Abstract
Mechanisms of the assembly of actin stress fibers (SFs) have been extensively studied, while those of the disassembly—particularly cell shortening-induced ones—remain unclear. Here, we show that SFs have helical structures composed of multi-subbundles, and they tend to be delaminated upon cell shortening. Specifically, we observed with atomic force microscopy delamination of helical SFs into their subbundles. We physically caught individual SFs using a pair of glass needles to observe rotational deformations during stretching as well as ATP-driven active contraction, suggesting that they deform in a manner reflecting their intrinsic helical structure. A minimal analytical model was then developed based on the Frenet–Serret formulas with force–strain measurement data to suggest that helical SFs can be delaminated into the constituent subbundles upon axial shortening. Given that SFs are large molecular clusters that bear cellular tension but must promptly disassemble upon loss of the tension, the resulting increase in their surface area due to the shortening-induced delamination may facilitate interaction with surrounding molecules to aid subsequent disintegration. Thus, our results suggest a new mechanism of the disassembly that occurs only in the specific SFs exposed to forced shortening.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balaban NQ, Schwarz US, Riveline D et al (2001) Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat Cell Biol 3:466–472
Burridge K, Wittchen ES (2013) The tension mounts: stress fibers as force generating mechanotransducers. J Cell Biol 200:9–19
Chen CS (2008) Mechanotransduction—a field pulling together? J Cell Sci 121:3285–3292
Chouaieb N, Goriely A, Maddocks JH (2006) Helices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:9398–9403
Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M, Burridge K (1996) Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions. J Cell Biol 133:1403–1415
Costa KD, Hucker WJ, Yin FCP (2002) Buckling of actin stress fibers: a new wrinkle in the cytoskeletal tapestry. Cytoskeleton 52:266–274
Costello GA (1997) Theory of wire rope. Springer, New York
Crenshaw HC, Edelstein-Keshet L (1993) Orientation by helical motion II. Changing the direction of the axis of motion. Bull Math Biol 55:213–230
Deguchi S, Ohashi T, Sato M (2005) Evaluation of tension in actin bundle of endothelial cells based on preexisting strain and tensile properties measurements. Mol Cell Biomech 2:125–133
Deguchi S, Ohashi T, Sato M (2006) Tensile properties of single stress fibers isolated from cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biomech 39:2603–2610
Deguchi S, Matsui TS, Komatsu D, Sato M (2012a) Contraction of stress fibers extracted from smooth muscle cells: effects of varying ionic strength. J Biomech Sci Eng 7:388–398
Deguchi S, Matsui TS, Sato M (2012b) Simultaneous contraction and buckling of stress fibers in individual cells. J Cell Biochem 113:824–832
Goffin JM, Pittet P, Csucs G et al (2006) Focal adhesion size controls tension-dependent recruitment of alpha-smooth muscle actin to stress fibers. J Cell Biol 172:259–268
Gore J, Bryant Z, Nöllmann M et al (2006) DNA overwinds when stretched. Nature 442:836–839
Hahn C, Schwartz MA (2009) Mechanotransduction in vascular physiology and atherogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:53–62
Haines CS, Lima MD, Li N et al (2014) Artificial muscles from fishing line and sewing thread. Science 343:868–872
Hayakawa K, Tatsumi H, Sokabe M (2008) Actin filaments function as a tension sensor by tension-dependent binding of cofilin to the filament. J Cell Biol 195:721–727
Hotulainen P, Lappalainen P (2006) Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells. J Cell Biol 173:383–394
Kassianidou E, Kumar S (2015) A biomechanical perspective on stress fiber structure and function. Biochim Biophys Acta 1853:3065–3074
Katoh K, Kano Y, Masuda M et al (1998) Isolation and contraction of the stress fiber. Mol Biol Cell 9:1919–1938
Katoh K, Kano Y, Amano M et al (2001) Rho-kinase–mediated contraction of isolated stress fibers. J Cell Biol 153:569–583
Kaunas R, Deguchi S (2011) Multiple roles for myosin II in tensional homeostasis under mechanical loading. Cell Mol Bioeng 4:182–191
Kaunas R, Usami S, Chien S (2006) Regulation of stretch-induced JNK activation by stress fiber orientation. Cell Signal 18:1924–1931
Kaunas R, Hsu HJ, Deguchi S (2011) Sarcomeric model of stretch-induced stress fiber reorganization. Cell Health Cytoskeleton 3:13–22
Kimura K, Ito M, Amano M et al (1996) Regulation of myosin phosphatase by Rho and Rho-associated kinase (Rho-kinase). Science 273:245–248
Kumar S, Maxwell IZ, Heisterkamp A et al (2006) Viscoelastic retraction of single living stress fibers and its impact on cell shape, cytoskeletal organization, and extracellular matrix mechanics. Biophys J 90:3762–3773
Lee C, Haase C, Deguchi S, Kaunas R (2010) Cyclic stretch-induced stress fiber dynamics—dependence on strain rate Rho-kinase and MLCK. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 401:344–349
Livne A, Geiger B (2016) The inner workings of stress fibers—from contractile machinery to focal adhesions and back. J Cell Sci 129:1293–1304
Lu L, Feng Y, Hucker WJ et al (2008) Actin stress fiber pre-extension in human aortic endothelial cells. Cytoskeleton 65:281–294
Matsui TS, Deguchi S (2019) Spatially selective MRLC regulation is absent in dedifferentiated vascular smooth muscle cells but is partially induced by fibronectin and Klf4. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 316:C509–C521
Matsui TS, Ito K, Kaunas R et al (2010) Actin stress fibers are at a tipping point between conventional shortening and rapid disassembly at physiological levels of MgATP. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 395:301–306
Matsui TS, Kaunas R, Kanzaki M et al (2011) Non-muscle myosin II induces disassembly of actin stress fibres independently of myosin light chain dephosphorylation. Interface Focus 1:754–766
Nagayama K, Kimura Y, Makino N, Matsumoto T (2012) Strain waveform dependence of stress fiber reorientation in cyclically stretched osteoblastic cells: effects of viscoelastic compression of stress fibers. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 302:C1469–C1478
Ogawa T, Nitta R, Okada Y, Hirokawa N (2004) A common mechanism for microtubule destabilizers–M type kinesins stabilize curling of the protofilament using the class-specific neck and loops. Cell 116:591–602
Phillips JW, Costello GA (1978) General axial response of stranded wire helical springs. Int J Non-Linear Mech 14:247–257
Sato K, Adachi T, Matsuo M, Tomita Y (2005) Quantitative evaluation of threshold fiber strain that induces reorganization of cytoskeletal actin fiber structure in osteoblastic cells. J Biomech 38:1895–1901
Tan JL, Tien J, Pirone DM et al (2003) Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: an approach to isolate mechanical force. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:1484–1489
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Mitsuji Kaji (Tohoku University) for technical support in EM.
Funding
This study was funded by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 18H03518, 16H05907, 26750140, and 26560208.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Okamoto, T., Matsui, T.S., Ohishi, T. et al. Helical structure of actin stress fibers and its possible contribution to inducing their direction-selective disassembly upon cell shortening. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19, 543–555 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01228-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01228-z