Skip to main content
Log in

Production of fine and speciality chemicals: procedure for the estimation of LCIs

  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goal, Scope, Background

To improve the environmental performance of chemical products or services, especially via comparisons of chemical products, LCA is a suitable evaluation method. However, no procedure to obtain comprehensive LCI-data on the production of fine and speciality chemicals is available to date, and information on such production processes is scarce. Thus, a procedure was developed for the estimation of LCIs of chemical production process-steps, which relies on only a small amount of input data.

Methods

A generic input-output scheme of chemical production process-steps was set up, and equations to calculate inputs and outputs were established. For most parameters in the resulting estimation procedure, default values were derived from on-site data on chemical production processes and from heuristics. Uncertainties in the estimated default values were reflected as best-case and worst-case scenarios. The procedure was applied to a case study comparing the production of two active ingredients used for crop protection. Verification and a sensitivity analysis were carried out.

Results and Discussion

It was found that the impacts from the mass and energy flows estimated by the procedure represent a significant share of the impacts assessed in the case study. In a verification, LCI-data from existing processes yielded results within the range of the estimated best-case and worst-case scenarios. Note that verification data could not be obtained for all process steps. From the verification results, it was inferred that mass and energy flows of existing processes for the production of fine and speciality chemicals correspond more frequently to the estimated best-case than to the worst-case scenario. In the sensitivity analysis, solvent demand was found to be the most crucial parameter in the environmental performance of the chemical production processes assessed.

Conclusion

Mass and energy flows in LCIs of production processes for fine and speciality chemicals should not be neglected, even if only little information on a process is available. The estimation procedure described here helps to overcome lacking information in a transparent, consistent way.

Recommendations and Outlook

Additional verifications and a more detailed estimation of the default parameters are desirable to learn more about the accuracy of the estimation procedure. The procedure should also be applied to case studies to gain insight into the usefulness of the estimation results in different decision-making contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boustead I (1999): Eco-Profiles of Plastics and Related Intermediates. Association of Plastics Manufacturers in Europe (APME), Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stalmans M, Berenbold H, Berna JL, Cavalli L et al. (1995): European Life-Cycle Inventory for Detergent Surfactants Production. Tenside Surf Det 32, 84–109

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Frischknecht RE, Bollens U, Bosshart S, Ciot M et al (1996): ökoinventare von Energiesystemen (LCIs of Energy Systems). Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Bern, 3rd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simapro 4.0 (2001): Pré consultants B.V., Amersfoort, The Netherlands

  5. Jödicke G, Zenklusen O, Weidenhaupt A, Hungerbühler K (1999): Developing environmentally sound processes in the chemical industry: a case study on pharmaceutical intermediates. J Cleaner Prod 7, 159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kniel GE, Delmarco K, Petrie JG (1996): Life cycle assessment applied to process design: Environmental and economic analysis and optimization of a nitric acid plant. Env Prog 15, 221–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jimenez-Gonzalez C, Kim S, Overcash MR (2000): Methodology for developing gate-to-gate life cycle inventory information. Int J LCA 5, 153–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Blickenstorfer C (1999): Analyse des Energieverbrauchs eines Mehrprodukte — Batch — Betriebes: Fallbeispiel Reaktivfarbstoffproduktion. (Analysis of Energy Use in Multipurpouse — Batch — Production: Case-Study on the Production of Reactive Dyestuffs). Dissertation, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Laboratory of Technical Chemistry, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grant CD (2001): Energy Management in Chemical Industry. In: Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. New York. John Wiley & Sons, 6th ed.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (2001): John Wiley & Sons, New York, 6th ed.

  11. Bretz R, Frankhauser P (1996): Screening LCA for a large number of products. Int J LCA 1, 139–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shonnard DR, Hiew DS (2000): Comparative environmental assessments of VOC recovery and recycle design alternatives for a gaseous waste stream. Environ Sci Technol 34, 5222–5228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bretz R, Frankhauser P (1997): Life-cycle assessment of chemical production processes: A tool for ecological optimization. Chimia 51, 213–217

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heinzle E, Weirich D, Brogli D, Hoffmann VH et al. (1998): Ecological and economic objective functions for screening in integrated development of fine chemical processes. 1. Flexible and expandable framework using indices. Ind Eng Chem Res 37, 3395–3407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Simond O (2001): Personal Communication. CIMO S.A.

  16. Hischier R, Baitz M, Bretz R, Frischknecht R et al. (2003): SETAC LCA Working Group Data Availability and Data Quality, Subgroup 3: Recommended List of Exchanges (in print)

  17. Colomb G (2001): Emission Abatement at the Chemical Plant in Monthey. CIMO SA, Monthey, Switzerland (confidential)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kirk RE, Othmer DE (eds.) (1991): Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weissermel K, Arpe H-J (1998): Industrial Organic Chemistry. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tomlin CDS (ed.) (1997): The Pesticide Manual. British Crop Protection Council, 11th ed.

  21. Beilstein CrossFire plus Reactions (2000). MDL Information Systems GmbH, Frankfurt, 5th ed.

  22. Production Data for an Active Ingredient for Crop Protection and its Precursor (2001): Syngenta Crop Protection SA, Basel, Switzerland (confidential)

  23. Standard Operation Procedure in Pilot Scale for the Production of an Active Ingredient for Crop Protection (1990): Syngenta Crop Protection SA, Basel, Switzerland (confidential)

  24. Utility Demands of Three Multipurpose-Batch Production Buildings, from the Years 1998–2001 (2001): CIBA Speciality Chemicals SA, Basel, Switzerland (confidential)

  25. Frischknecht R (1999): Umweltrelevanz natürlicher Kältemittel; ökobilanzen von Wärmepumpen und Kälteanlagen, Anhang zum Schlussbericht. (Relevance of Natural Cooling Agents; LCIs of Heat Pumps and Cooling Installations). Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Bern, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  26. Coers KJ (2002): Personal Communication. Syngenta Crop Protection, Basel, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  27. Technical Guidance Document in Support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for New Notified Sub- stances and Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for Existing Substances (1996): European Commission, Luxembourg

  28. Hofstetter TB, Capello C, Hungerbühler K (2003): Environmentally Preferable Treatment Options for Industrial Waste Solvent Management: A Case Study of a Toluene-Containing Waste Solvent. Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, Part B 81, 189–202

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G et al. (2001): CML-Guide to Life Cycle Assessment. Centre of Environmental Studies, Leiden University (CML), Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  30. Morgan MG, Henrion M (1990): Uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  31. Data on Utility Inputs into and Emissions from the Chemical Waste Incinerator and the Wastewater Treatment Plant at the Monthey Production Site (2000): CIMO SA, Monthey, Switzerland

  32. Cost Sheets on Production Processes for Fine and Speciality Chemicals (2002): Syngenta Crop Protection, Basel, Switzerland (confidential)

  33. Cost Sheets on Production Processes for Fine and Speciality Chemicals (2002): SF-Chem, Basel, Switzerland (confidential)

  34. Standard Operation Procedure for the Pilot Production of a Speciality Chemical (1987): Syngenta Crop Protection, Basel, Switzerland (confidential)

  35. Database of Mass and Energy Balances of Chemical Production Processes (1996): Syngenta Crop Protection, Basel, Switzerland (confidential)

  36. Busson J (1998): Position Paper on Responsible Care. International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA). http:// www.icca-chem.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Geisler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geisler, G., Hofstetter, T.B. & Hungerbühler, K. Production of fine and speciality chemicals: procedure for the estimation of LCIs. Int J LCA 9, 101–113 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978569

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978569

Keywords

Navigation