Juznoslovenski filolog 2020 Volume 76, Issue 2, Pages: 79-103
https://doi.org/10.2298/JFI2002079B
Full text ( 684 KB)
Cited by
In search of an ethnolinguistic paradigm: A glossary of key terms and concepts
Bartmiński Jerzy M. (Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin Department of Textology and Grammar of Contemporary Polish Language), jerzy.bartminski@poczta.umcs.lublin.pl
The paper’s author examines to what extent ethnolingustics meets the
paradigmatic criteria according to Thomas Kuhn (“A paradigm is the thing
that divides the members of the scientific community and vice versa, the
scientific community connects people sharing a certain paradigm”) and
compares the key terms which constitute this discipline’s instrumentarium.
The author focuses on the researchers gathered around the international
annual titled Etnolingwistyka, the representatives of the approach known as
the Lublin School of Cognitive Ethnolinguistics. Two dictionaries are
representative of the School: Słownik stereotypów i symboli ludowych (Vol.
1-2, 1996-2020) and the five-volume lexicon titled Leksykon aksjologiczny
Słowian i ich sąsiadów (2015-2019). According to the author, based on these
two dictionaries and the accompanying publications, it is already possible
to compile a glossary of key terms of ethnolinguistics. Such glossary would
consist of several key concepts: the linguistic worldview, concept
(synonymous with “stereotype”), viewpoint and perspective, cognitive
definition, profiling and profile, subject, values, etc. This terminological
apparatus was particularly used in the creation of the said axiological
lexicon and has now become the common good of the whole team of authors.
This corresponds to Kuhn’s second postulate.
Keywords: scientific paradigm, cognitive ethnolinguistics, glossary (terminological dictionary) of ethnolinguistics, linguistic worldview, concept, stereotype