Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Agency in the archive: a model for participatory recordkeeping

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archival Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To date, definitions of participatory archiving or participatory recordkeeping have been elusive. The use of the single term ‘participatory’ for disparate and seemingly contradictory activities raises a number of definitional and practical issues. This paper is an attempt to address these issues by describing the various manifestations of such engagement in terms of a consistent framework; answering Huvila’s call for “a model of different degrees of participation in archival contexts” (2011, p. 1). Literary warrant was employed to explore models of participatory recordkeeping, and the ‘ladder of participation’ approach was shown to have a number of shortcomings when applied to recordkeeping informatics. This linear, meta-narrative approach was rejected in favour of a continuum approach to modelling participation. Based on the Records Continuum Model, a Participatory Recordkeeping Continuum Model is proposed that describes the distanciation of participants from the activities represented by records. A number of examples of participatory engagement reported in the literature including community archiving, Archive 2.0 initiatives, traditional researcher engagement, and participatory recordkeeping were examined and successfully described using the model. The paper concludes that any treatment of participatory engagement with records that attempts to solve problems of severe disenfranchisement requires a continuum approach—the Records Continuum Model to deal with the complexity of records and a Participatory Recordkeeping Continuum Model to understand the complexity of participatory agency. The Participatory Recordkeeping Continuum Model can be used to not only situate existing literature, projects, and systems, but to determine future system requirements for participatory engagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ancestry.com (2015) Genealogy, family trees & family history records at Ancestry.com.au. http://www.ancestry.com.au. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Anderson S, Allen R (2009) Envisioning the archival commons. Am Arch 72(2):383–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson IG (2008) Necessary but not sufficient: modelling online archive development in the UK. D-Lib Mag 14(1). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january08/anderson/01anderson.html. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Ara Irititja Project (2011) The Ara Irititja Project. http://www.irititja.com/index.html. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am I Planners 35(4):216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attwood B (2008) In the age of testimony: the stolen generations narrative, “distance”, and public history. Public Cult 20(1):75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australia Department of Social Services (2015) Access to Records by Forgotten Australians and Former Child Migrants: Access Principles for Records Holders, Best Practice Guidelines in providing access to records. https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/downloadfile.ashx?guid=5177243f-0484-48ab-9984-46a07e3e1f04&type=exhibit&filename=DHS.3148.001.0079&fileextension=pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Australia Parliament Senate Community Affairs References Committee, Hutchins SP, McLucas J (2004) Forgotten Australians: a report on Australians who experienced institutional or out-of-home care as children. Community Affairs References Committee, Canberra. http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs/Completed_inquiries/2004-07/inst_care/report/index. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Ayres ML (2013) Singing for their supper: Trove, Australian newspapers, and the crowd. FLA-WIC 2013: future libraries: infinite possibilities. 17–23 Aug 2013, Singapore

  • Bastian JA (2002) Taking custody, giving access: a postcustodial role for a new century. Archivaria 53:76–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie RE (2009) The poisoned madeleine: Stasi files as evidence and history. Faculty Inf Quart 1(3). http://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/fiq/article/view/15452. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Biggs SD, Hariri G, Senanayake Y et al (1989) Resource-poor farmer participation in research: a synthesis of experiences from nine national agricultural research systems (No. 0534-5391) ISNAR, The Hague (Países Bajos)

  • Bingo S (2011) Of provenance and privacy: using contextual integrity to define third-party privacy. Am Arch 74(2):506–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais G, Enns D (1990) From paper archives to people archives: public programming in the management of archives. Archivaria 31(1):1990–1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabham DC (2012) The myth of amateur crowds: a critical discourse analysis of crowdsourcing coverage. Inf Commun Soc 15(3):394–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone K (2015) Artists in the archive: an exploratory study of the Artist-in-Residence Program at the City of Portland Archives & Records Center. Archivaria 79:27–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Castan M, Debeljak J (2012) Indigenous peoples’ human rights and the Victorian Charter: a framework for reorienting recordkeeping and archival practice. Arch Sci 12(2):213–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell M (2014) Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Arch Sci 14(3–4):307–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecez-Kecmanovic D, Galliers RD, Henfridsson O, Newell S, Vidgen R (2014) The sociomateriality of information systems: current status, future directions. MIS Quart 38(3):809–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (2006) Participatory mapping and geographic information systems: whose map? Who is empowered and who disempowered? Who gains and who loses? Electro J Inf Syst Dev Ctries 25(2):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Christen K (2008) Archival challenges and digital solutions in aboriginal Australia. SAA Archeol Rec 8(2):21–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Christen K (2011) Opening archives: respectful repatriation. Am Arch 74(1):185–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook T (2013) Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms. Arch Sci 13(2–3):95–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall A (2008) Unpacking “participation”: models, meanings and practices. Community Dev J 43(3):269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison T, McKemmish S, Waugh A, Eades J (2012) The Koorie archival system: reconciling the official record with community knowledge. http://ccnr.infotech.monash.edu/assets/docs/prato2012docs/denison-indig.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Deshler D, Sock D (1985) Community development participation: a concept review of the international literature. International league for social commitment in adult education. July 1985 Ljungskile Sweden, pp 22–26

