Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative biomechanical analysis of three implants used in bicondylar tibial fractures

  • original article
  • Published:
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Currently, the most difficult-to-treat tibial plateau fractures are complex, comminuted fractures, which result from high-energy trauma. The anatomical reconstruction of the articular surface and the preservation of the soft tissue envelope are required for a good functional result. The aim of this study is to perform a biomechanical evaluation of three constructs used in the treatment of bicondylar fractures: the L‑shaped plate, the LCP locking plate, and the hybrid external fixator.

Methods

We used 30 experimental models divided into three study groups. There were ten models for each type of implant.

Results

The best biomechanical behavior was found with the LCP locking plate, which showed minimal deformation upon cyclic loading, followed by the hybrid external fixator.

Conclusions

The LCP plate is the optimal implant for the stabilization of Schatzker type V tibial plateau fractures, with low rates of degradation for the implant and the bone–implant assembly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schatzker J, McBroom R, Bruce D. The tibial plateau fracture: the Toronto experience, 1968–1975. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;138:94–104.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schatzker J. Compression in the surgical treatment of fractures of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974;105:220–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mueller KL, Karunakar MA, Frankenburg EP, Scott DS. Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures: a biomechanical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;412:189–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Egol KA, Su E, Tejwani NC, Sims SH, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ. Treatment of complex tibial plateau fractures using the less invasive stabilization system plate: clinical experience and a laboratory comparison with double plating. J Trauma. 2004;57(2):340–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gosling T, Schandelmaier P, Marti A, Hufner T, Partenheimer A, Krettek C. Less invasive stabilization of complex tibial plateau fractures: a biomechanical evaluation of a unilateral locked screw plate and double plating. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(8):546–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Higgins TF, Klatt J, Bachus KN. Biomechanical analysis of bicondylar tibial plateau fixation: how does lateral locking plate fixation compare to dual plate fixation? J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(5):301–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Golyakhovsky V, Ferrara PL. Operative manual of Ilizarov techniques. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993, pp 171–90.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ali AM, Saleh M, Bolongaro S, Yang L. Experimental model of tibial plateau fracture for biomechanical testing. J Biomech. 2006;39:1355–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Horwitz DS, Bachus KN, Craig MA, Peters CL. A biomechanical analysis of internal fixation of complex tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13(8):545–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lindeque B, Baldini T. A Biomechanical comparision of threedifferent lateral tibia locking plates. Orthopedics. 2010;33(1):18–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weiner LS, Kelley M, Yang E, et al. The use of combination internal fixation and hybrid external fixation in severe proximal tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9(3):244–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dendrinos GK, Kontos S, Katsenis D. Treatment of high-energy tibial plateau fractures by the Ilizarov circular fixator. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:710–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore TM, Patzakis MJ, Harvey JP. Tibial plateau fractures: definition, demographics, treatment rationale, and long-term results of closed traction management or operative reduction. J Orthop Trauma. 1987;1(2):97–119.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang EC, Weiner L, Strauss E, Sedlin E, Kelley M, Raphael J. Metaphyseal dissociation fractures of the proximal tibia. An analysis of treatment and complications. Am J Orthop. 1995;24(9):695–704.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Young MJ, Barrack RL. Complications of internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures. Orthop Rev. 1994;23(2):149–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof Mirela Toth-Tascau from University Politehnica of Timisoara, Department of Mechanics and Material Strength—were the biomechanical testings and measurements were performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cosmin Ioan Faur.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

C. Faur and B. Niculescu declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faur, C.I., Niculescu, B. Comparative biomechanical analysis of three implants used in bicondylar tibial fractures. Wien Med Wochenschr 168, 254–260 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-017-0551-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-017-0551-9

Keywords

Navigation