Women were also significantly more likely to generate a coping strategy than men.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelson, R. P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, 36, 715–729.
Amar, A. F. (2007). Behaviors that college women label as stalking or harassment. Journal of American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 13, 210–220.
Anderson, K. J., & Accomando, C. (1999). Madcap misogyny and romanticized victim-blaming: Discourses of stalking in There’s Something about Mary. Women and Language, 22, 24–28.
Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461–484.
Baldwin, M. W. (1995). Relational schemas and cognition in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 547–552.
Bartoli, A. M., & Clark, M. D. (2006). The dating game: Similarities and differences in dating scripts among college students. Sexuality and Culture, 10, 54–80.
Battaglia, D. M., Richard, F. D., Datteri, D. L., & Lord, C. G. (1998). Breaking up is (relatively) easy to do: A script for the dissolution of close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 829–845.
Baum, K., Catalano, S., Rand, M., & Rose, K. (2009). Stalking victimization in the United States. (NCJ Report 224527). Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Baumeister, R. F., Wotman, S. R., & Stillwell, A. M. (1993). Unrequited love: On heartbreak, anger, guilt, scriptlessness and humiliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 377–394.
Bjerregaard, B. (2002). An empirical study of stalking victimization. In K. E. Davis, I. H. Frieze, & R. D. Maiuros (Eds.), Stalking: Perspectives on victims and perpetrators (pp. 112–137). NY: Springer.
Bowleg, L., Lucas, K. J., & Tschann, J. M. (2004). “The ball was always in his court”: An exploratory analysis of relationship scripts, sexual scripts, and condom use among African-American women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 70–82.
Canadian Center for Justice Statistics. (2000). Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile. Ottawa: Ministry of the Interior.
Clark, M. D., & Carroll, M. H. (2008). Acquaintance rape scripts of women and men: Similarities and differences. Sex Roles, 58, 616–625.
Coleman, F. L. (1997). Stalking behavior and the cycle of domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 420–432.
Cupach, W. R., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1998). Obsessional relational intrusion and stalking. In W. R. Cupach & B. H. Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of close relationships (pp. 233–264). Mahwah: LEA.
Cupach, W. R., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2000). Obsessive relational intrusion: Incidence, perceived severity, and coping. Violence and Victims, 15, 357–372.
Cupach, W. R., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2004). The dark side of relational pursuit: From attraction to obsession and stalking. Mahwah: LEA.
Davis, K. E., Ace, A., & Andra, M. (2000). Stalking perpetrators and psychological maltreatment of partners: Anger-jealousy, attachment insecurity, need for control, and break-up context. Violence and Victims, 15, 407–425.
Davis, K. E., Frieze, I. H., & Maiuro, R. D. (Eds.). (2002). Stalking: Perspectives on victims and perpetrators. New York: Springer.
de Becker, G. (2002). I was trying to let him down easy. In J. B. Boon & L. Sheridan (Eds.), Stalking and psychosexual obsession: Psychological perspectives for prevention, policing, and treatment (pp. 35–47). West Sussex: Wiley.
Dennison, S. M. (2007). Interpersonal relationships and stalking: Indentifying when to intervene. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 353–367.
Dennison, S. M., & Thomson, D. M. (2000). Community perceptions of stalking: What are the fundamental concerns? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 7, 159–169.
Dennison, S. M., & Thomson, D. M. (2002). Identifying stalking: The relevance of intent in commonsense reasoning. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 543–561.
Dressing, H., Keuhner, C., & Gass, P. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and impact of stalking in a European population: Epidemiological data from a middle-sized German city. British Journal of Psychiatry, 30, 10–17.
Emerson, R. M., Ferris, K. O., & Gardner, C. B. (1998). On being stalked. Social Problems, 45, 289–313.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fremouw, W. J., Westrup, D., & Pennypacker, J. (1997). Stalking on campus: The prevalence and strategies for coping with stalking. Journal of Forensic Science, 42, 666–669.
Hills, A. M., & Taplin, J. L. (1998). Anticipated responses to stalking: Effect of threat and target- stalker relationship. Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 5, 139–146.
Holmberg, D., & MacKenzie, S. (2002). So far, so good: Scripts for romantic relationship development as predictors of relational well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 777–796.
Honeycutt, J. M., & Cantrill, J. G. (2001). Cognition, communication, and romantic relationships. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Honeycutt, J. M., Cantrill, J. G., & Allen, T. (1992). Memory structures for relational decay: A cognitive test of sequencing of de-escalating actions and stages. Human Communication Research, 18, 528–562.
Jagessar, J. D. H., & Sheridan, L. P. (2004). Stalking perceptions and experiences across two cultures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 97–119.
Jordon, C. E., Wilcox, P., & Pritchard, A. J. (2007). Stalking acknowledgement and reporting among college women experiencing intrusive behaviors: Implications for the emergence of a “classic stalking case. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 556–569.
