Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

NRG oncology RTOG 9006: a phase III randomized trial of hyperfractionated radiotherapy (RT) and BCNU versus standard RT and BCNU for malignant glioma patients

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From 1990 to 1994, patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas were enrolled and randomized between hyperfractionated radiation (HFX) of 72.0 Gy in 60 fractions given twice daily and 60.0 Gy in 30 fractions given once daily. All patients received 80 mg/m2 of 1,3 bis(2 chloroethyl)-1 nitrosourea on days 1–3 q8 weeks for 1 year. Patients were stratified by age, KPS, and histology. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with secondary endpoints including progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity. Out of the 712 patients accrued, 694 (97.5%) were analyzable cases (350 HFX, 344 standard arm). There was no significant difference between the arms on overall acute or late treatment-related toxicity. No statistically significant effect for HFX, as compared to standard therapy, was found on either OS, with a median survival time (MST) of 11.3 versus 13.1 months (p = 0.20) or PFS, with a median PFS time of 5.7 versus 6.9 months (p = 0.18). The treatment effect on OS remained insignificant based on the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 1.16; p = 0.0682). When OS was analyzed by histology subgroup there was also no significant difference between the two arms for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (MST: 10.3 vs. 11.2 months; p = 0.34), anaplastic astrocytoma (MST: 69.8 vs. 50.0 months; p = 0.91) or anaplastic oligodendroglioma (MST: 92.1 vs. 66.5 months; p = 0.33). Though this trial provided many invaluable secondary analyses, there was no trend or indication of a benefit to HFX radiation to 72.0 Gy in any subset of malignant glioma patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walker MD, Alexander E Jr, Hunt WE, MacCarty CS, Mahaley MS Jr, Mealey J Jr, Norrell HA, Owens G, Ransohoff J, Wilson CB, Gehan EA, Strike TA (1978) Evaluation of BCNU and/or radiotherapy in the treatment of anaplastic gliomas. J Neurosurg 49(3):333–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Walker MD, Green SB, Byar DP, Alexander E Jr, Batzdorf U, Brooks WH, Hunt WE, MacCarty CS, Mahaley MS Jr, Mealey J Jr, Owens G, Ransohoff J 2nd, Robertson JT, Shapiro WR, Smith KR Jr, Wilson CB, Strike TA (1980) Randomized comparisons of radiotherapy and nitrosoureas for the treatment of malignant glioma after surgery. N Engl J Med 303(23):1323–1329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Walker MD, Strike TA, Sheline GE (1979) An analysis of dose-effect relationship in the radiotherapy of malignant gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 5(10):1725–1731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Withers HR (1985) Biologic basis for altered fractionation schemes. Cancer 55(S9):2086–2095

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thames HD Jr, Peters LJ, Withers HR, Fletcher GH (1983) Accelerated fractionation vs hyperfractionation: rationales for several treatments per day. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 9(2):127–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sheline GE, Wara WM, Smith V (1980) Therapeutic irradiation and brain injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 6(9):215–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schultheiss TE, Kun LE, Ang KK, Stephens LC (1995) Radiation response of the central nervous system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31(5):1093–1112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fowler JF (1989) The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 62(740):679–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawrence YR, Li XA, el Naqa I, Hahn CA, Marks LB, Merchant TE, Dicker AP (2010) Radiation dose–volume effects in the brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76(3):S20–S27

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Stupp R et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):987–996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson DF et al (1993) Hyperfractionated radiation therapy and bis-chlorethyl nitrosourea in the treatment of malignant glioma—possible advantage observed at 72.0 Gy in 1.2 Gy BID fractions: report of the radiation therapy oncology group protocol 8302. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 25(2):193–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Werner-Wasik M, Scott CB, Nelson DF, Gaspar LE, Murray KJ, Fischbach JA, Nelson JS, Weinstein AS, Curran WJ Jr (1996) Final report of a phase I/II trial of hyperfractionated and accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy with carmustine for adults with supratentorial malignant gliomas: radiation therapy oncology group study 83-02. Cancer 77(8):1535–1543