  • Duff WM, Harris V (2002) Stories and names: archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings. Arch Sci 2(3–4):263–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff WM, Monks-Leeson E, Galey A (2012) Contexts built and found: a pilot study on the process of archival meaning-making. Arch Sci 12(1):69–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durant L (1998) Diplomatics, new uses for an old science. Scarecrow Press, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranti L (1996) Archives as place. Arch Manuscr 24(2):242–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranti L, Franks PC (2015) Encyclopedia of archival science. Rowman & Littlefield, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans J, McKemmish S, Daniels E, McCarthy G (2015) Self-determination and archival autonomy: advocating activism. Arch Sci 15(4):337–368. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9244-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eveleigh A (2015) Crowding out the Archivist? Implications of online user participation for archival theory and practice. PhD thesis UCL

  • Farrington J, Bebbington A (1993) Reluctant partners? Non-governmental organizations, the state and sustainable agricultural development. Psychology Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Find and Connect Web Resource Project (2013) Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. https://childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/getattachment/6df4a419-d711-494f-b4b5-29663e33956f/21-Find-and-Connect-Web-Resource-Project. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Flinn A (2010) An attack on professionalism and scholarship? Democratising archives and the production of knowledge. Ariadne. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue62/flinn. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Flinn A (2011) Archival activism: independent and community-led archives, radical public history and the heritage professions. InterActions: UCLA J Educ Inf Stud 7(2) Article 6. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9pt2490x. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Gibbons L (2015) Culture in the continuum: YouTube, small stories and memory-making. PhD thesis Monash University

  • Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland A (2013) Conceptualizing twenty-first century archives (Chapter 1). Society of Am Archivists, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland A (2014a) Acknowledging, respecting, enfranchising, liberating and protecting: a platform for radical archival description. New York University’s Asian/Pacific/American Institute: Radical Archives Conference April 2014

  • Gilliland A (2014b) Moving past: probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia. Arch Sci 14(3–4):249–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland A (2015) Permeable binaries, societal grand challenges, and the roles of the twenty-first century archival and recordkeeping profession. In: Archifacts, ARANZ conference—footprints in space and time 2015, Auckland

  • Gilliland A, McKemmish S (2014) The role of participatory archives in furthering human rights, reconciliation and recovery. In: Atlanti: review for modern archival theory and practice, Archivio di Stato Trieste

  • Hall EB (1907) The friends of Voltaire. Putnam’s, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Haythornthwaite CA (2009) Online knowledge crowds and communities. International conference on knowledge communities, February 2009, Center for Basque Studies, University of Nevada

  • Hopkins I (2008) Places from which to speak. J Soc Arch 29(1):83–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys C, Kertesz M (2012) ‘Putting the heart back into the record’: personal records to support young people in care. Adoption Fostering 36(1):27–39. doi:10.1177/030857591203600105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huvila I (2008) Participatory archive: towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualisation of records management. Arch Sci 8(1):15–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huvila I (2011, August) What is a participatory archive? For real(?) Isto Huvila. http://www.istohuvila.se/what-participatory-archive-real. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Huvila I (2015) The unbearable lightness of participating? Revisiting the discourses of “participation” in archival literature. J Doc 71(2):358–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacovino L (2006) Recordkeeping, ethics and law regulatory models, participant relationships and rights and responsibilities in the online world. http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=303603. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Iacovino L (2015) Shaping and reshaping cultural identity and memory: maximising human rights through a participatory archive. Arch Manuscr 43(1):29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO15489-1 (2001) Information and documentation—records management. Part 1 general

