Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability of a four-column classification for tibial plateau fractures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A four-column classification system offers a different way of evaluating tibial plateau fractures. The aim of this study is to compare the intra-observer and inter-observer reliability between four-column and classic classifications.

Methods

This is a reliability study, which included patients presenting with tibial plateau fractures between January 2013 and September 2015 in a level-1 trauma centre. Four orthopaedic surgeons blindly classified each fracture according to four different classifications: AO, Schatzker, Duparc and four-column. Kappa, intra-observer and inter-observer concordance were calculated for the reliability analysis.

Results

Forty-nine patients were included. The mean age was 39 ± 14.2 years, with no gender predominance (men: 51%; women: 49%), and 67% of the fractures included at least one of the posterior columns. The intra-observer and inter-observer concordance were calculated for each classification: four-column (84%/79%), Schatzker (60%/71%), AO (50%/59%) and Duparc (48%/58%), with a statistically significant difference among them (p = 0.001/p = 0.003). Kappa coefficient for intr-aobserver and inter-observer evaluations: Schatzker 0.48/0.39, four-column 0.61/0.34, Duparc 0.37/0.23, and AO 0.34/0.11.

Conclusions

The proposed four-column classification showed the highest intra and inter-observer agreement. When taking into account the agreement that occurs by chance, Schatzker classification showed the highest inter-observer kappa, but again the four-column had the highest intra-observer kappa value. The proposed classification is a more inclusive classification for the posteromedial and posterolateral fractures. We suggest, therefore, that it be used in addition to one of the classic classifications in order to better understand the fracture pattern, as it allows more attention to be paid to the posterior columns, it improves the surgical planning and allows the surgical approach to be chosen more accurately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gerard-Marchant P (1939) Fractures des plateaux tibiaux. Rev Chir Orthop 26:499–546

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duparc J, Ficat P (1960) Fractures Articulares de LExtremite Supérieure du Tibia. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 46:398–486

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huten D, Duparc J, Cavagna R (1990) Fractures récentes des plateaux tibiaux de l’adulte. Éditions Techniques, Enc Med Chir, Appareil locomoteur, Paris

  4. Gicquel T, Najihi N, Vendeuvre T, Teyssedou S, Gayet LE, Huten D (2013) Tibial plateau fractures: reproducibility of three classifications (Schatzker, AO, Duparc) and a revised Duparc classification. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99(7):805–816. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2013.06.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schatzker J, McBrown R, Bruce D (1979) The tibial plateau fracture: the Toronto experience 1968-1975. Clin Orthop Relat Res 138:94–104

    Google Scholar 

  6. Muller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P (1987) Classification AO des fractures. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Luo CF, Sun H, Zhang B, Zeng BF (2010) Three column fixations for complex tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 24(11):683–692. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181d436f3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Molenaars RJ, Mellema JJ, Doornberg JN, Kloen P (2015) Tibial plateau fracture characteristics: computed tomography mapping lateral, medial, and bicondylar fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(18):1512–1520. doi:10.2106/JBJS.N.00866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Postel M, Mazas F, de la Caffinière JY (1974) Posterior fracture-separation of the tibial plateaux. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 60(2 Suppl):317–323

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Martínez A, Cayón M (1999) Fracturas del platillo tibial postero medial. Rev Colomb Ortop Traumatol 13(1):37–41

    Google Scholar 

  11. Doornberg JN, Rademakers MV, van den Bekerom MP, Kerkhoffs GM, Ahn J, Steller EP, Kloen P (2011) Two-dimensional and three-dimensional computed tomography for the classification and characterisation of tibial plateau fractures. Injury 42(12):1416–1425. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang G, Zhai Q, Zhu Y, Sun H, Putnis S, Luo C (2013) The incidence of posterior tibial plateau fracture: an investigation of 525 fractures by using a CT-based classification system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(7):929–934. doi:10.1007/s00402-013-1735-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang SM, Hu SJ, Zhang YQ, Yao MW, Ma Z, Wang X, Dargel J, Eysel P (2014) A surgical protocol for bicondylar four-quadrant tibial plateau fractures. Int Orthop 38(12):2559–2564. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2487-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sohn HS, Yoon YC, Cho JW, Cho WT, Oh CW, Oh JK (2015) Incidence and fracture morphology of posterolateral fragments in lateral and bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 29(2):91–97. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu YL, Ye FG, Ji AY, Qiao GX, Liu HF (2009) Three-dimensional computed tomography imaging increases the reliability of classification systems for tibial plateau fractures. Injury 40(12):1282–1285. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2009.02.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lowe JA, Tejwani N, Yoo B, Wolinsky P (2011) Surgical techniques for complex proximal tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(16):1548–1559

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson EE, Timon S, Osuji C (2013) Surgical technique: Tscherne-Johnson extensile approach for tibial plateau fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(9):2760–2767. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-2962-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zeltser DW, Leopold SS (2013) Classifications in brief: Schatzker classification of tibial plateau fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(2):371–374. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2451-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Altman DG (1992) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tscherne H, Oestern HJ (1982) A new classification of soft-tissue damage in open and closed fractures. Unfallheilkunde 85(3):111–115

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Helen Reina for the copy editing of this manuscript, as well as Juan Esteban Restrepo, for his help with statistical calculations and analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Pablo Martínez-Cano.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

The institutional review board approved this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martínez-Rondanelli, A., Escobar-González, S.S., Henao-Alzate, A. et al. Reliability of a four-column classification for tibial plateau fractures. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 1881–1886 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3543-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3543-x

Keywords

Navigation