Abstract
Purpose
The aim of surgical intervention for chronic pancreatitis (CP) is to relieve symptoms and improve quality of life. However, the precise effect of surgery on the nutritional status of CP patients, which is often impaired by exocrine and endocrine pancreatic dysfunction, has not been elucidated. We conducted this study to evaluate whether Frey’s procedure improves the nutritional status of CP patients.
Methods
The nutritional status of 35 patients who underwent Frey’s procedure for CP at our institute between April 2005 and December 2014, was assessed by the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) scoring before and 1 year after the surgery, and compared with that of seven CP patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. The occurrence of postoperative hepatic steatosis was also monitored.
Results
The nutritional status improved after Frey’s procedure, but not after pancreatoduodenectomy. The median postoperative CONUT score after Frey’s procedure was significantly lower than the preoperative score (1.0 ± 0.5 vs. 4.0 ± 2.5; p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Frey’s procedure is superior to pancreatoduodenectomy for improving the nutritional status of CP patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for chronic pancreatitis 2015 (2nd edition) (in Japanese). Tokyo: Nankodo; 2015.
Cahen DL, Gouma DJ, Nio Y, Rauws EA, Boermeester MA, Busch OR, et al. Endoscopic versus surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis. N Eng J Med. 2007;356:676–84.
Puestow CW, Gillesby WJ. Retrograde surgical drainage of the pancreas for chronic relapsing pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 1958;69:898–907.
Partington PF, Rochelle RL. Modified Puestow procedure for retrograde of the pancreatic duct. Ann Surg. 1969;152:1037–43.
Beger HG, Krautzberger W, Bittner R, Büchler M, Limmer J. Duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas in patients with severe chronic pancreatitis. Surgery. 1985;97:467–73.
Frey CF, Smith GJ. Description and rationale of a new operation for chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas. 1987;2(6):701–7.
Egawa S, Motoi F, Sakata N, Kitamura Y, Nakagawa K, Ohtsuka H, et al. Assessment of Frey procedures: Japanese experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17(6):745–51.
Amikura K, Arai K, Kobari M, Matsuno S. Surgery for chronic pancreatitis-extended pancreaticojejunostomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;44(18):1547–53.
Izbicki JR, Bloechle C, Broering DC, Knoefel WT, Kuechler T, Broelsch CE. Extended drainage versus resection in surgery for chronic pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial comparing the longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy combined with local pancreatic head excision with the pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1998;228:771–9.
Frey CF, Mayer KL. Comparison of local resection of the head of the pancreas combined with longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy (Frey procedure) and duodenum-preserving resection of the pancreatic head (Beger procedure). World J Surg. 2003;27(11):1217–30.
Strate T, Bachmann K, Busch P, Mann O, Schneider C, Bruhn JP, et al. Resection vs drainage in treatment of chronic pancreatitis: long-term results of a randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1406–11.
Izbicki JR, Bloechle C, Knoefel WT, Kuechler T, Binmoeller KF, Broelsch CE. Duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas in chronic pancreatitis. A prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg. 1995;221:350–8.
Ignacio de Ulibarri J, Gonzalez-Madrono A, de Villar NG, Gonzalez P, Gonzalez B, Mancha A, et al. CONUT: a tool for controlling nutritional status. First validation in a hospital population. Nutr Hosp. 2005;20:38–45.
Hata T, Ishida M, Motoi F, Sakata N, Yoshimatsu G, Naitoh T, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for the development of postoperative hepatic steatosis after total pancreatectomy. Pancreas. 2016;45(3):362–9.
Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, et al. Extended Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today. 2016;46:668.
Sakata N, Egawa S, Motoi F, Goto M, Matsuno S, Katayose Y, et al. How much of the pancreatic head should we resect in Frey’s procedure? Surg Today. 2009;39(2):120–7.
de la Iglesia-García D, Huang W, Szatmary P, Baston-Rey I, Gonzalez-Lopez J, Prada-Ramallal G, et al. Efficacy of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in chronic pancreatitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2016;2016:1–13. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312529.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Hideaki Sato and his co-authors have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sato, H., Ishida, M., Motoi, F. et al. Frey’s procedure for chronic pancreatitis improves the nutritional status of these patients. Surg Today 48, 80–86 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1557-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1557-z