Skip to main content
Log in

Krankheitsspezifische Lebensqualität bei Patienten mit Beinulzera

Eine Übersicht zu Messinstrumenten und Ergebnissen

Disease-specific quality of life in patients with leg ulcers

An overview of measurement instruments and results

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Gefässchirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die Erfassung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität ist als relevanter Gesundheitsindikator in der Medizin, so auch in der Dermatologie, akzeptiert und hat dort eine große Bedeutung erzielt. Chronische Wunden mit entsprechenden körperlichen und psychischen Auswirkungen sind mit erheblichen Einschränkungen der physischen, emotionalen und sozialen Lebensqualität Betroffener verbunden.

Ziel der Arbeit

Der vorliegende Artikel führt in das Konstrukt der Lebensqualität und ihrer Messung ein. Es werden krankheitsspezifische deutschsprachige Messinstrumente für chronische Beinwunden vorgestellt sowie bisherige Ergebnisse zur krankheitsspezifischen Lebensqualität von Patienten mit chronischen Beinwunden dargestellt.

Material und Methoden

Es wurde eine Literaturrecherche zu krankheitsspezifischer Lebensqualität bei Ulcera crurum und entsprechenden Messinstrumenten in Datenbanken wie MEDLINE und EMBASE durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse

Für den deutschsprachigen Raum liegen verschiedene psychometrisch geprüfte Instrumente zur Erfassung der krankheitsspezifischen Lebensqualität bei Menschen mit chronischen Wunden vor. Häufig eingesetzte Instrumente sind der „Freiburg Life Quality Assessment Wunden“, der „Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule“, der „Würzburger Wundscore“ sowie der „Wound-QoL“. Anhand dieser Instrumente wurden erhebliche Einschränkungen der Lebensqualität bei Ulcera crurum belegt.

Diskussion

Die Lebensqualität bei Patienten mit chronischen Wunden sollte systematisch erfasst werden, um wichtige Einblicke in die Bedürfnisse der Betroffenen zu gewinnen und die Behandlung optimieren zu können.

Abstract

Background

The assessment of health-related quality of life as a relevant health indicator is well accepted in medicine, including dermatology and has achieved a great importance. Chronic wounds with corresponding physical and psychological effects are associated with a considerable reduction in the physical, emotional and social quality of life.

Objectives

This article aims to provide an introduction to the construct of health-related quality of life and its measurement. Disease-specific instruments for chronic leg wounds in Germany are presented and current results regarding the quality of life in patients with chronic leg wounds are summarized.

Material and methods

A literature search was conducted with respect to health-related quality of life in patients with chronic leg wounds in databases, such as MEDLINE and EMBASE.

Results

Different psychometrically tested health-related quality of life instruments are available for use in Germany. Often used instruments are the Freiburg life quality assessment wound module, the Cardiff wound impact schedule, the Würzburg wound score and the wound-QoL. Using these instruments, substantial impairment of the quality of life in patients with ulcus cruris were demonstrated.

Conclusion

A systematic assessment of the quality of life in patients with chronic wounds is necessary to provide important insights into patient needs and to be able to optimize treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Acquadro C, Price P, Wollina U (2005) Linguistic validation of the cardiff wound impact schedule into french, German and US english. J Wound Care 14(1):14–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Augustin M, Amon U, Braathen L, Bullinger M, Gieler U, Klein GF, Schultz-Amlung W (2004) Erfassung von Lebensqualität in der Dermatologie. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2:802–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Augustin M, Wenninger K, Amon U, Schroth MJ, Küster W, Chren M, Kupfer J, Gieler U (2004) German adaptation of the Skindex-29 questionnaire on quality of life in dermatology: validation and clinical results. Dermatology 209(1):14–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Augustin M, Radtke MA, Zschocke I, Blome C, Behechtnejad J, Schäfer I, Reusch M, Mielke V, Rustenbach SJ (2009) The patient benefit index: a novel approach in patient-defined outcomes measurement for skin diseases. Arch Dermatol Res 301(8):561–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Augustin M, Herberger K, Rustenbach SJ, Schäfer I, Zschocke I, Blome C (2010) Quality of life evaluation in wounds: validation of the Freiburg Life Quality Assessment-wound module, a disease-specific instrument. Int Wound J 7(6):493–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Augustin M, Blome C, Goepel L, Protz K, Baade K, Heyer K, Wild T, Herberger K (2015) Patient-reported outcomes as diagnostic tools and clues in chronic wounds: considerations for practice. Wound Med 8:6–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Basra MKA, Fenech R, Gatt RM, Salek MS, Finlay AY (2008) The dermatology life quality index 1994–2007: a comprehensive review of validation data and clinical results. Br J Dermatol 159(5):997–1035

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blome C, Baade K, Debus SE, Price P, Augustin M (2014) The “Wound-QoL”: a short questionnaire measuring quality of life in patients with chronic wounds based on three established disease-specific instruments. Wound Repair Regen 22(4):504–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bullinger M (2002) Assessing health related quality of life in medicine. An overview over concepts, methods and applications in international research. Restor Neurol Neurosci 20(3–4):93–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bullinger M (2016) Zur Messbarkeit von Lebensqualität. In: Kovacs L, Kipke R, Lutz R (Hrsg) Lebensqualität in der Medizin. Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, S 175–188

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Bullinger M, Quitmann J (2014) Quality of life as patient-reported outcomes: principles of assessment. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 16(2):137–145

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chren M‑M, Lasek RJ, Quinn LM, Mostow EN, Zyzanski SJ (1996) Skindex, a quality-of-life measure for patients with skin disease: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Invest Dermatol 107(5):707–713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Deutsches Netzwerk für Qualitätsentwicklung in der Pflege (2015) Expertenstandard Pflege von Menschen mit chronischen Wunden. 1. Aktualisierung. https://www.dnqp.de/fileadmin/HSOS/Homepages/DNQP/Dateien/Expertenstandards/Pflege_von_Menschen_mit_chronischen_Wunden/ChronWu_Akt_Auszug.pdf. Zugegriffen: 14. Aug 2016

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dissemond J, Korber A, Grabbe S (2006) Differentialdiagnosen des Ulcus cruris. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 4(8):627–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. EuroQoL Group (1990) EuroQol – a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy (New York) 16(3):199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Faria E, Blanes L, Hochmann B, Filbo M, Ferreira L (2011) Health-related quality of life, self-esteem and functional status of patients with leg ulcers. Wounds 23:4–10

    Google Scholar 

  17. Finlay AY, Khan GK (1994) Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)-a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol 19(3):210–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Franks PJ, Moffatt CJ (2006) Do clinical and social factors predict quality of life in leg ulceration? Int J Low Extrem Wounds 5(4):236–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de la González Torre H, Quintana-Lorenzo ML, Perdomo-Pérez E, Verdú J (2016) Correlation between health-related quality of life and venous leg ulcer’s severity and characteristics: a cross-sectional study. Int Wound J. doi:10.1111/iwj.12610

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gottrup F, Apelqvist J, Price P, Outcome Group (2010) Outcomes in controlled and comparative studies on non-healing wounds: recommendations to improve the quality of evidence in wound management. J Wound Care 19(6):237–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Herberger K, Rustenbach SJ, Haartje O, Blome C, Franzke N, Schäfer I, Radtke M, Augustin M (2011) Quality of life and satisfaction of patients with leg ulcers – results of a community-based study. Vasa 40(2):131–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Karimi M, Brazier J (2016) Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: what is the difference? Pharmacoeconomics 34(7):645–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kouris A, Armyra K, Christodoulou C, Sgontzou T, Karypidis D, Kontochristopoulos G, Liordou F, Zakopoulou N, Zouridaki E (2016) Quality of life psychosocial characteristics in Greek patients with leg ulcers: a case control study. Int Wound J 13(5):744–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kouris A, Christodoulou C, Efstathiou V, Tsatovidou R, Torlidi-Kordera E, Zouridaki E, Kontochristophoulos G (2016) Comparative characteristics of the phenomenological space of professional and human life projects. Eur J Psychol Stud. doi:10.13187/ejps.2016.7.4

    Google Scholar 

  25. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, Scott JA, Rock EP, Dawisha S, O’Neill R, Kennedy DL (2007) Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health 10(Suppl 2):S125–S137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, Leidy NK, Martin ML, Molsen E, Ring L (2011) Content validity-establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 2‑assessing respondent understanding. Value Health 14(8):978–988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Reeve BB, Wyrwich KW, Wu AW, Velikova G, Terwee CB, Snyder CF, Schwartz C, Revicki DA, Moinpour CM, McLeod LD, Lyons JC, Lenderking WR, Hinds PS, Hays RD, Greenhalgh J, Gershon R, Feeny D, Fayers PM, Cella D, Brundage M, Ahmed S, Aaronson NK, Butt Z (2013) ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Qual Life Res 22(8):1889–1905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Spech E, Faller H, Franke A, Thiede A, Debus E (2003) Der Würzburger Wundscore (WWS: Ein neuer Lebensqualitätsfragebogen). Z Wundheil 8:40–42

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ware J (1996) The SF-36 health survey. In: Spilker B (Hrsg) Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, S 337–346

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Sommer MPH.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

R. Sommer und C. Blome geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sommer, R., Blome, C. Krankheitsspezifische Lebensqualität bei Patienten mit Beinulzera. Gefässchirurgie 22, 169–173 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-017-0267-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-017-0267-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation