Elsevier

Science of The Total Environment

Volumes 599–600, 1 December 2017, Pages 1275-1287
Science of The Total Environment

The role of mobilisation and delivery processes on contrasting dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus exports in groundwater fed catchments

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.091Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Mobilisation processes drive N and P exports in contrasted groundwater-fed catchments.

  • Important interactions are highlighted with land use, soil chemistry and climate.

  • Mobilisation is influenced by near-stream attenuation of N and enrichment of P.

  • Pollution swapping risks are highlighted in the context of land use change.

Abstract

Diffuse transfer of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in agricultural catchments is controlled by the mobilisation of sources and their delivery to receiving waters. While plot scale experiments have focused on mobilisation processes, many catchment scale studies have hitherto concentrated on the controls of dominant flow pathways on nutrient delivery. To place mobilisation and delivery at a catchment scale, this study investigated their relative influence on contrasting nitrate-N and soluble P concentrations and N:P ratios in two shallow groundwater fed catchments with different land use (grassland and arable) on the Atlantic seaboard of Europe. Detailed datasets of N and P inputs, concentrations in shallow groundwater and concentrations in receiving streams were analysed over a five year period (October 2010–September 2015). Results showed that nitrate-N and soluble P concentrations in shallow groundwater give a good indication of stream concentrations, which suggests a dominant control of mobilisation processes on stream exports. Near-stream attenuation of nitrate-N (− 30%), likely through denitrification and dilution, and enrichment in soluble P (+ 100%), through soil-groundwater interactions, were similar in both catchments. The soil, climate and land use controls on mobilisation were also investigated. Results showed that grassland tended to limit nitrate-N leaching as compared to arable land, but grassland could also contribute to increased P solubilisation. In the context of land use change in these groundwater fed systems, the risk of pollution swapping between N and P must be carefully considered, particularly for interactions of land use with soil chemistry and climate.

Introduction

Land-to-water transfer of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) is a major concern worldwide as excessive concentrations of these two nutrients cause eutrophication in freshwater and marine ecosystems (Conley et al., 2009). Diffuse emissions from agricultural origin can represent a significant contribution to annual N and P loads in rivers (Dupas et al., 2015a).

Mitigation measures to decrease N and P emissions from agricultural landscapes must rely on underpinning research to understand mobilisation and delivery mechanisms in order to be effective and several mechanisms have been identified (Lloyd et al., 2016, Mellander et al., 2012, Outram et al., 2016). It is generally accepted that N is prone to vertical leaching from the soil, through the unsaturated zone down to the saturated zone. It can then be transferred to surface waters, mainly as nitrate, via groundwater (Legout et al., 2007, Mellander et al., 2014, Molenat et al., 2008). Nitrate mobilised below the rooting zone may be subject to denitrification, which generally takes place within anoxic groundwaters, riparian wetlands and the hyporheic zone (Anderson et al., 2014, McAleer et al., 2017, Oehler et al., 2007). Mobilised nitrate may also have long time lags between mobilisation and emergence, due to the potentially long transit time of water in the unsaturated and saturated zone (Fovet et al., 2015, Hrachowitz et al., 2010). Phosphorus has a higher adsorption affinity with the soil compared to nitrate; as a result it is less soluble and is less prone to leaching. A general understanding is that P is typically transferred to surface waters via surface pathways, either in soluble or particulate form (Sharpley et al., 2008). However, several studies have highlighted the possibility of soluble P leaching into shallow groundwater and subsequent lateral transfer to surface water as a dominant mechanism in groundwater-fed catchments (e.g. Dupas et al., 2015c, Haygarth et al., 1998, Holman et al., 2010, Mellander et al., 2016, van der Salm et al., 2011).

Nitrate and soluble P leaching is controlled by several factors, some of which are manageable and some of which are inherent properties of soils and climate. Nitrate leaching is controlled by i) the balance between fertiliser inputs and crop uptake on an annual basis; ii) soil mineralisation, which increases when the soil C:N ratio is low and when favourable moisture and temperature conditions are met (Rodrigo et al., 1997); iii) temporal mismatches between crop uptake capacity and high nitrate concentration in the soil combined with high drainage potential (particularly in autumn, Dupas et al., 2015d). In temperate regions, grasslands have been shown to have a better capacity to take up N from the soil throughout the year, particularly in the autumn period, compared to cropland (McDowell et al., 2014, Moreau et al., 2012), although urine patches in grazed grassland can be hotspots of nitrate leaching.