  • Kennedy M (2009) Cautionary tales: Archives 2.0 and the diplomatic historian. Ariadne 61. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue61/kennedy. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Ketelaar E (2012) Truths, memories and histories in the archives of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. In van der Wilt HG, Vervliet J, Sluiter GK, Houwink ten Cate JTM (eds) The genocide convention: the legacy of 60 years, conference in commemoration of the 60th birthday of the Genocide Convention. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden, p 201

  • Krause M, Yakel E (2007) Interaction in virtual archives: the polar bear expedition digital collections next generation finding aid. Am Arch 70(2):282–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehane R (2006) Allowing talking in virtual reading rooms: user-‐contributed content and online archive finding aids. ALIA New Librarians’ Symposium. Sydney, Australia. http://conferences.alia.org.au/newlibrarian2006/programme_files/lehane_paper.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Lemieux V (2014) Toward a “third order” archival interface: research notes on some theoretical and practical implications of visual explorations in the Canadian context of financial electronic records. Archivaria 78 (Fall 2014):53–93

  • Liew CL, Wellington S, Oliver G, Perkins R (2015) Social media in libraries and archives: applied with caution/Les médias sociaux dans les bibliothèques et les archives: appliqués avec prudence. Can J Inf Lib Sci 39(3):377–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard J-F (1984) The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge (vol 10). U of Minnesota Press, Minnesota

  • McCarthy G, Evans J (2012) Principles for archival information services in the public domain. Arch Manuscr 40(1):54–67. doi:10.1080/01576895.2012.670872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKemmish S (1994) Are records ever actual? In: McKemmish S, Piggott M (eds) The records continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives: first fifty years. Ancora Press Clayton, pp 187–203

  • McKemmish S (1996) Evidence of me. Arch Manuscr 24(1):28–45

    Google Scholar 

  • McKemmish S (2001) Placing records continuum theory and practice. Arch Sci 1(4):333–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKemmish S, Acland G, Cumming K, Reed B, Ward N (2000) Australian Recordkeeping Metadata Schema. SPIRT Research team. http://www.infotech.monash.edu.au/research/groups/rcrg/projects/spirt/deliverables/rkmsgen-tech-intro.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • McKemmish S, Faulkhead S, Russell L (2011) Distrust in the archive: reconciling records. Arch Sci 11(3–4):211–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller P (2000) Interoperability. What is it and why should I want it? Ariadne 24(10)

  • National Archives of Australia (2013) The National Archives digitisation service - Fact sheet 249. http://www.naa.gov.au/collection/fact-sheets/fs249.aspx. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • National Archives of Australia (2015) Discovering Anzacs. http://discoveringanzacs.naa.gov.au. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • National Library of Australia (2015) Home - Trove. Trove. http://trove.nla.gov.au. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Nuclear Energy Agency (2004) Stakeholder involvement techniques: a short guide and annotated bibliography. NEA, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • NZ Micrographic Services Ltd (2014) Recollect » Recollect. http://recollect.co.nz. Accessed 16 Dec. 2015

  • O’Neill C, Selakovic V, Tropea R (2012) Access to records for people who were in out-of-home care: moving beyond ‘third dimension’ archival practice. Arch Manuscr 40(1):29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver G, Evans J, Reed B, Upward F (2009) Achieving the right balance: recordkeeping informatics, part 1. IQ: RIM Q 25(4):18

  • Oliver G, Evans J, Reed B, Upward F (2009) Achieving the right balance: recordkeeping informatics, part 2. IQ: RIM Q 26(1):42

  • Ouksel AM, Sheth A (1999) Semantic interoperability in global information systems. ACM Sigmod Rec 28(1):5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PACG (2011) Educating for the archival multiverse. Am Archt 74:69–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer J (2009) Archives 2.0: If we build it, will they come? Ariadne 60:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson L (2007) Protocols for Native American archival materials. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Indigenous Librarians Forum. Brisbane, Australia: Aboriginal; Torres Strait Islander Library Information Resource Network Inc (ATSILIRN)

  • Phillips MS (2004) Distance and Historical Representation. Hist Workshop J 57:123–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Records Continuum Research Group (2015) Always becoming symposium. http://recordscontinuum.info/wiki/AlwaysBecomingSymposium. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  • Reed B (2005a) Beyond perceived boundaries: imagining the potential of pluralised recordkeeping. Arch Manuscr 33(1):176

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed B (2005b) Reading the records continuum: Interpretations and explorations. Arch Manuscr 33(1):18

