Skip to main content

Cavitation in Rubber Vulcanizates Subjected to Constrained Tensile Deformation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fatigue Crack Growth in Rubber Materials

Part of the book series: Advances in Polymer Science ((POLYMER,volume 286))

Abstract

The deformation and failure behavior of rubbers is significantly influenced by the chemical composition and loading conditions. Investigations on how specific loading parameters affect the mechanical behavior of rubbers are elementary for designing elastomeric products. Suitable fracture mechanical concepts describing the failure behavior of rubbers are widely accepted in industrial and academic research. However, the most common failure analyses base on macroscopic approaches which do not consider microscopic damage, although a contribution of (micro)structural changes at the network scale on the overall mechanical properties is very likely. A special phenomenon in terms of microstructural failure is cavitation due to strain constraints. Under geometrical constraints, the lateral contraction is suppressed. As a result, stress triaxiality causes inhomogeneous deformation, and internal defects, so-called cavities, appear. The formation and growth of cavities release stress and reduce the degree of constraints. Cavitation in rubbers has been studied for several decades, but the knowledge about the fundamental mechanisms triggering this process is still very limited. The present study aimed to characterize and describe cavitation in rubbers comprehensively. Hence, advanced experimental techniques, such as dilatometry and microtomography, have been used for in situ investigations on pancake specimens. Such thin disk-shaped rubber samples are characterized by a high aspect ratio. As a result, the degree of stress triaxiality is high, and the dominating hydrostatic tensile stress component causes the initiation of cavitation. Of special interest was the often suspected cavitation in unfilled rubbers. In contrast to the literature, cavitation in rubbers is not exclusively attributed to interfacial failure between the soft rubber matrix and rigid filler particles, but occurs also in unfilled rubbers. The onset of cavitation was determined precisely by highly sensitive data acquisition. Both a stress-related and an energy-based cavitation criteria were found indicating that traditional approaches predicting cavitation overestimate the material resistance against cavitation. The presented experimental methods to characterize cavitation are suitable for future studies investigating further aspects of cavitation in rubbers and other rubberlike materials, e.g., the failure behavior under dynamic loading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schippel HF (1920) Volume increase of compounded rubber under strain. Ind Eng Chem Res 12:33–37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Busse WF (1938) Physics of rubber as related to the automobile. J Appl Phys 9:438–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yerzley FL (1939) Adhesion of neoprene to metal. Ind Eng Chem Res 31:950–956

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gent AN, Lindley PB (1961) Internal rupture of bonded rubber cylinders in tension. Rubber Chem Technol 34:925–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gent AN, Lindley PB (1957) Internal flaws in bonded cylinders of soft vulcanized rubber subjected to tensile loads. Nature 180:912–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gent AN, Tompkins DA (1969) Surface energy effects for small holes or particles in elastomers. J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed 7:1483–1487

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gent AN, Park B (1984) Failure processes in elastomers at or near a rigid spherical inclusion. J Mater Sci 19:1947–1956

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Holt WL, McPherson AT (1937) Change of volume of rubber on stretching: effects of time, elongation, and temperature. Rubber Chem Technol 10:412–431

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shinomura T, Takahashi M (1970) Volume change measurements of filled rubber Vulcanizates under stretching. Rubber Chem Technol 43:1025–1035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chenal J-M, Gauthier C, Chazeau L, Guy L, Bomal Y (2007) Parameters governing strain induced crystallization in filled natural rubber. Polymer 48:6893–6901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hocine NA, Hamdi A, Naït Abdelaziz M, Heuillet P, Zaïri F (2011) Experimental and finite element investigation of void nucleation in rubber-like materials. Int J Solids Struct 48:1248–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kakavas PA, Chang WV (1991) Acoustic emission in bonded elastomer discs subjected to uniform tension. II. J Appl Polym Sci 42:1997–2004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tunnicliffe LB, Thomas AG, Busfield JJC (2011) Light scattering and transmission studies of nanofiller particulate size, matrix cavitation, and high strain interfacial dewetting behavior in silica-elastomer composites. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 49:1084–1092

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bayraktar E, Antolonovich S, Bathias C (2006) Multiscale study of fatigue behaviour of composite materials by X-rays computed tomography. Int J Fatigue 28:1322–1333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Le Saux V, Marco Y, Calloch S, Charrier P (2011) Evaluation of the fatigue defect population in an elastomer using X-ray computed micro-tomography. Polym Eng Sci 51:1253–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Le Gorju Jago K (2012) X-ray computed microtomography of rubber. Rubber Chem Technol 85:387–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huneau B, Masquelier I, Marco Y, Le Saux V, Noizet S, Schiel C, Charrier P (2016) Fatigue crack initiation in a carbon black–filled natural rubber. Rubber Chem Technol 89:126–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dorfmann A, Fuller KNG, Ogden RW (2003) Busfield J, Muhr A (eds) Modelling dilatational stress softening of rubber in constitutive models for rubber III. CRC Press, pp 253–261

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cristiano A, Marcellan A, Long R, Hui C-Y, Stolk J, Creton C (2010) An experimental investigation of fracture by cavitation of model elastomeric networks. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 48:1409–1422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Poulain X, Lefèvre V, Lopez-Pamies O, Ravi-Chandar K (2017) Damage in elastomers: nucleation and growth of cavities, micro-cracks, and macro-cracks. Int J Fract 205:1–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ono H, Nait-Ali A, Kane Diallo O, Benoit G, Castagnet S (2018) Influence of pressure cycling on damage evolution in an unfilled EPDM exposed to high-pressure hydrogen. Int J Fract 210:137–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Creton C, Ciccotti M (2016) Fracture and adhesion of soft materials: a review. Rep Prog Phys 79:046601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stratigaki M, Baumann C, van Breemen LCA, Heuts JPA, Sijbesma RP, Göstl R (2020) Fractography of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogel networks crosslinked with mechanofluorophores using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Polym Chem 11:358–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Valentín JL, Posadas P, Fernández-Torres A, Malmierca MA, González L, Chassé W, Saalwächter K (2010) Inhomogeneities and chain dynamics in diene rubbers vulcanized with different cure systems. Macromolecules 43:4210–4222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gent A (2012) Engineering with rubber – how to design rubber components. Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Drass M, Schwind G, Schneider J, Kolling S (2017) Adhesive connections in glass structures—part I: experiments and analytics on thin structural silicone. Glass Struct Eng 3:39–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kuna M (2013) Finite elements in fracture mechanics. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Euchler E, Bernhardt R, Schneider K, Heinrich G, Wießner S, Tada T (2020) In situ dilatometry and X-ray microtomography study on the formation and growth of cavities in unfilled styrene-butadiene-rubber vulcanizates subjected to constrained tensile deformation. Polymer 187:122086

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pavlov AS, Khalatur PG (2016) Filler reinforcement in cross-linked elastomer nanocomposites: insights from fully atomistic molecular dynamics simulation. Soft Matter 12:5402–5419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pourmodheji R, Qu S, Yu H (2017) Two possible defect growth modes in soft solids. J Appl Mech 85:0310011–03100110

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mars WV, Fatemi A (2006) Nucleation and growth of small fatigue cracks in filled natural rubber under multiaxial loading. J Mater Sci 41:7324–7332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Marzocca AJ, Salgueiro W, Somoza A (2013) Visakh PM, Thomas S, Chandra AK, Mathew AP (eds) Physical phenomena related to free volumes in rubber and blends in advances in elastomers II: composites and Nanocomposites. Springer, Berlin, pp 399–426

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yamaguchi T, Koike K, Doi M (2007) In situ observation of stereoscopic shapes of cavities in soft adhesives. EPL 77:64002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd., Japan, for generous financial support. Also, the authors thank Dr. Vogel, Dr. Boldt, and Ms. Auf der Landwehr for providing SEM images. Ms. C. Scheibe is acknowledged for assistance in the graphical work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to E. Euchler or M. Stommel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Euchler, E. et al. (2020). Cavitation in Rubber Vulcanizates Subjected to Constrained Tensile Deformation. In: Heinrich, G., Kipscholl, R., Stoček, R. (eds) Fatigue Crack Growth in Rubber Materials. Advances in Polymer Science, vol 286. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/12_2020_65

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics