Skip to main content
Log in

Auslander-Reiten Sequences for Gorenstein Rings of Dimension One

  • Published:
Algebras and Representation Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let R be a complete local Gorenstein ring of dimension one, with maximal ideal \(\mathfrak {m}\). We show that if M is a Cohen-Macaulay R-module which begins an AR-sequence, then this sequence is produced by a particular endomorphism of \(\mathfrak {m}\) corresponding to a minimal prime ideal of R. We apply this result to determining the shape of some components of stable Auslander-Reiten quivers, which in the considered examples are shown to be tubes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ariki, S., Kase, R., Miyamoto, K.: On components of stable Auslander-Reiten quivers that contain Heller lattices: the case of truncated polynomial rings. Nagoya Mathematical Journal pp. 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/nmj.2016.53 (2016)

  2. Auslander, M.: Rational singularities and almost split sequences. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc 293(2), 511–531 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Auslander, M., Reiten, I.: Cohen-Macaulay modules for graded Cohen-Macaulay rings and their completions. Commutative algebra (1987)

  4. Auslander, M., Reiten, I., Smalø, S.O.: Representation theory of Artin algebras, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 36. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997). Corrected reprint of the 1995 original

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benson, D.J.: Representations and Cohomology, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623615

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruns, W., Herzog, J.: Cohen-Macaulay rings. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 39. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Decker, W., Greuel, G.M., Pfister, G., Schönemann, H.: Singular 4-1-0 — A computer algebra system for polynomial computations. http://www.singular.uni-kl.de(2016)

  8. Eisenbud, D.: Commutative algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 150. Springer-Verlag, New York (1995). With a view toward algebraic geometry

    Google Scholar 

  9. Happel, D., Preiser, U., Ringel, C.M.: Vinberg’s characterization of Dynkin diagrams using subadditive functions with application to DTr-periodic modules, pp 280–294. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0088469

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hattori, A.: Rank element of a projective module. Nagoya. Math. J. 25, 113–120 (1965). URL https://projecteuclid.org:443/euclid.nmj/1118801428

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Huneke, C., Swanson, I.: Integral closure of ideals, rings, and modules. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 336. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leuschke, G.J., Wiegand, R.: Cohen-Macaulay representations. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 181. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI. http://www.leuschke.org/research/MCMBook. Xviii+ 367 pages. ISBN: 978-0-8218-7581-0 (2012)

  13. Mac Lane, S.: Homology. Die Grundlehren der mathematicschen Wissenschaften, Bd 114. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Matsumura, H.: Commutative algebra. W.A. Benjamin, New York (1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsumura, H.: Commutative ring theory, Cambridge studies in advanced mathematics, vol. 8, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989). Translated from the Japanese by M. Reid

  16. Miyata, T.: Note on direct summands of modules. J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 7, 65–69 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoshino, Y.: Cohen-Macaulay modules over Cohen-Macaulay rings. London mathematical society lecture note series, vol. 146. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank my advisor, Graham Leuschke.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Roy.

Additional information

Presented by: Jon F. Carlson

This work will appear as part of the author’s dissertation at Syracuse University. The author gratefully acknowledges support from U.S. National Science Foundation grant DMS 1502107.

Appendix

Appendix

In this Appendix we record some lemmas for reduced connected graded rings of dimension one. The following theorem is well-known.

Theorem A.1

LetB be one-dimensional, noetherian, local domain with integral closureB¯ and\(\mathfrak {m}\)B-adiccompletion \(\hat {B}\). Then the following are equivalent.

  1. (1)

    \(\hat {B}\)isa domain. (“B is analytically irreducible.”)

  2. (2)

    \(\overline {B}\)islocal and \(\hat {B}\)isreduced. (“B is unibranched and analytically unramified.”)

  3. (3)

    \(\overline {B}\)islocal and finitely generated as aB-module.

Notation A.2

If R is a connected graded ring, let \(\hat {R}\) denote the completion of R with respect to its graded maximal ideal, \(\mathfrak {m}\).

Lemma A.3

Let R be a reduced connected graded ring. Then:

  1. 1.

    The integral closure ofR inR[nonzerodivisors]−1coincideswith the integral closure ofR inQ = R[graded nonzerodivisors]−1, our definition of\(\overline {R}\). Moreover, \(\overline {R} =\bigoplus _{i \ge 0} \overline {R}_{i}\)isan-gradedsubring ofQ.

  2. 2.

    We have \(\hat {R}= {\prod }_{i \ge 0} R_{i}\).

  3. 3.

    The completion,R̂, is also reduced. IfR is a domain, thenR̂ isa domain.

  4. 4.

    The integral closure,\(\overline {R}\), is finitely generated as anR-module.

  5. 5.

    The integral closure of the completion, \(\overline {\hat {R}}\), is finitely generated as anR̂-module.

