Skip to main content
Log in

New angle measurement device to control the posterior tibial slope angle in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy has been associated with an unintentional increase in the posterior tibial slope angle. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel bone spreader angle rod to maintain the native posterior tibial slope angle in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Materials and methods

Data from 92 consecutive knees in 83 patients who underwent medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for knee osteoarthritis between March 2015 and June 2016 were analysed. The osteotomy was performed without the use of a bone spreader angle rod in the first 50 cases (control group) and with the use of the angle rod in the subsequent 42 cases (angle rod group). The wedge insertion angle, defined as the angle between a line drawn along the posterior aspect of the wedge spacer and a line tangential to the posterior aspect of the femoral condyles, and the posterior tibial slope angle were evaluated on pre- and postoperative lateral knee radiographs and postoperative computed tomography images.

Results

Wedge insertion angle showed that wedge spacers were inserted in a more direct horizontal direction in the angle rod group than in the control group (16.0 ± 8.8° and 23.0 ± 10.0°, respectively, P < 0.001). The pre- to postoperative change in posterior tibial slope angle was significantly smaller in the angle rod group (0.6 ± 1.6°) compared to that in the control group (3.2 ± 3.2°; P < 0.0001). A change of posterior tibial slope angle > 3° (outlier) was identified in 1 case (2.4%) in the angle rod group compared to 27 cases in the control group (54.0%).

Conclusions

The direct horizontal insertion of wedge spacers with the assistance of our novel bone spreader angle rod maintains the native posterior tibial slope angle better than conventional methods.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brinkman JM, Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD, Staubli AE, Wymenga AB, van Heerwaarden RJ (2008) Osteotomies around the knee: patient selection, stability of fixation and bone healing in high tibial osteotomies. J B Jt Surg Br 90:1548–1557. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B12.21198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Hewett TE (2000) High tibial osteotomy and ligament reconstruction for varus angulated anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Am J Sports Med 28:282–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brouwer RW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Koeveringe AJ, Verhaar JA (2005) Patellar height and the inclination of the tibial plateau after high tibial osteotomy. The open versus the closed-wedge technique. J B Jt Surg Br 87:1227–1232. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B9.15972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. LaPrade RF, Oro FB, Ziegler CG, Wijdicks CA, Walsh MP (2010) Patellar height and tibial slope after opening-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med 38:160–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509342701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Noyes FR, Goebel SX, West J (2005) Opening wedge tibial osteotomy: the 3-triangle method to correct axial alignment and tibial slope. Am J Sports Med 33:378–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Agneskirchner JD, Hurschler C, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Imhoff AB, Lobenhoffer P (2004) Effect of high tibial flexion osteotomy on cartilage pressure and joint kinematics: a biomechanical study in human cadaveric knees. Winner of the AGA-DonJoy Award 2004. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:575–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0728-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dugdale TW, Noyes FR, Styer D (1992) Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy. The effect of lateral tibiofemoral separation and tibiofemoral length. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274:248–264

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J, Goutallier D (1987) Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J B Jt Surg Am 69:332–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Marti CB, Gautier E, Wachtl SW, Jakob RP (2004) Accuracy of frontal and sagittal plane correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 20:366–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Giffin JR, Vogrin TM, Zantop T, Woo SL, Harner CD (2004) Effects of increasing tibial slope on the biomechanics of the knee. Am J Sports Med 32:376–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rodner CM, Adams DJ, Diaz-Doran V, Tate JP, Santangelo SA, Mazzocca AD, Arciero RA (2006) Medial opening wedge tibial osteotomy and the sagittal plane: the effect of increasing tibial slope on tibiofemoral contact pressure. Am J Sports Med 34:1431–1441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506287297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Webb JM, Salmon LJ, Leclerc E, Pinczewski LA, Roe JP (2013) Posterior tibial slope and further anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed patient. Am J Sports Med 41:2800–2804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513503288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Arun GR, Kumaraswamy V, Rajan D, Vinodh K, Singh AK, Kumar P, Chandrasekaran K, Santosh S, Kishore C (2016) Long-term follow up of single-stage anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and high tibial osteotomy and its relation with posterior tibial slope. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:505–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2385-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Christensen JJ, Krych AJ, Engasser WM, Vanhees MK, Collins MS, Dahm DL (2015) Lateral tibial posterior slope is increased in patients with early graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 43:2510–2514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515597664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dejour D, Saffarini M, Demey G, Baverel L (2015) Tibial slope correction combined with second revision ACL produces good knee stability and prevents graft rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2846–2852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3758-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zeng C, Yang T, Wu S, Gao SG, Li H, Deng ZH, Zhang Y, Lei GH (2016) Is posterior tibial slope associated with noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:830–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3382-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sonnery-Cottet B, Mogos S, Thaunat M, Archbold P, Fayard JM, Freychet B, Clechet J, Chambat P (2014) Proximal tibial anterior closing wedge osteotomy in repeat revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 42:1873–1880. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514534938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ (2007) How to avoid unintended increase of posterior slope in navigation-assisted open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Orthopedics 30:S127–S131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ogawa H, Matsumoto K, Ogawa T, Takeuchi K, Akiyama H (2016) Effect of wedge insertion angle on posterior tibial slope in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Orthop J Sports Med 4:2325967116630748. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967116630748

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ogawa H, Matsumoto K, Ogawa T, Takeuchi K, Akiyama H (2016) Preoperative varus laxity correlates with overcorrection in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2521-x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miniaci A, Ballmer FT, Ballmer PM, Jakob RP (1989) Proximal tibial osteotomy. A new fixation device. Clin Orthop Relat Res 246:250–259

    Google Scholar 

  22. Staubli AE, De Simoni C, Babst R, Lobenhoffer P (2003) TomoFix: a new LCP-concept for open wedge osteotomy of the medial proximal tibia—early results in 92 cases. Injury 34(Suppl 2):B55–B62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Staubli AE, Jacob HA (2010) Evolution of open-wedge high-tibial osteotomy: experience with a special angular stable device for internal fixation without interposition material. Int Orthop 34:167–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0902-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD (2003) Improvements in surgical technique of valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:132–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-002-0334-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Takeuchi R, Bito H, Akamatsu Y, Shiraishi T, Morishita S, Koshino T, Saito T (2010) In vitro stability of open wedge high tibial osteotomy with synthetic bone graft. Knee 17:217–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2009.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bito H, Takeuchi R, Kumagai K, Aratake M, Saito I, Hayashi R, Sasaki Y, Aota Y, Saito T (2009) A predictive factor for acquiring an ideal lower limb realignment after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:382–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0706-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fujisawa Y, Masuhara K, Shiomi S (1979) The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee. An arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints. Orthop Clin N Am 10:585–608

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetsworth K, McKie J, Bhave A (1994) Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin N Am 25:425–465

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ozel O, Yucel B, Mutlu S, Orman O, Mutlu H (2015) Changes in posterior tibial slope angle in patients undergoing open-wedge high tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3571-2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sterett WI, Miller BS, Joseph TA, Rich VJ, Bain EM (2009) Posterior tibial slope after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy of the varus degenerative knee. J Knee Surg 22:13–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Marouane H, Shirazi-Adl A, Adouni M, Hashemi J (2014) Steeper posterior tibial slope markedly increases ACL force in both active gait and passive knee joint under compression. J Biomech 47:1353–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.01.055

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marouane H, Shirazi-Adl A, Hashemi J (2015) Quantification of the role of tibial posterior slope in knee joint mechanics and ACL force in simulated gait. J Biomech 48:1899–1905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.04.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Li Y, Hong L, Feng H, Wang Q, Zhang J, Song G, Chen X, Zhuo H (2014) Posterior tibial slope influences static anterior tibial translation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a minimum 2-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 42:927–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514521770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Barrance PJ, Gade V, Allen J, Cole JL (2014) American society of biomechanics clinical biomechanics award 2013: tibiofemoral contact location changes associated with lateral heel wedging—a weight bearing MRI study. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon) 29:997–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.08.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazu Matsumoto.

Ethics declarations

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ogawa, H., Matsumoto, K. & Akiyama, H. New angle measurement device to control the posterior tibial slope angle in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138, 299–305 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2846-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2846-0

Keywords

Navigation