Summary
Background
Currently, the most difficult-to-treat tibial plateau fractures are complex, comminuted fractures, which result from high-energy trauma. The anatomical reconstruction of the articular surface and the preservation of the soft tissue envelope are required for a good functional result. The aim of this study is to perform a biomechanical evaluation of three constructs used in the treatment of bicondylar fractures: the L‑shaped plate, the LCP locking plate, and the hybrid external fixator.
Methods
We used 30 experimental models divided into three study groups. There were ten models for each type of implant.
Results
The best biomechanical behavior was found with the LCP locking plate, which showed minimal deformation upon cyclic loading, followed by the hybrid external fixator.
Conclusions
The LCP plate is the optimal implant for the stabilization of Schatzker type V tibial plateau fractures, with low rates of degradation for the implant and the bone–implant assembly.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schatzker J, McBroom R, Bruce D. The tibial plateau fracture: the Toronto experience, 1968–1975. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;138:94–104.
Schatzker J. Compression in the surgical treatment of fractures of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974;105:220–39.
Mueller KL, Karunakar MA, Frankenburg EP, Scott DS. Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures: a biomechanical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;412:189–95.
Egol KA, Su E, Tejwani NC, Sims SH, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ. Treatment of complex tibial plateau fractures using the less invasive stabilization system plate: clinical experience and a laboratory comparison with double plating. J Trauma. 2004;57(2):340–6.
Gosling T, Schandelmaier P, Marti A, Hufner T, Partenheimer A, Krettek C. Less invasive stabilization of complex tibial plateau fractures: a biomechanical evaluation of a unilateral locked screw plate and double plating. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(8):546–51.
Higgins TF, Klatt J, Bachus KN. Biomechanical analysis of bicondylar tibial plateau fixation: how does lateral locking plate fixation compare to dual plate fixation? J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(5):301–6.
Golyakhovsky V, Ferrara PL. Operative manual of Ilizarov techniques. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993, pp 171–90.
Ali AM, Saleh M, Bolongaro S, Yang L. Experimental model of tibial plateau fracture for biomechanical testing. J Biomech. 2006;39:1355–60.
Horwitz DS, Bachus KN, Craig MA, Peters CL. A biomechanical analysis of internal fixation of complex tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13(8):545–9.
Lindeque B, Baldini T. A Biomechanical comparision of threedifferent lateral tibia locking plates. Orthopedics. 2010;33(1):18–21.
Weiner LS, Kelley M, Yang E, et al. The use of combination internal fixation and hybrid external fixation in severe proximal tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9(3):244–56.
Dendrinos GK, Kontos S, Katsenis D. Treatment of high-energy tibial plateau fractures by the Ilizarov circular fixator. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:710–71.
Moore TM, Patzakis MJ, Harvey JP. Tibial plateau fractures: definition, demographics, treatment rationale, and long-term results of closed traction management or operative reduction. J Orthop Trauma. 1987;1(2):97–119.
Yang EC, Weiner L, Strauss E, Sedlin E, Kelley M, Raphael J. Metaphyseal dissociation fractures of the proximal tibia. An analysis of treatment and complications. Am J Orthop. 1995;24(9):695–704.
Young MJ, Barrack RL. Complications of internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures. Orthop Rev. 1994;23(2):149–54.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Prof Mirela Toth-Tascau from University Politehnica of Timisoara, Department of Mechanics and Material Strength—were the biomechanical testings and measurements were performed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
C. Faur and B. Niculescu declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Faur, C.I., Niculescu, B. Comparative biomechanical analysis of three implants used in bicondylar tibial fractures. Wien Med Wochenschr 168, 254–260 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-017-0551-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-017-0551-9