Skip to main content
Log in

Provider selection and task allocation in telecommunications with QoS degradation policy

  • Data Mining and Analytics
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The information age that we are living in is characterized by exponentially increasing needs and corresponding means to access, transmit and use data in a variety of business settings. Fast growing demand, which is translated to market opportunities, has led to the emergence of many new and well-established firms entering into the telecommunications market, resulting in a crowded, highly competitive business environment with numerous providers and carriers offering a wide range of data services. Today’s firms use telecommunication networks in a variety of ways to carry out their daily communications such as video conferencing, voice over IP and other data-intensive transmissions. In this paper, we report on a study in which we investigate a cost optimization problem that a firm encounters when acquiring network bandwidth from a telecommunication market that consists of many backbone providers offering different combinations of pricing policies and quality of service (QoS) levels. After the acquisition of network resources (bandwidth), firms allocate these resources to their daily data transmissions (tasks) according to the QoS requirement of the tasks. In an optimal allocation scheme, it is generally presumed that each task has to be assigned to a network resource which is capable of providing an equal or higher level of QoS than required by the task. However, it is shown with the proposed heuristic approach (presented herein) that QoS degradations during the allocation of tasks can lead to more favorable outcomes, especially when certain cost penalty policies are applied to the reduction of QoS requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdrabou, A., & Zhuang, W. (2008). Stochastic delay guarantees and statistical call admission control for IEEE 802.11 single-hop ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7, 3972–3981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahluwalia, P., & Varshney, U. (2007). Managing end-to-end quality of service in multiple heterogeneous wireless networks. International Journal of Network Management, 17, 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahluwalia, P., & Varshney, U. (2009). Composite quality of service and decision making perspectives in wireless networks. Decision Support Systems, 46, 542–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhavan-Tabatabaei, R., Bolívar, M. A., Hincapie, J. A., & Medaglia, A. L. (2014). On the optimal parking lot subscription policy problem: A hybrid simulation-optimization approach. Annals of Operations Research, 222, 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audestad, J.-A., Gaivoronski, A. A., & Werner, A. (2006). Extending the stochastic programming framework for the modeling of several decision makers: Pricing and competition in the telecommunication sector. Annals of Operations Research, 142, 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baecker, P. N., Grass, G., & Hommel, U. (2010). Business value and risk in the presence of price controls: An option-based analysis of margin squeeze rules in the telecommunications industry. Annals of Operations Research, 176, 311–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballon, P., de Munck, S., Poel, M., & Van de Pas, P. (2001). The Dutch telecommunications market. A strategic and empirical analysis. Technical Report TNO Report STB-01-03. TNO Strategy, Technology & Policy, Delft, The Netherlands.

  • Barut, M., & Sridharan, V. (2005). Revenue management in order-driven production systems. Decision Sciences, 36, 287–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouras, C., & Sevasti, A. (2004). Sla-based qos pricing in DiffServ networks. Computer Communications, 27, 1868–1880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., & Homem-de Mello, T. (2010). Re-solving stochastic programming models for airline revenue management. Annals of Operations Research, 177, 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C.-T., & Shin, K. G. (2004). Analysis of adaptive bandwidth allocation in wireless networks with multilevel degradable quality of service. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 3, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comer, D. E. (2008). Computer networks and internets (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courcoubetis, C., Kelly, F., & Weber, R. (2000). Measurement-based usage charges in communications networks. Operations Research, 48, 535–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, J., & Burstein, F. (2007). Quality of data model for supporting mobile decision making. Decision Support Systems, 43, 1675–1683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. K., Jayaram, R., Kakani, N. K., & Sen, S. K. (2000). A call admission and control scheme for quality-of-service (QoS) provisioning in next generation wireless networks. Wireless Networks, 6, 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. K., Sen, S. K., Agrawal, P., & Basu, K. (1997). Modeling QoS degradation in multimedia wireless networks. In Personal wireless communications, 1997 IEEE international conference on (pp. 484–488). IEEE.

  • Das, S. K., Sen, S. K., Basu, K., & Lin, H. (2003). A framework for bandwidth degradation and call admission control schemes for multiclass traffic in next-generation wireless networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 21, 1790–1802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, H., Wang, Q., Leong, G. K., & Sun, S. X. (2008). The usage of opportunity cost to maximize performance in revenue management. Decision Sciences, 39, 737–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortunato, E., Marchese, M., Mongelli, M., & Raviola, A. (2004). Qos guarantee in telecommunication networks: Technologies and solutions. International Journal of Communication Systems, 17, 935–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulp, E. W., & Reeves, D. S. (2004). Bandwidth provisioning and pricing for networks with multiple classes of service. Computer Networks, 46, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., Kalyanaraman, S., & Zhang, L. (2006). Pricing of risk for loss guaranteed intra-domain internet service contracts. Computer Networks, 50, 2787–2804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., Stahl, D. O., & Whinston, A. B. (1999). The economics of network management. Communications of the ACM, 42, 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habib, A., Fahmy, S., Avasarala, S. R., Prabhakar, V., & Bhargava, B. (2003). On detecting service violations and bandwidth theft in QoS network domains. Computer Communications, 26, 861–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jukic, B., Simon, R., & Chang, W. S. (2004). Congestion based resource sharing in multi-service networks. Decision Support Systems, 37, 397–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junqi, W., Zhengbing, H., Jiuming, Y., & Jun, S. (2007). The degradation of bandwidth in qos scheme for 4g mobile networks. In Wireless communications, networking and mobile computing, 2007. WiCom 2007. International Conference on (pp. 2020–2024). IEEE.