Proof

Statement (1) is [11, Corollary 2.3.6]. Statement (2) can be checked by noting that \(\{\mathfrak {m}^{i}\}_{i}\) is cofinal with \(\{\bigoplus _{j \ge i} R_{j}\}_{i}\), and checking that the completion of R with respect to the latter filtration is isomorphic to \( {\prod }_{i \ge 0} R_{i}\). From (2) we see that \(\hat {R}\) is reduced, resp. a domain, if R is such. As R is a finitely generated algebra over the field R0, (4) is a consequence of [14, Theorem 72]. The last assertion is a consequence of Theorem A.1 (alternatively, it follows from (4)). □

Lemma A.4

LetD be a connected graded domain of dimension one, andlet \(\mathfrak {q}=\bigoplus _{i \ge 1} D_{i}\), and \(\mathfrak {n}=\bigoplus _{i \ge 1} \overline {D}_{i}\). Then

  1. (a)

    \({\overline {D}}_{0}\)isa field, and

  2. (b)

    \({\prod }_{i \ge 0} {\overline {D}}_{i} =\hat {\overline {D}}^{\mathfrak {n}}=\hat {\overline {D}}^{\mathfrak {q}}=\overline {\hat {D}} \).

Proof

The notation \({\overline {D}}_{i}\) means \(({\overline {D}})_{i}\), and makes sense due to Lemma A.3, as does \(\overline {\hat {D}}\). Since \({\overline {D}}\) is an -graded domain, \(\mathfrak {n}\) is a prime ideal, and is thus maximal since \(\dim {\overline {D}}=\dim D = 1\). So \({\overline {D}}_{0}\) is a field. Now \({\prod }_{i \ge 0} {\overline {D}}_{i}=\hat {\overline {D}}^{\mathfrak {n}}\) by Lemma A.3. Note that \(X_{\mathfrak {n}} \neq 0\) for all graded \({\overline {D}}\)-modules X≠ 0. Now \({\overline {D}}_{\mathfrak {n}}/(\mathfrak {q} {\overline {D}}_{\mathfrak {n}})\) is an artinian local ring, so there exists i ≥ 1 such that \( (({\mathfrak {n}} ^{i} +\mathfrak {q}{\overline {D}})/\mathfrak {q}{\overline {D}} )_{\mathfrak {n}} = 0\), hence \( ({\mathfrak {n}} ^{i} +\mathfrak {q} {\overline {D}})/\mathfrak {q} {\overline {D}} = 0\). Thus \(\{{\mathfrak {n}} ^{i}\}_{i}\) and \(\{\mathfrak {q}^{i} {\overline {D}}\}_{i}\) are cofinal, so \(\hat {\overline {D}}^{\mathfrak {n}}=\hat {\overline {D}}^{\mathfrak {q}}\). Lastly we show \(\hat {\overline {D}}^{\mathfrak {q}}=\overline {\hat {D}}\). Note that \(\overline {D} \hookrightarrow \overline {\hat {D}}\), and since \(\overline {\hat {D}}\) is complete by Lemma A.3 Rbar and Rhat are gdd, we have \( \overline {\hat {D}} \supseteq \hat {\overline {D}}^{q} \supseteq \hat {D} \). It remains to observe that \(\hat {\overline {D}}^{q} \) is normal. But any I-adic completion of an excellent, normal ring, such as \({\overline {D}}\), is normal ([14, Theorem 79]). □

Lemma A.5

LetD be a connected graded domain of dimension one , andlet \(l= \min \{ i > 0 | \overline {D}_{i} \neq 0 \}\). Lett be any nonzero element of \({\overline {D}}_{l}\). Then \({\overline {D}}=\bigoplus _{i\ge 0} {\overline {D}}_{0} t^{i}\)isthe polynomial ring over the field \({\overline {D}}_{0}\)inthe variable t; and \(\hat {\overline {D}}={\prod }_{i\ge 0} {\overline {D}}_{i} t^{i}\)isthe power series ring.

Proof

By the previous lemmas, \({\overline {D}}\) is connected graded, so we may assume \(D={\overline {D}}\) to improve notation. Then the previous lemma also shows that \(\hat {D}={\prod }_{i \ge 0} D_{i}\) is a normal domain. Thus it is a DVR; let \(\pi \in \hat {D}\) be a uniformizing parameter. So \(\pi \hat {D}={\prod }_{i \ge 1} D_{i}\). Then t = uπi for some unit \(u \in {\prod }_{i\ge 0} D_{i}\), and it follows that i = 1, hence t is a uniformizing parameter for \(\hat {D}\). It follows that Di = 0 for il, and Di = D0ti/l for il. The lemma follows. □

Remark A.6

If D0 is algebraically closed, Lemmas A.4 and A.5 show that D has the form \(k[t^{i_{1}},...,t^{i_{n}}]\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roy, R. Auslander-Reiten Sequences for Gorenstein Rings of Dimension One. Algebr Represent Theor 22, 909–935 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10468-018-9805-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10468-018-9805-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation