Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of skin friction in strong pressure-gradient equilibrium and near-equilibrium turbulent boundary layers

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conventional Clauser-chart method for determination of local skin friction in zero or weak pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer flows fails entirely in strong pressure-gradient situations. This failure occurs due to the large departure of the mean velocity profile from the universal logarithmic law upon which the conventional Clauser-chart method is based. It is possible to extend this method, even for strong pressure-gradient situations involving equilibrium or near-equilibrium turbulent boundary layers by making use of the so-called non-universal logarithmic laws. These non-universal log laws depend on the local strength of the pressure gradient and may be regarded as perturbations of the universal log law. The present paper shows that the modified Clauser-chart method, so developed, yields quite satisfactory results in terms of estimation of local skin friction in strongly accelerated or retarded equilibrium and near-equilibrium turbulent boundary layers that are not very close to relaminarization or separation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aubertine CD, Eaton JK (2005) Turbulence development in a non-equilibrium turbulent boundary layer with mild adverse pressure gradient. J Fluid Mech 532:345–365

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw P, Ferriss DH (1965) The response of a retarded equilibrium turbulent boundary layer to the sudden removal of pressure gradient. NPL Aero Report 1145

  • Brereton GJ (1989) Deduction of skin friction by Clauser technique in unsteady turbulent boundary layers. Exp Fluids 7:422–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buschmann MH, Gad-el-hak M (2003) Generalized logarithmic law and its consequences. AIAA J 41(1):40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan KA, Nagib HM, Monkewitz PA (2007) Evidence on non-universality of Kármán constant. In: Proceedings of iTi conference in Turbulence 2005, Springer, Proceedings in Physics, Progress in turbulence II, Part IV:159–163

  • Clauser FH (1954) Turbulent boundary layers in adverse pressure gradients. J Aeronaut Sci 21:91–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauser FH (1956) The turbulent boundary layer. Adv Appl Mech 4:1–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles DE (1968) The young person’s guide to the data. In: Coles DE, Hirst EA (eds) Proceedings of AFOSR-IFP-STANFORD conference on computation of turbulent boundary layers, vol II

  • Dixit SA, Ramesh ON (2008) Pressure-gradient-dependent logarithmic laws in sink flow turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 615:445–475

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Erm LP, Joubert PN (1991) Low-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 230:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernholz HH (2006) The role of skin-friction measurements in boundary layers with variable pressure gradients. In: Meier GEA, Sreenivasan KR (eds) IUTAM symposium on One Hundred Years of Boundary Layer Research, Springer

  • Fernholz HH, Warnack D (1998) The effects of a favourable pressure gradient and of the Reynolds number on an incompressible axisymmetric turbulent boundary layer Part 1. The turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 359:329–356

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fernholz HH, Janke G, Schober M, Wagner PM, Warnack D (1996) New developments and applications of skin-friction measuring techniques. Meas Sci Technol 7:1396–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring HJ, Norbury JF (1967) Some experiments on equilibrium turbulent boundary layers in favourable pressure gradients. J Fluid Mech 27:541–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MB, Marusic I, Perry AE (2001) Evolution and structure of sink flow turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 428:1–27

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall A, Koochesfahani M (2008) A method for estimating wall friction in turbulent wall-bounded flows. Exp Fluids 44:773–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan FA (1956) Experiments on Pitot-tubes in shear flow. ARC London R&M 3028

  • McKeon BJ, Li J, Jiang W, Morrison JF, Smits AJ (2004) Further observations on the mean velocity distribution in fully developed pipe flow. J Fluid Mech 501:135–147

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan CB (1938) A critical discussion of turbulent flows in channels and circular tubes. In: den Hartog JP, Peters H (eds) Proceedings of 5th international congress on applied mechanics, Wiley/Chapman & Hall, pp 386–392

  • Musker AJ (1979) Explicit expression for the smooth wall velocity distribution in a turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J 17(6):655–657

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nagib HM, Chauhan KA (2008) Variations of von Kármán coefficient in canonical flows. Phy Fluids 20: Article no. 101518

  • Nickels TB (2004) Inner scaling for wall-bounded flows subject to large pressure gradients. J Fluid Mech 521:217–239

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Österlund JM (1999) Experimental studies of zero pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer flow. PhD thesis, Department of Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology, KTH, Stockholm

  • Österlund JM, Johansson AV, Nagib HM, Hites MH (2000) A note on the overlap region in turbulent boundary layers. Phy Fluids 12: No.1 (Letters section)

  • Patel VC (1965) Calibration of the Preston tube and limitations on its use in pressure gradients. J Fluid Mech 23:185–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel VC, Head MR (1968) Reversion of turbulent to laminar flow. J Fluid Mech 34:371–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotta JC (1962) Turbulent boundary layers in incompressible flow. Prog Aeronaut Sci 2:1–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skåre PE, Krogstad PÅ (1994) A turbulent equilibrium boundary layer near separation. J Fluid Mech 272:319–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skote M, Henningson DS, Henkes RAWM (1998) Direct numerical simulation of self-similar turbulent boundary layers in adverse pressure gradients. Flow Turbul Combust 60:47–85

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Spalart PR, Leonard A (1986) Direct numerical simulation of equilibrium turbulent boundary layers. In: Durst J et al (eds) Turbulent shear flows, vol 5. Springer, Berlin

  • Spalart PR, Watmuff JH (1993) Experimental and numerical study of a turbulent boundary layer with pressure gradients. J Fluid Mech 249:337–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend AA (1976) The structure of turbulent shear flow, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, UK

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wei T, Schmidt R, McMurtry P (2005) Comment on the Clauser chart method for determining the friction velocity. Exp Fluids 38:695–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. N. Ramesh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dixit, S.A., Ramesh, O.N. Determination of skin friction in strong pressure-gradient equilibrium and near-equilibrium turbulent boundary layers. Exp Fluids 47, 1045–1058 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0698-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0698-2

Keywords

Navigation