Skip to main content
Log in

The social value of productive entrepreneurship

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a critical contribution to the literature on social entrepreneurship, this paper provides structure and clarity to this concept, situating it within the context of charity and philanthropy as sources of social value creation. Identifying social entrepreneurship as creating both social and economic value, we discuss productive, unproductive, and destructive entrepreneurship in terms of social value creation. To illustrate these issues comparative case studies are presented on Microsoft Corporation and Grameen Bank. Even if their successes have been derived from different motivations, these highly innovative ventures have created significant economic and social value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Unless, of course, that is the specific analytical concern.

  2. Barring social critique and philosophical challenges.

  3. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/charity

  4. http://www.ashoka.org/.

  5. Thus, philanthropists are only minimally accountable to outsiders and can pursue social objectives as they choose or define.

  6. See the website (www.grameen-info.org) for a delineation of the Sixteen Decisions.

  7. In the Microcredit Summit Report (2007).

  8. E.g., studies conducted in 2000 by the Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society, the National Public Radio, Kaiser Family Foundation, and the Kennedy School of Government; and by the PEW Internet and American Life Project.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2006). Unbundling institutions. Journal of Political Economy, 113(5), 949–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., & Laszlo, S. (2010). The 2010 global entrepreneurship and development index. Chelthnam: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., & McNeely, C. L. (2008). Social entrepreneurship and the creation of social value: A conceptual prolegomenon. School of Public Policy Working Paper. Virginia: George Mason University.

  • Acs, Z. J., & Phillips, R. J. (2002). Entrepreneurship and philanthropy in American capitalism. Small Business Economics, 19(3), 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appleby, J. (2010). The relentless revolution: A history of capitalism. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashoka. (2010). What is a social entrepreneur? http://ashoka.org/social_entrepreneur. Accessed July 14, 2010.

  • Auerswald, P. (2009). Creating social value. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 7(2), 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerswald, P., & Acs, Z. J. (2009). Defining prosperity. The American Interest Magazine, May/June, 4–13.

  • Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, J. R. (2007). Philanthropy: Earned fortune. Hoover Digest, 4. http://www.hoover.org/publications/digest/10678111.html. Accessed January 18, 2008.

  • Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie, A. (1901). The gospel of wealth and other timely essays. New York: The Century Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chell, E. (2007). Social enterprise and entrepreneurship: Towards a convergent theory of the entrepreneurial process. The International Small Business Journal, 25(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. J. (1998). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspective, 24(3), 58–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dart, R. (2004). The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 14(4), 411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J.G. (2001). The meaning of social entrepreneurship. www.gpnet.com/perspective/social_entrepreneurship.htm. Accessed December 10, 2007.

  • Desai, S., & Acs, Z. J. (2008). Democratic capitalism and philanthropy in a global economy. In Z. J. Acs & R. Stough (Eds.), Public policy in an entrepreneurial economy (pp. 281–294). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, S. & Acs, Z. J. (2009). A theory of destructive entrepreneurship. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Working paper.

  • Desai, S., Acs, Z. J., & Weitzel, U. (2010). A model of destructive entrepreneurship. Helsinki: UNU-WIDER Working Paper No. 34.

  • Drayton, W. (2006). Everyone is a change maker: Social entrepreneurship’s ultimate goal. Innovations, 1(1), 80–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grameen Bank. (2008). GB at a glance. http://www.grameen.com/bank/GBGlance.htm. Accessed January 12, 2008.

  • Grameen Foundation. (2008). Grameen Foundation. www.grameen-info.org. Accessed January 12, 2008.

  • Grootaert, C. (1999). Social capital, household welfare and poverty in Indonesia. Local level institutions working paper no. 6, In Environmentally and socially sustainable development network, social development family. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Hashemi, S., Schuler, R., Sidney, S., & Riley, P. A. (1996). Rural credit programs and women’s empowerment in Bangladesh. World Development, 24(4), 635–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kistruck, G. M., & Beamish, P. W. (2010). The interplay of form, structure, and embeddedness in social intrapreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 735–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, P. (2006). Reshaping social entrepreneurship. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Spring, 46–51.

  • Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41, 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. R., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring.

  • Murphy, K. M. (1993). Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth? American Economic Review, 83, 409–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. M., Schleifer, A., et al. (1991). The allocation of talent: Implications for growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 503–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41, 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work, civic tradition in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, T. K., & Clohesy, S. F. (2001). Unleashing new resources and entrepreneurship for the common good: A philanthropic renaissance. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 32 (Summer).

  • Schramm, C. J. (2006). Law outside the market: The social utility of the private foundation. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 30(1), 356–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramm, C. J. (2010). All entrepreneurship is social. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring.

  • Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons, 48, 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. C., Moss, T. W., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2009). Research in social entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(2), 161–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzel, U., Urbig, D., Desai, S., Sanders, M., et al. (2010). The good the bad and the talented: Entrepreneurial talented and selfish behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(1), 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D., Shulman, J. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Philip Auerswald, Alex Acs, Sameeksha Desai, Siri Terjesen, Henry Etzkowitz, Joseph Sani, Catherine Rudder, seminar participants in the School of Public Policy at George Mason University, the Stern School of Business at New York University, and the Colloquium for Measuring the Social Value of Innovation at the University of Arizona, and three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments, insights, and contributions to this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zoltan J. Acs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Acs, Z.J., Boardman, M.C. & McNeely, C.L. The social value of productive entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 40, 785–796 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9396-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9396-6

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation