Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

DNA methylation and detection of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions using molecular methods

  • Review
  • Published:
Tumor Biology

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the third most common cancer disease affecting the female population, and a key factor in the development of the disease is the human papillomavirus infection (HPV). The disease is also impacted by epigenetic changes such as DNA methylation, which causes activation or exclusion of certain genes. The aim of our review is to summarize and compare the most common molecular methods for detection of methylated promoter regions in biomarkers occurring in cervical carcinoma and also show the importance of connections of HR-HPV testing with methylation analysis in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Insight into genetic and epigenetic alterations associated with cervical cancer development can offer opportunities for the molecular biomarkers that can be useful for screening, diagnosis, and also as new ways of treatment of cervical cancer precursor lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer. GLOBOCAN, 2008.

  2. Sung LC, et al. Methylation markers for diagnosis of cervical cancer, Patent application publication, 2013.

  3. Steenbergen R, Snijders P, Heideman D, et al. Clinical implications of (epi) genetic changes in HPV-induced cervical precancerous lesions. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:395–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arbyn M, Roelens J, Cuschieri K, et al. The APTIMA HPV assay versus the Hybrid Caoture II test in triage of women with ASC-US or LSIL cervical cytology: a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy. Int J Cancer. 2013;132(1):101–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Janusicova V, Mendelova A, Zubor P, et al. mRNA Expression in cervical specimens for determination of severe dysplasia or worse in HPV-16/18-positive squamous lesions. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2014;18(3):273–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fiolka R, Zubor P, Holubekova V, et al. Promoter hypermethylation of the tumor-suppresor genes RASSF1A, GSTP1 and CDH1 in endometrial cancer. Oncol Rep. 2013;30(6):2878–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Visnovsky J, Fiolka R, Kudela E, et al. Hypermethylation of selected genes in endometrial carcinogenesis. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2013;34(7):675–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Culbova M, Lasabova Z, Stanclova A, et al. Metylácia vybraných tumor-supresorových génov v benígnych a malígnych ovariálnych nádoroch. Article in Czech. Česká gynekologie. 2011;76(4):274–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zubor P, Kajo K, Stanclova A, et al. Human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 polymorphism and risk of fibroadenoma. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2008;17(1):33–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas LK, Bermejo JL, Vinokurova S, et al. Chromosomal gains and losses in human papillomavirus-associated neoplasia of the lower genital tract—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(1):85–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bierkens M, Krijqsman O, Wilting S, et al. Focal aberrations indicate EYA2 and hsa-miR-375 as oncogene and tumor suppressor in cervical carcinogenesis. Genes Chromosom Cancer. 2013;52(1):56–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kudela E, Farkasova A, Visnovsky J, et al. Amplification of 3q26 and 5p15 regions in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93(10):997–1002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Visnovsky J, Kudela E, Farkasova A, et al. Amplification of TERT and TERC genes in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2014;35(6):518–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wajed SA, Laird PW, DeMeester TR, et al. DNA methylation: an alternative pathway to cancer. Ann Surg. 2001;234(1):10–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Merlo A, Herman JG, Mao L, et al. 5’CpG Island methylation is associated with transcirptional silencing of the tumor suppressor gene p16/CDKN2/MTS1 in human cancers. Nat Med. 1995;1(7):686–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mayrand MH, Duarte-Franco E, Rodrigues I, et al. Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1579–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Szalmas A, Konya J. Epigenetic alterations in cervical carcinogenesis. Semin Cancer Biol. 2009;19(3):144–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Herfs M, Yamamoto Y, Laury A, et al. A discrete population of squamocolumnar junction cells implicated in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109:10516–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wentzensen N, Sherman ME, Schiffman M, et al. Utility of methylation markers in cervical cancer early detection: appraisal of the state-of-the science. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112(2):293–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hesselink AT, Heideman DA, Steenbergen RD, et al. Combined promoter methylation analysis of CADM1 and MAL: an objective triage tool for high-risk human papillomavirus DNA-positive women. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:2459–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eijsink JJ, Lendvai Á, Deregowski V, et al. A four-gene methylation marker panel as triage test in hig-hrisk human papillomavirus positive patients. Int J Cancer. 2012;130(8):1861–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bierkens M, Hesselink AT, Meijer CJ, et al. CADM1 and MAL promoter methylation levels in hrHPV-positive cervical scrapes increase proportional to degree and duration of underlying cervical disease. Int J Cancer. 2013;133:1293–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fraga MF, Esteller M. DNA methylation: a profile of methods and applications. Biotechniques. 2002;33(4):6–49.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Swift- Scanlan T, Blackford A, Argani P, et al. Two-color quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR. Biotechniques. 2006;40(2):210–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiménez I, Cardeñosa EE, Suela SP, et al. Advantages of the high resolution melting in the detection of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Clin Biochem. 2009;42:1572–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Snellenberg S, De Strooper LM, Hesselink AT, et al. Development of a multiplex methylation-specific PCR as candidate triage test for women with an HPV-positive cervical scrape. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:551.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bian YS, Yan P, Osterheld MC, et al. Promoter methylation analysis on microdissected paraffin-embedded tissues using bisulfi te treatment and PCR- SSCP. Biotechniques. 2001;30(1):66–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Steenbergen RD, Kramer D, Braahuis BJ, et al. TSLC1 gene silencing in cervical cancer cell lines and cervical neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(4):294–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Xiong Z, Laird PW. COBRA: a sensitive and quantitative DNA methylation assay. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(12):2532–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rauch TA, Pfeifer GP. The MIRA method for DNA methylation analysis. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;507:65–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hyman ED. A new method of sequencing DNA. Anal Biochem. 1988;174:423–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mikeska T, Felsberg J, Hewitt CA, et al. Analysing DNA methylation using bisulphite pyrosequencing. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;791:33–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006;367(9509):489–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wright AA, Howitt BB, Myers AP, et al. Oncogenic mutations in cervical cancer: genomic differences between adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix. Cancer. 2013;119:3776–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kocken J, Helmerhorst TJ, Bekhof J, et al. Risk of recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful treatment: a long-term multi-cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(5):441–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, et al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008;337:284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the project “Molecular diagnostics of cervical cancer” (ITMS:26220220113), Comenius University Grants 303/2011, 242/2012, 287/2015, 121/2015, and the VEGA Grant 1/0271/12 as well as the APVV-0224-12 grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcela Nachajova.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mersakova, S., Nachajova, M., Szepe, P. et al. DNA methylation and detection of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions using molecular methods. Tumor Biol. 37, 23–27 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-4197-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-4197-1

Keywords

Navigation