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridolfo J, Hart-Davidson W, McLeod M (2010) Balancing stakeholder needs: archive 2.0 as community-centred design. Ariadne 63. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue63/ridolfo-et-al. Accessed 15 Dec 2015

  • Ross F, McKemmish S, Faulkhead S (2006) Indigenous knowledge and the archives: designing trusted archival systems for Koorie communities. Arch Manuscr 34(2):112

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell L (2005) Indigenous knowledge and archives: Accessing hidden history and understandings. Aust Acad Res Libr 36(2):161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick J M (2008) Let me tell you about my grandpa: a content analysis of user annotations to online archival collections. Conference of Society of American Archivists, 13 Aug. 2009 http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue62/flinn#sthash.uvntZi5X.dpuf. http://www.slideshare.net/jmsedgwick/let-me-tell-you-about-my-grandpa-a-content-analysis-of-user-annotations-to-online-archival-collections#sthash.uvntZi5X.dpuf. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Sexton A, Turner C, Yeo G, Hocke S (2004) Understanding users: a prerequisite for developing new technologies. J Soc Arch 25(1):33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shilton K, Srinivasan R (2007) Participatory appraisal and arrangement for multicultural archival collections. Archivaria 63:87

    Google Scholar 

  • State Library of Western Australia (2015) Storylines. Storylines. http://www.slwa.wa.gov.au/for/indigenous_australians/storylines. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Stevenson A (2010) Oxford dictionary of English. http://www.oxfordreference.com/search?source=%2F10.1093%2Facref%2F9780199571123.001.0001%2Facref-9780199571123&q=pluralism. Accessed 16 Feb 2016

  • Svahn F, Henfridsson O, Yoo Y (2009) A threesome dance of agency: mangling the sociomateriality of technological regimes in digital innovation. In: ICIS 2009 proceedings

  • The Mukurtu Team (2015) Mukurtu CMS. http://www.mukurtu.org/. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Theimer K (2011) What is the meaning of archives 2.0? Am Arch 74(1):58–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Trust and Technology Project (2008) Trust & Technology Project final report. http://infotech.monash.edu/research/about/centres/cosi/projects/trust/final-report/. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • United Nations Commission on Human Rights (2007) United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. United Nations, New York http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  • Upward F (1996) Structuring the records continuum-part one: postcustodial principles and properties. Arch Manuscr 24(2):268–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Upward F (1997) Structuring the records continuum part two: structuration theory and recordkeeping. Arch Manuscr 25(1):10–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Upward F (2000) Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond—a personal reflection. RecManag J 10(3):115–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Upward F (2005a) Continuum mechanics and memory banks, part 1. Multi-polarity. Arch Manuscr 33(1):84–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Upward F (2005b) Continuum mechanics and memory banks, part 2. The making of culture. Arch Manuscr 33(2):18

    Google Scholar 

  • Upward, F (2009) Managing the flicker. Continuum concepts and the formation of archives. PhD thesis, Monash University

  • Upward F, McKemmish S, Reed B (2011) Archivists and changing social and information spaces: a continuum approach to recordkeeping and archiving in online cultures. Archivaria 72(Fall):197–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Upward F, Reed B, Oliver G, Evans J (2013) Recordkeeping informatics: re-figuring a discipline in crisis with a single minded approach. Rec Manag J 23(1):37–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby S (2007) Complexity theory, systems theory, and multiple intersecting social inequalities. Philos Soc Sci 37(4):449–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wand Y, Weber R (1995) On the deep structure of information systems. Inf Syst J 5(3):203–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White SC (1996) Depoliticising development: the uses and abuses of participation. Dev Pract 6(1):6–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson K (2013) Populations and samples. In: Williamson K, Johanson G (eds) Research methods: information, systems and contexts. Tilde University Press, Prahran, pp 331–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JZ, Golding F (2016) Latent scrutiny: personal archives as perpetual mementos of the official gaze. Arch Sci 16(1):93–109. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9255-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo G (2007) Concepts of record (1): evidence, information, and persistent representations. Am Arch 70(2):315–343

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Monash University, P.O. Box 197, Caulfield East, VIC, 3145, Australia

    Gregory Rolan

Authors
  1. Gregory Rolan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory Rolan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rolan, G. Agency in the archive: a model for participatory recordkeeping. Arch Sci 17, 195–225 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9267-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9267-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation