Abstract
Let R be a complete local Gorenstein ring of dimension one, with maximal ideal \(\mathfrak {m}\). We show that if M is a Cohen-Macaulay R-module which begins an AR-sequence, then this sequence is produced by a particular endomorphism of \(\mathfrak {m}\) corresponding to a minimal prime ideal of R. We apply this result to determining the shape of some components of stable Auslander-Reiten quivers, which in the considered examples are shown to be tubes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ariki, S., Kase, R., Miyamoto, K.: On components of stable Auslander-Reiten quivers that contain Heller lattices: the case of truncated polynomial rings. Nagoya Mathematical Journal pp. 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/nmj.2016.53 (2016)
Auslander, M.: Rational singularities and almost split sequences. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc 293(2), 511–531 (1986)
Auslander, M., Reiten, I.: Cohen-Macaulay modules for graded Cohen-Macaulay rings and their completions. Commutative algebra (1987)
Auslander, M., Reiten, I., Smalø, S.O.: Representation theory of Artin algebras, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 36. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997). Corrected reprint of the 1995 original
Benson, D.J.: Representations and Cohomology, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623615
Bruns, W., Herzog, J.: Cohen-Macaulay rings. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 39. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)
Decker, W., Greuel, G.M., Pfister, G., Schönemann, H.: Singular 4-1-0 — A computer algebra system for polynomial computations. http://www.singular.uni-kl.de(2016)
Eisenbud, D.: Commutative algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 150. Springer-Verlag, New York (1995). With a view toward algebraic geometry
Happel, D., Preiser, U., Ringel, C.M.: Vinberg’s characterization of Dynkin diagrams using subadditive functions with application to DTr-periodic modules, pp 280–294. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0088469
Hattori, A.: Rank element of a projective module. Nagoya. Math. J. 25, 113–120 (1965). URL https://projecteuclid.org:443/euclid.nmj/1118801428
Huneke, C., Swanson, I.: Integral closure of ideals, rings, and modules. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 336. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)
Leuschke, G.J., Wiegand, R.: Cohen-Macaulay representations. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 181. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI. http://www.leuschke.org/research/MCMBook. Xviii+ 367 pages. ISBN: 978-0-8218-7581-0 (2012)
Mac Lane, S.: Homology. Die Grundlehren der mathematicschen Wissenschaften, Bd 114. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York (1963)
Matsumura, H.: Commutative algebra. W.A. Benjamin, New York (1970)
Matsumura, H.: Commutative ring theory, Cambridge studies in advanced mathematics, vol. 8, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989). Translated from the Japanese by M. Reid
Miyata, T.: Note on direct summands of modules. J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 7, 65–69 (1967)
Yoshino, Y.: Cohen-Macaulay modules over Cohen-Macaulay rings. London mathematical society lecture note series, vol. 146. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank my advisor, Graham Leuschke.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Presented by: Jon F. Carlson
This work will appear as part of the author’s dissertation at Syracuse University. The author gratefully acknowledges support from U.S. National Science Foundation grant DMS 1502107.
Appendix
Appendix
In this Appendix we record some lemmas for reduced connected graded rings of dimension one. The following theorem is well-known.
Theorem A.1
LetB be one-dimensional, noetherian, local domain with integral closureB¯ and\(\mathfrak {m}\)B-adiccompletion \(\hat {B}\). Then the following are equivalent.
- (1)
\(\hat {B}\)isa domain. (“B is analytically irreducible.”)
- (2)
\(\overline {B}\)islocal and \(\hat {B}\)isreduced. (“B is unibranched and analytically unramified.”)
- (3)
\(\overline {B}\)islocal and finitely generated as aB-module.
Notation A.2
If R is a connected graded ring, let \(\hat {R}\) denote the completion of R with respect to its graded maximal ideal, \(\mathfrak {m}\).
Lemma A.3
Let R be a reduced connected graded ring. Then:
-
1.
The integral closure ofR inR[nonzerodivisors]−1coincideswith the integral closure ofR inQ = R[graded nonzerodivisors]−1, our definition of\(\overline {R}\). Moreover, \(\overline {R} =\bigoplus _{i \ge 0} \overline {R}_{i}\)isanℕ-gradedsubring ofQ.
-
2.
We have \(\hat {R}= {\prod }_{i \ge 0} R_{i}\).
-
3.
The completion,R̂, is also reduced. IfR is a domain, thenR̂ isa domain.
-
4.
The integral closure,\(\overline {R}\), is finitely generated as anR-module.
-
5.
The integral closure of the completion, \(\overline {\hat {R}}\), is finitely generated as anR̂-module.
Proof
Statement (1) is [11, Corollary 2.3.6]. Statement (2) can be checked by noting that \(\{\mathfrak {m}^{i}\}_{i}\) is cofinal with \(\{\bigoplus _{j \ge i} R_{j}\}_{i}\), and checking that the completion of R with respect to the latter filtration is isomorphic to \( {\prod }_{i \ge 0} R_{i}\). From (2) we see that \(\hat {R}\) is reduced, resp. a domain, if R is such. As R is a finitely generated algebra over the field R0, (4) is a consequence of [14, Theorem 72]. The last assertion is a consequence of Theorem A.1 (alternatively, it follows from (4)). □
Lemma A.4
LetD be a connected graded domain of dimension one, andlet \(\mathfrak {q}=\bigoplus _{i \ge 1} D_{i}\), and \(\mathfrak {n}=\bigoplus _{i \ge 1} \overline {D}_{i}\). Then
- (a)
\({\overline {D}}_{0}\)isa field, and
- (b)
\({\prod }_{i \ge 0} {\overline {D}}_{i} =\hat {\overline {D}}^{\mathfrak {n}}=\hat {\overline {D}}^{\mathfrak {q}}=\overline {\hat {D}} \).
Proof
The notation \({\overline {D}}_{i}\) means \(({\overline {D}})_{i}\), and makes sense due to Lemma A.3, as does \(\overline {\hat {D}}\). Since \({\overline {D}}\) is an ℕ-graded domain, \(\mathfrak {n}\) is a prime ideal, and is thus maximal since \(\dim {\overline {D}}=\dim D = 1\). So \({\overline {D}}_{0}\) is a field. Now \({\prod }_{i \ge 0} {\overline {D}}_{i}=\hat {\overline {D}}^{\mathfrak {n}}\) by Lemma A.3. Note that \(X_{\mathfrak {n}} \neq 0\) for all graded \({\overline {D}}\)-modules X≠ 0. Now \({\overline {D}}_{\mathfrak {n}}/(\mathfrak {q} {\overline {D}}_{\mathfrak {n}})\) is an artinian local ring, so there exists i ≥ 1 such that \( (({\mathfrak {n}} ^{i} +\mathfrak {q}{\overline {D}})/\mathfrak {q}{\overline {D}} )_{\mathfrak {n}} = 0\), hence \( ({\mathfrak {n}} ^{i} +\mathfrak {q} {\overline {D}})/\mathfrak {q} {\overline {D}} = 0\). Thus \(\{{\mathfrak {n}} ^{i}\}_{i}\) and \(\{\mathfrak {q}^{i} {\overline {D}}\}_{i}\) are cofinal, so \(\hat {\overline {D}}^{\mathfrak {n}}=\hat {\overline {D}}^{\mathfrak {q}}\). Lastly we show \(\hat {\overline {D}}^{\mathfrak {q}}=\overline {\hat {D}}\). Note that \(\overline {D} \hookrightarrow \overline {\hat {D}}\), and since \(\overline {\hat {D}}\) is complete by Lemma A.3 Rbar and Rhat are gdd, we have \( \overline {\hat {D}} \supseteq \hat {\overline {D}}^{q} \supseteq \hat {D} \). It remains to observe that \(\hat {\overline {D}}^{q} \) is normal. But any I-adic completion of an excellent, normal ring, such as \({\overline {D}}\), is normal ([14, Theorem 79]). □
Lemma A.5
LetD be a connected graded domain of dimension one , andlet \(l= \min \{ i > 0 | \overline {D}_{i} \neq 0 \}\). Lett be any nonzero element of \({\overline {D}}_{l}\). Then \({\overline {D}}=\bigoplus _{i\ge 0} {\overline {D}}_{0} t^{i}\)isthe polynomial ring over the field \({\overline {D}}_{0}\)inthe variable t; and \(\hat {\overline {D}}={\prod }_{i\ge 0} {\overline {D}}_{i} t^{i}\)isthe power series ring.
Proof
By the previous lemmas, \({\overline {D}}\) is connected graded, so we may assume \(D={\overline {D}}\) to improve notation. Then the previous lemma also shows that \(\hat {D}={\prod }_{i \ge 0} D_{i}\) is a normal domain. Thus it is a DVR; let \(\pi \in \hat {D}\) be a uniformizing parameter. So \(\pi \hat {D}={\prod }_{i \ge 1} D_{i}\). Then t = uπi for some unit \(u \in {\prod }_{i\ge 0} D_{i}\), and it follows that i = 1, hence t is a uniformizing parameter for \(\hat {D}\). It follows that Di = 0 for i∉ℕl, and Di = D0ti/l for i ∈ℕl. The lemma follows. □
Remark A.6
If D0 is algebraically closed, Lemmas A.4 and A.5 show that D has the form \(k[t^{i_{1}},...,t^{i_{n}}]\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roy, R. Auslander-Reiten Sequences for Gorenstein Rings of Dimension One. Algebr Represent Theor 22, 909–935 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10468-018-9805-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10468-018-9805-5