Kahn, A. S., Mathie, V. A., & Torgler, C. (1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowledgment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 53–66.
Kraaij, V., Arensman, E., Garnefski, N., & Kremers, I. (2007). The role of cognitive coping in female victims of stalking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 1603–1612.
Krahé, B., Bieneck, S., & Scheinberger-Olwig, R. (2007). Adolescents’ sexual scripts: Schematic representations of consensual and nonconsensual heterosexual interactions. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 316–327.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Palarea, R. E., Cohen, J., & Rohling, M. L. (2002). Breaking up is hard to do: Unwanted pursuit behaviors following the dissolution of a romantic relationship. In K. E. Davis, I. H. Frieze, & R. D. Maiuro (Eds.), Stalking: Perspectives on victims and perpetrators (pp. 212–236). NY: Springer.
Lenton, A. P., & Bryan, A. (2005). An affair to remember: The role of sexual scripts in perceptions of sexual intent. Personal Relationships, 12, 483–498.
Littleton, H. L., & Axsom, D. (2003). Rape and seduction scripts of university students: Implications for rape attributions and unacknowledged rape. Sex Roles, 49, 465–475.
Lowney, K. S., & Best, J. (1995). Stalking strangers and lovers: Changing media typifications of a new crime problem. In J. Best (Ed.), Images of issues (pp. 33–55). New York: Walter de Gruyte, Inc.
Malamuth, N. M., & Brown, L. M. (1994). Sexually aggressive men’s perceptions of women’s communications: Testing three explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 699–712.
Meloy, J. R., & Gothard, S. (1995). A demographic and clinical comparison of obsessional followers and offenders with mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 258–263.
National Institute of Justice (1996). Domestic violence, stalking, and antistalking legislation (Annual Report to Congress under the Violence Against Women Act, NCJ 160943). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Pathé, M., & Mullen, P. E. (1997). The impact of stalkers on their victims. British Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 12–17.
Phillips, L., Quirk, R., Rosenfeld, B., & O’Connor, M. (2004). Is it stalking? Perceptions of stalking among college undergraduates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 73–96.
Pryor, J. B., & Merluzzi, T. V. (1985). The role of expertise in processing social interaction scripts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 362–379.
Purcell, R., Pathé, M., & Mullen, P. E. (2002). The prevalence and nature of stalking in the Australian commmunity. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 114–120.
Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1989). Young singles’ scripts for a first date. Gender and Society, 3, 258–268.
Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1993). Young singles contemporary dating scripts. Sex Roles, 28, 499–509.
Rummelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1988). Representation in memory. In R. C. Atkinson (Ed.), Steven’s handbook of experimental psychology: Vol 2. Learning and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 511–587). New York: Wiley.
Ryan, K. M. (1988). Rape and seduction scripts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 237–245.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Sheridan, L., Gillett, R., & Davies, G. (2000). Stalking: Seeking the victim’s perspective. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 6, 267–280.
Sheridan, L., Davies, G. M., & Boon, J. C. (2001). Stalking: Perceptions and prevalence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 151–167.
Sheridan, L., Gillett, R., & Davies, G. (2002). Perceptions and prevalence of stalking in a male sample. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 8, 289–310.
Sheridan, L., Gillett, R., Davies, G., Blaauw, G. M., & Patel, D. (2003). There’s no smoke without fire: Are male ex-partners perceived as more entitled to stalk than acquaintance or stranger stalkers? British Journal of Psychology, 94, 87–98.
Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120.
Sinclair, H. C., & Frieze, I. H. (2000). Initial courtship behavior and stalking: How should we draw the line? Victims and Violence, 15, 23–40.
Spitzberg, B. H. (2002). The tactical topography of stalking victimization and management. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 3, 261–288.
Spitzberg, B. H., & Cadiz, M. (2002). The media construction of stalking stereotypes. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 9, 128–149.
Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2003). What mad pursuit? Obsessive relational intrusion and stalking related phenomena. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 354–375.
Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2007). The state of the art of stalking: Taking stock of the emerging literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 64–86.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Tjaden, P., Thoennes, N., & Allison, C. J. (2000). Comparing stalking from Legal and victim perspectives. Violence and Victims, 15, 7–22.
White, J., Kowlaski, R. M., Lyndon, A., & Valentine, S. (2002). An integrative contextual developmental model of male stalking. In K. E. Davis, I. H. Frieze, & R. D. Maiuro (Eds.), Stalking: Perspectives on victims and perpetrators (pp. 163–185). NY: Springer.
Williams, S. L., & Frieze, I. H. (2005). Courtship behaviors, relationship violence, andbreakup persistence in college men and women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 248–257.
Yanowitz, K. L. (2006). Influence of gender and experience on college students’ stalking schemas. Violence and Victims, 21, 91–100.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank the reviewers and editors for their valuable feedback and comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yanowitz, K.L., Yanowitz, J.L. The Role of Gender in the Generation of Stalking Scripts. Sex Roles 66, 366–377 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9867-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9867-2