Soluble P leaching is controlled by i) the soil P content, as determined by soil P tests; ii) soil chemistry, particularly the abundance of iron (Fe) and aluminium (Al) oxides, which are important adsorption sites in acidic soils (Daly et al., 2015, Schoumans and Chardon, 2015); iii) temporal variation of soil pH, redox state (Henderson et al., 2012) and drying-rewetting or freezing-thawing cycles (Blackwell et al., 2010); iv) organic matter (OM) content, which may control the formation of Fe-bound organic P colloids that are more mobile than truly soluble P (Granger et al., 2007), and which influences the concentration of dissolved organic matter (DOM) that can compete with P for adsorption sites (Kang et al., 2009); v) land use, particularly the presence of grassland, which is often associated with high OM content in soil and which may release root exudates that stimulate the microbial biomass and bring P into solution (Roberts et al., 2013). Grassland may also favour preferential flow paths through macropores, enhancing nitrate and soluble P transport (Djodjic et al., 2004, Gachter et al., 1998).

Several studies comparing the export behaviour of N and P in agricultural catchments along the Atlantic seaboard of Europe have highlighted the crucial role played by dominant flow pathways on export patterns (e.g. Lloyd et al., 2016, Mellander et al., 2012, Outram et al., 2016). In general, well-drained catchments are prone to nitrate leaching and subsequent transfer via groundwater, whereas poorly-drained catchments can transfer large masses of P via surface flow pathways (Jordan et al., 2012, McDowell et al., 2014). However, few studies have compared catchments with similar dominant flow pathways to investigate the role of mobilisation and delivery mechanisms at this small catchment scale.

The main aim of this paper, therefore, was to investigate mobilisation processes (i.e. leaching) as an important role in the transfer continuum of nitrate-N and soluble P in groundwater-fed catchments. This was undertaken by monitoring the nutrient transfer continuum, from source to mobilisation and from mobilisation to delivery (Haygarth et al., 2005), in two intensively studied agricultural catchments (with similar groundwater fed systems) on the Atlantic seaboard of Europe. A detailed survey of N and P input and content in soil was used to characterise the sources, nitrate-N and soluble P concentration in shallow groundwater was used to characterise the amount of nutrient being mobilised below the rooting zone and comparison of groundwater and stream nitrate-N and soluble P concentration was used to characterise delivery. The specific objectives were to i) investigate the respective influence of mobilisation and delivery mechanisms on contrasting nitrate-N and soluble P concentrations and N:P ratios in the two catchments and ii) analyse the respective controls of soil properties, climate and land use on nitrate-N and soluble P mobilisation. We use this analysis to explore some implications for the future trajectory (i.e. evolution under changing external forces) of diffusion pollution in these and similar catchment types under land use and climate change scenarios.

Section snippets

Study areas

This investigation took place in two intensively farmed catchments in the pedo-climatic zone of the Atlantic seaboard of Europe, in Western France and South-western Ireland (Fig. 1).

The French catchment, Kervidy-Naizin, belongs to the AgrHyS environmental research observatory, where the impacts of agriculture and climate change on water quality are studied (Aubert et al., 2013). Kervidy-Naizin is a 5 km2 catchment drained by a stream of second Strahler order. Climate is temperate oceanic, with

Temporal variability in the hydroclimate, nitrogen and phosphorus loads

The Kervidy-Naizin and the Timoleague catchments appeared to be affected by similar seasonal weather patterns but different inter-annual weather patterns. Both catchments were characterised by mild temperatures and the occurrence of rainfall throughout the year (Table 1; Fig. 2 a and b); mean annual temperature was slightly but significantly higher in Kervidy-Naizin (11.3 ± 0.5 °C versus 10.1 ± 0.5 °C, p < 0.05) but the annual cumulated rainfall was not significantly different in both catchments (938 ± 

Conclusion

In two groundwater-driven and intensively farmed catchments on the Atlantic seaboard of Europe (Western France and Southwest Ireland), mobilisation processes appeared to play a dominant role in the contrasting export of nitrate-N and soluble P from land to the receiving streams. Nitrate-N leaching was mainly controlled by mineralisation and the timing of plant uptake: grasslands have a longer growth period and better utilisation of N than cropland, hence grasslands reduced nitrate-N leaching.