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Curran W et al (1996) No survival benefit of hyperfractionated radiotherapy (RT) to 72.0 Gy and carmustine versus standard RT and carmustine for malignant glioma patients: preliminary results of RTOG 90-06. J Clin Oncol 15(Suppl):154

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53(282):457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (1980) Statistical analysis of failure time data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B 34:187–202

    Google Scholar 

  17. Curran WJ Jr et al (1993) Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors in three radiation therapy oncology group malignant glioma trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(9):704–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Scott CB, Curran W, Yung W, Scarantino C, Urtasun R, Movsas B, Jones C, Simpson J, Fischbach A, Petito C, Nelson J (1998) Long term results of RTOG 9006: a randomized trial of hyperfractioanted radiotherapy (RT) to 72.0 Gy and carmustine vs. standard RT and carmustine for malignant glioma patients with emphasis on anaplastic astrocytoma patients (Abstract). InProc Am Soc Clin Oncol 17:401

  19. Scott CB, Scarantino C, Urtasun R, Movsas B, Jones CU, Simpson JR, Fischbach AJ, Curran WJ Jr (1998) Validation and predictive power of radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis classes for malignant glioma patients: a report using RTOG 90-06. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40(1):51–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lawrence YR, Wang M, Dicker AP, Andrews D, Curran WJ Jr, Michalski JM, Souhami L, Yung WK, Mehta M (2011) Early toxicity predicts long-term survival in high-grade glioma. Br J Cancer 104(9):1365–1371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Choucair A, Moughan J, Schultz C, Schulsinger A, Mehta M, Curran W (2011) Prognostic value of H-MLH1 after adjusting for RPA class in GBM patients. Front Biosci 3:1182–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li J, Wang M, Won M, Shaw EG, Coughlin C, Curran WJ Jr, Mehta MP (2011) Validation and simplification of the radiation therapy oncology group recursive partitioning analysis classification for glioblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81(3):623–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Blumenthal DT, Won M, Mehta MP, Curran WJ, Souhami L, Michalski JM, Rogers CL, Corn BW (2009) Short delay in initiation of radiotherapy may not affect outcome of patients with glioblastoma: a secondary analysis from the radiation therapy oncology group database. J Clin Oncol 27(5):733–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chakravarti A, Seiferheld W, Tu X, Wang H, Zhang HZ, Ang KK, Hammond E, Curran W Jr, Mehta M (2005) Immunohistochemically determined total epidermal growth factor receptor levels not of prognostic value in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: report from the radiation therapy oncology group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62(2):318–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chinnaiyan P, Wang M, Rojiani AM, Tofilon PJ, Chakravarti A, Ang KK, Zhang HZ, Hammond E, Curran W Jr, Mehta MP (2008) The prognostic value of nestin expression in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: report from the radiation therapy oncology group. Radiat Oncol 3:32

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lustig RA, Scott CB, Curran WJ (2004) Does stereotactic eligibility for the treatment of glioblastoma cause selection bias in randomized studies? Am J Clin Oncol 27(5):516–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Prados MD, Scott C, Curran WJ Jr, Nelson DF, Leibel S, Kramer S (1999) Procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy for anaplastic astrocytoma: a retrospective review of radiation therapy oncology group protocols comparing survival with carmustine or PCV adjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 17(11):3389–3395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by grants U10CA21661 (RTOG-Ops-Stat), U10CA180868 (NRG Oncology Operations), U10CA180822 (NRG Oncology SDMC), U10CA37422 (CCOP), from the National Cancer Institute (NCI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arif N. Ali.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Movsas reports research grants from Varian, Inc. and Philips, Inc. Drs. Chen and Penas-Prado report grants from NCI. Dr. Jones reports receiving speaker fees from Lilly. Dr. Yung reports research grant to his institution from RTOG and fees for serving on scientific advisory board of DNAtrix.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, A.N., Zhang, P., Yung, W.K.A. et al. NRG oncology RTOG 9006: a phase III randomized trial of hyperfractionated radiotherapy (RT) and BCNU versus standard RT and BCNU for malignant glioma patients. J Neurooncol 137, 39–47 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2558-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2558-x

Keywords

Navigation