Skip to main content
Log in

Failure strength prediction of aluminum spot-welded joints using kernel ridge regression

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current paper presents an alternative method for failure strength prediction of spot-welded joints in aluminum, based on nonlinear regression analysis, namely, the kernel ridge regression method. Welding parameters such as electrode force, welding current, and welding time are studied in the experimental investigation to measure their effects on the nugget size and failure strength of the resistance spot welds. Coupons are manufactured and tensile tested and the results show that the welding current and time have the largest effect on the nugget size and the failure strength. The results of this study are compared to those of the least squares method and they indicate that the truncated-regularized kernel ridge regression algorithm significantly improves the coefficient of determination and reduces the mean squared error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. (1997) Recommended practices for test methods and evaluation the resistance spot welding behavior of automotive sheet steels. Standard, ANSI/AWS/SAE

  2. Afshari D (2013) Mechanical properties of resistance spot welds in lightweight applications

  3. Afshari D, Sedighi M, Barsoum Z, Peng RL (2012) An approach in prediction of failure in resistance spot welded aluminum 6061-t6 under quasi-static tensile test. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 226(6):1026–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Afshari D, Sedighi M, Karimi MR, Barsoum Z (2013) On residual stresses in resistance spot-welded aluminum alloy 6061-t6: experimental and numerical analysis. J Mater Eng Perform 22(12):3612–3619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Afshari D, Sedighi M, Karimi MR, Barsoum Z, Isikveren A (2016) Prediction of residual stresses in resistance spot weld. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 88(4):492–497

  6. Bertin L (2014) Tensile strength of automotive aluminum joints using resistance spot welding, self-piercing riveting and adhesive hybrid joining. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 5234.

  7. ASME Boiler, Pressure Vessel Committee et al (2007) Qualification standard for welding and brazing procedures, welders, brazers, and welding and brazing operators. American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  8. Chao YJ (2003) Ultimate strength and failure mechanism of resistance spot weld subjected to tensile, shear, or combined tensile/shear loads. J Eng Mater Technol 125:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De A, Gupta OP, Dorn L (1996) An experimental study of resistance spot welding in 1 mm thick sheet of low carbon steel. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 210(4):341–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Exterkate P (2011) Modelling issues in kernel ridge regression. Technical report, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper Series

  11. Fox J (2008) Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goh ATC, Goh SH (2007) Support vector machines: their use in geotechnical engineering as illustrated using seismic liquefaction data. Comput Geotech 34:410–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gunn SR (1998) Support vector machine for classification and regression. Technical report, University of Southampton

  14. Hassanifard S, Zehsaz M (2010) The effect of residual stresses on the fatigue life of 5083-o aluminum alloy spot welded joints. Fatigue 2(1):1077–1085

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis JM, Lakshmivarahan S, Dhall S (2006) Dynamic data assimilation: a least squares approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Maalouf M, Homouz D (2014) Kernel ridge regression using truncated newton method. Knowl-Based Syst 71:339–344

  17. Maalouf M, Khoury N, Laguros JG, Kumin H (2012) Support vector regression to predict the performance of stabilized aggregate bases subject to wet-dry cycles. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 36(6):675–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maalouf M, Khoury N, Trafalis TB (2008) Support vector regression to predict asphalt mix performance. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32:1989–1996

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Maalouf M, Trafalis TB, Adrianto I (2011) Kernel logistic regression using truncated newton method. Comput Manag Sci 8(4):415–428

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Manladan S, Yusof F, Ramesh S, Fadzil M (2016) A review on resistance spot welding of magnesium alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86(5):1805–1825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Manladan S, Yusof F, Ramesh S, Fadzil M, Luo Z, Ao S (2016) A review on resistance spot welding of aluminum alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1–30

  22. Marya M, Wang K, Hector LG, Gayden X (2006) Tensile-shear forces and fracture modes in single and multiple weld specimens in dual-phase steels. J Manuf Sci Eng 128(1):287– 298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG (2012) Introduction to linear regression analysis, 5 edn. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Pereira AM, Ferreira JM, Loureiro AJ, Costa DM, Bartolo PJ (2010) Effect of process parameters on the strength of resistance spot welds in 6082-t6 aluminum alloy. Mater Des 31(5):2454–2463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Phillips-Wren G (ed) (2010) Advances in intelligent decision technologies: proceedings of the second KES international symposium IDT 2010 (Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies). Spri

  26. Pouranvari M, Asgari HR, Mosavizadch SM, Marashi PH, Goodarzi M (2007) Effect of weld nugget size on overload failure mode of resistance spot welds. Sci Technol Weld Join 12(3):217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Priddy KL, Keller PE (2005) Artificial neural networks: an introduction, illustrated edition. SPIE, Bellingham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Saunders C, Gammerman A, Vovk V (1998) Ridge regression learning algorithm in dual variables. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann, pp 515–521

  29. Shawe-Taylor J, Cristianini N (2004) Kernel methods for pattern analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Smola AJ, Scholkopf B (2004) A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat Comput 14:199–222

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Sun X, Stephens EV, Khaleel MA (2008) Effects of fusion zone size and failure mode on peak load and energy absorption of advanced high strength steel spot welds under lap shear loading conditions. Eng Fail Anal 15(4):356–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sagüés Tanco J, Nielsen CV, Chergui A, Zhang W, Bay N (2015) Weld nugget formation in resistance spot welding of new lightweight sandwich material. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(5):1137–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maher Maalouf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maalouf, M., Barsoum, Z. Failure strength prediction of aluminum spot-welded joints using kernel ridge regression. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91, 3717–3725 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0070-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0070-2

Keywords

Navigation