  • Kasap, N., Aytug, H., & Erenguc, S. S. (2007). Provider selection and task allocation issues in networks with different QoS levels and all you can send pricing. Decision Support Systems, 43, 375–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koubâa, A., & Song, Y.-Q. (2005). Graceful degradation of loss-tolerant QoS using (m, k)-firm constraints in guaranteed rate networks. Computer Communications, 28, 1393–1409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, B., Hamdi, M., Iang, D., Cao, X.-R., & Hou, Y. T. (2000). QoS enabled voice support in the next generation internet: Issues, existing approaches and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 38, 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., & Whalley, J. (2002). Deconstruction of the telecommunications industry: From value chains to value networks. Telecommunications Policy, 26, 451–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L., & Atkins, D. (2013). Designing service level agreements for inventory management. Production and Operations Management, 22, 1103–1117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T., Methapatara, C., & Wynter, L. (2010). Revenue management model for on-demand it services. European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 401–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodi, A., Martello, S., & Monaci, M. (2002). Two-dimensional packing problems: A survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 141, 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maillé, P., & Tuffin, B. (2012). Competition among providers in loss networks. Annals of Operations Research, 199, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao, G. (2005). A real-time loss performance monitoring scheme. Computer Communications, 28, 150–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martello, S., & Vigo, D. (1998). Exact solution of the two-dimensional finite bin packing problem. Management Science, 44, 388–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naghshineh, M., & Acampora, A. S. (1996). QoS provisioning in micro-cellular networks supporting multiple classes of traffic. Wireless Networks, 2, 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naghshineh, M., & Willebeek-Lemair, M. (1997). End to end QoS provisioning multimedia wireless/mobile networks using an adaptive framework. IEEE Communications Magazine, 35, 72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, W., Wang, X., Zhong, Y.-G., Yu, L., Jie, C., Ran, L., et al. (2012). A fuzzy multi-objective model for capacity allocation and pricing policy of provider in data communication service with different QoS levels. International Journal of Systems Science, 43, 1054–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, W., Yu, L., Wang, S., Hua, G., Xie, G., & Zhang, J. (2009). Dynamic pricing strategy of provider with different QoS levels in web service. Journal of Networks, 4, 228–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parameswaran, M., Stallaert, J., & Whinston, A. B. (2001). A market-based allocation mechanism for the DiffServ framework. Decision Support Systems, 31, 351–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana, O., Warnier, M., Quillinan, T. B., & Brazier, F. (2008). Monitoring and reputation mechanisms for service level agreements. In Grid economics and business models (pp. 125–139). Berlin: Springer.

  • Reichl, P., Hausheer, D., & Stiller, B. (2003). The cumulus pricing model as an adaptive framework for feasible, efficient, and user-friendly tariffing of internet services. Computer Networks, 43, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuetz, H.-J., & Kolisch, R. (2013). Capacity allocation for demand of different customer–product-combinations with cancellations, no-shows, and overbooking when there is a sequential delivery of service. Annals of Operations Research, 206, 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieke, M. A., Seifert, R. W., & Thonemann, U. W. (2012). Designing service level contracts for supply chain coordination. Production and Operations Management, 21, 698–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tektaş, B., & Kasap, N. (2008). Time and volume based optimal pricing strategies for telecommunication networks. In IAMOT 2008. The British University in Dubai.

  • Turan, H. H., Kasap, N., & Tektaş Sivrikaya, B. (2010). The effects of QoS level degradation cost on provider selection and task allocation model in telecommunication networks. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 2, 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turan, H. H., Serarslan, M. N., & Kasap, N. (2014). A fuzzy stochastic model for telecommunications bandwidth brokers under probabilistic QoS measures. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38, 12–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma, S., Pankaj, R. K., & Leon-Garcia, A. (1998). Call admission and resource reservation for guaranteed quality of service (GQoS) services in internet. Computer Communications, 21, 362–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Gong, X., Deng, H., & Leong, G. K. (2011). The use of switching point and protection levels to improve revenue performance in order-driven production systems. Decision Sciences, 42, 495–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Yue, W., & Wang, S. (2006). Stochastic model and analysis for capacity optimization in communication networks. Computer Communications, 29, 2377–2385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Y., Chen, C. P., & Wang, B. (2002). Bandwidth degradation QoS provisioning for adaptive multimedia in wireless/mobile networks. Computer Communications, 25, 1153–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuang, M. C., & Haung, Y. R. (1998). Bandwidth assignment paradigms for broadband integrated voice/data networks. Computer Communications, 21, 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is partially supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) Career Development Program under Grant No. 106 K 263, and the NPRP award (NPRP 7-308-2-128) from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of The Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the author(s).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dursun Delen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kasap, N., Turan, H.H., Savran, H. et al. Provider selection and task allocation in telecommunications with QoS degradation policy. Ann Oper Res 263, 311–337 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2213-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2213-5

Keywords

Navigation