Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of autologous fibrin glue versus nylon sutures for securing conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the safety, operating time, postoperative ocular signs, symptoms, overall patient satisfaction, complications rate and recurrence rate of autologous fibrin glue (AFG) and nylon suturing (NS) for attaching conjunctival autografts in pterygium surgery.

Methods

A prospective, randomized, interventional study was performed among 120 patients (120 eyes) with primary pterygium. Superior conjunctival autograft was harvested and transferred on to bare sclera after pterygium excision. For attaching the autograft, AFG (n = 60 eyes) and NS (n = 60 eyes) were used. The patients were followed up for 12 months. The groups were compared for the safety, operative time, postoperative ocular signs, symptoms, overall patient satisfaction, recurrence and complications rate.

Results

All conjunctival autografts in both groups were successfully attached. The average operating time for the AFG group was significantly shorter (P < 0.001). Postoperative symptoms were fewer for the AFG group than the suture group. After 12 months of follow-up, no recurrence was reported for the AFG group, but 8.3% of patients experienced recurrence in the NS group.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated the superiority of AFG to NS in saving operating time and elimination of recurrence without any complications in pterygium surgery. AFG can obviate the need for suturing and increases the viability of tissue flaps. Additional studies are necessary to determine the long-term effects considering factors such as primary or recurrent status of pterygium, age and sex of patient, dose and duration of treatment for mitomycin C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu L, Wu J, Geng J, Yuan Z, Huang D (2013) Geographical prevalence and risk factors for pterygium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 3(11):e003787

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Detorakis ET, Spandidos DA (2009) Pathogenetic mechanisms and treatment options for ophthalmic pterygium: trends and perspectives (Review). Int J Mol Med 23(4):439–447 Epub 2009/03/17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chui J, Di Girolamo N, Wakefield D, Coroneo MT (2008) The pathogenesis of pterygium: current concepts and their therapeutic implications. Ocul Surf 6(1):24–43 Epub 2008/02/12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaufman SC, Jacobs DS, Lee WB, Deng SX, Rosenblatt MI, Shtein RM (2013) Options and adjuvants in surgery for pterygium: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 120(1):201–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ayala M (2008) Results of pterygium surgery using a biologic adhesive. Cornea 27(6):663–667 Epub 2008/06/27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pan HW, Zhong JX, Jing CX (2011) Comparison of fibrin glue versus suture for conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 118(6):1049–1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Foroutan AAB, Fariba A, Ghaempanah MJA, Eshghi PA, Amirizadeh NA, Sianat HA, Foroutan P (2011) Efficacy of autologous fibrin glue for primary pterygium surgery with conjunctival autograft. Iran J Ophthalmol 23(1):39–47

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hall RC, Logan AJ, Wells AP (2009) Comparison of fibrin glue with sutures for pterygium excision surgery with conjunctival autografts. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 37(6):584–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong VA, Law FC (1999) Use of mitomycin C with conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery in Asian-Canadians. Ophthalmology 106(8):1512–1515 Epub 1999/08/12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Riordan-Eva P, Kielhorn I, Ficker LA, Steele AD, Kirkness CM (1993) Conjunctival autografting in the surgical management of pterygium. Eye (Lond Engl) 7(Pt 5):634–638 Epub 1993/01/01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Anbari AA (2013) Autologous cryoprecipitate for attaching conjunctival autografts after pterygium excision. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 20(3):239–243 Epub 2013/09/10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Koranyi G, Seregard S, Kopp ED (2005) The cut-and-paste method for primary pterygium surgery: long-term follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83(3):298–301 Epub 2005/06/14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bahar I, Weinberger D, Gaton DD, Avisar R (2007) Fibrin glue versus vicryl sutures for primary conjunctival closure in pterygium surgery: long-term results. Curr Eye Res 32(5):399–405 Epub 2007/05/22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Karalezli A, Kucukerdonmez C, Akova YA, Altan-Yaycioglu R, Borazan M (2008) Fibrin glue versus sutures for conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery: a prospective comparative study. Br J Ophthalmol 92(9):1206–1210 Epub 2008/07/16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mittermayr R, Morton T, Hofmann M, Helgerson S, van Griensven M, Redl H (2008) Sustained (rh)VEGF(165) release from a sprayed fibrin biomatrix induces angiogenesis, up-regulation of endogenous VEGF-R2, and reduces ischemic flap necrosis. Wound Rep Regen 16(4):542–550 Epub 2008/05/23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Findikcioglu F, Findikcioglu K, Yavuzer R, Lortlar N, Atabay K (2012) Effect of intraoperative platelet-rich plasma and fibrin glue application on skin flap survival. J Craniofac Surg 23(5):1513–1517 Epub 2012/09/15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Joch C (2003) The safety of fibrin sealants. Cardiovasc Surg (Lond Engl) 11(Suppl 1):23–28 Epub 2003/07/19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Starck T, Kenyon KR, Serrano F (1991) Conjunctival autograft for primary and recurrent pterygia: surgical technique and problem management. Cornea 10(3):196–202 Epub 1991/05/01

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar N, Al Sabti K (2010) Fibrin glue in ophthalmology. Indian J Ophthalmol 58(2):176 Epub 2010/03/03

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Romano V, Cruciani M, Conti L, Fontana L (2016) Fibrin glue versus sutures for conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD011308 Epub 2016/12/03

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alvarenga LS (2005) Comments on using fibrin glue in pterygium surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 89(3):392; author reply. Epub 2005/02/22

  22. Wai Y, Tsui V, Peng Z, Richardson R, Oreopoulos D, Tarlo SM (2003) Anaphylaxis from topical bovine thrombin (Thrombostat) during haemodialysis and evaluation of sensitization among a dialysis population. Clin Exp Allergy 33(12):1730–1734 Epub 2003/12/06

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Spencer HT, Hsu JT, McDonald DR, Karlin LI (2012) Intraoperative anaphylaxis to gelatin in topical hemostatic agents during anterior spinal fusion: a case report. Spine J 12(8):e1–e6 Epub 2012/10/02

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siamak Zarei-Ghanavati.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no financial interest relevant to the materials presented in this manuscript.

Ethical issue

The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of Declaration of Helsinki 1996 version and Good Clinical Practice standards. The study protocol was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alamdari, D.H., Sedaghat, MR., Alizadeh, R. et al. Comparison of autologous fibrin glue versus nylon sutures for securing conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery. Int Ophthalmol 38, 1219–1224 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0585-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0585-4

Keywords

Navigation