Acknowledgement

Long-term monitoring in the Kervidy-Naizin catchment is supported by ‘ORE AgrHyS’ (http://www6.inra.fr/ore_agrhys_eng). Monitoring in the Timoleague catchment is a part of the ‘Agricultural Catchments Programme’ (http://www.teagasc.ie/agcatchments/) funded by the Irish Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine. The authors would like to thank all those who helped with the field and lab work.

References (69)

  • C. Legout et al.

    Solute transfer in the unsaturated zone-groundwater continuum of a headwater catchment

    J. Hydrol.

    (2007)
  • C.E.M. Lloyd et al.

    Using hysteresis analysis of high-resolution water quality monitoring data, including uncertainty, to infer controls on nutrient and sediment transfer in catchments

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2016)
  • E.B. McAleer et al.

    Groundwater nitrate reduction versus dissolved gas production: a tale of two catchments

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2017)
  • R.W. McDowell et al.

    Contrasting the spatial management of nitrogen and phosphorus for improved water quality: modelling studies in New Zealand and France

    Eur. J. Agron.

    (2014)
  • A.R. Melland et al.

    Stream water quality in intensive cereal cropping catchments with regulated nutrient management

    Environ. Sci. Pol.

    (2012)
  • P.-E. Mellander et al.

    Quantifying nutrient transfer pathways in agricultural catchments using high temporal resolution data

    Environ. Sci. Pol.

    (2012)
  • P.E. Mellander et al.

    Identifying contrasting influences and surface water signals for specific groundwater phosphorus vulnerability

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2016)
  • J. Molenat et al.

    Role of water table dynamics on stream nitrate export and concentration in agricultural headwater catchment (France)

    J. Hydrol.

    (2008)
  • P. Moreau et al.

    Modeling the potential benefits of catch-crop introduction in fodder crop rotations in a Western Europe landscape

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2012)
  • P.N.C. Murphy et al.

    Variable response to phosphorus mitigation measures across the nutrient transfer continuum in a dairy grassland catchment

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2015)
  • A. Musolff et al.

    Catchment controls on solute export

    Adv. Water Resour.

    (2015)
  • M.C. Ockenden et al.

    Changing climate and nutrient transfers: evidence from high temporal resolution concentration-flow dynamics in headwater catchments

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2016)
  • F. Oehler et al.

    Variations of denitrification in a farming catchment area

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2007)
  • F.N. Outram et al.

    Antecedent conditions, hydrological connectivity and anthropogenic inputs: factors affecting nitrate and phosphorus transfers to agricultural headwater streams

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2016)
  • H. Pauwels et al.

    Field tracer test for denitrification in a pyrite-bearing schist aquifer

    Appl. Geochem.

    (1998)
  • M. Rode et al.

    Impact of selected agricultural management options on the reduction of nitrogen loads in three representative meso scale catchments in Central Germany

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2009)
  • A. Rodrigo et al.

    Modelling temperature and moisture effects on C-N transformations in soils: comparison of nine models

    Ecol. Model.

    (1997)
  • O.F. Schoumans et al.

    Phosphate saturation degree and accumulation of phosphate in various soil types in The Netherlands

    Geoderma

    (2015)
  • M. Shore et al.

    Evaluating the critical source area concept of phosphorus loss from soils to water-bodies in agricultural catchments

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2014)
  • D. Wall et al.

    Using the nutrient transfer continuum concept to evaluate the European Union Nitrates Directive National Action Programme

    Environ. Sci. Pol.

    (2011)
  • T.R. Anderson et al.

    Shallow groundwater denitrification in riparian zones of a headwater agricultural landscape

    J. Environ. Qual.

    (2014)
  • H. Andersson et al.

    The role of subsoil as a source or sink for phosphorus leaching

    J. Environ. Qual.

    (2015)
  • A.H. Aubert et al.

    Solute transport dynamics in small, shallow groundwater-dominated agricultural catchments: insights from a high-frequency, multisolute 10 year-long monitoring study

    Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.

    (2013)
  • N.B. Basu et al.

    Nutrient loads exported from managed catchments reveal emergent biogeochemical stationarity

    Geophys. Res. Lett.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text