Effects of communication style and culture on ability to accept recommendations from robots

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.025Get rights and content

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to investigate the effects of communication styles and culture on people’s accepting recommendations from robots. The goal was to provide insight for culturally adaptive robot design. The independent variables were communication style (i.e. implicit or explicit), the participants’ cultural background (i.e. Chinese or German), and the robot’s language (i.e. native language and English for Chinese and German subjects). A laboratory experiment was conducted with 16 Chinese and 16 German college students. Basic descriptive statistics and t-test are used for biographical information analysis; reliability test is used for questionnaire; MANOVA and non-parametric test are used for testing the hypotheses. The results showed that the Chinese participants preferred an implicit communication style than German participants. Chinese participants evaluated the robots as being more likable, trustworthy, and credible, and were more likely to accept the implicit recommendations. The German participants evaluated the robots as being less likable, trustworthy, and credible, and were less inclined to accept implicit recommendations.

Introduction

Social robots are a rapidly growing area of interest for researchers. The characteristics of social robots include the ability to interact with humans in ways that are more natural, through more complex understanding and exhibition of social cues that humans normally use in communication. Reeves and Nass in 1996 studied the interactions between humans and computers or televisions, and the results showed that even a minimal level of social cues present in an interface or technological artifact leads people to treat the system in a way psychologically similar to how they would treat another person. It can be expected that similar, but stronger effects will be found between the interactions between humans and social robots (Kidd, 2003). In human society, trust, and preference are important for people to accept recommendations from other people. When a robot acts as an advisor in public, these aspects are expected to influence people’s decisions.

Past studies about communication between humans have revealed that language has various functions for communicative behaviors (Patricia, 1997, Wolfram, 1997). Moreover, the influences of culture in communication have been investigated in linguistics and cultural anthropology. Culture underlies every aspect of social behavior and helps to define the rules and patterns of each language. Thus, individual communicative behaviors are reflective of one’s language and culture (Patricia, 1997).

If an agent is designed only according to the designers’ cultural background, the end users whose cultural background is different from the designers’ may suffer from the culturally biased communication. Such communication failures will impede system performance and consequently lower their evaluations. To solve this problem, the concept of culturally adaptive agents is introduced. Such agents have two features: firstly, having the ability to detect different forms of communicative behaviors, and secondly, can respond to them appropriately. The designers can only build up such agents by recognizing the cultural differences existing in the communications either between human and agents or between human and human, and then consider the differences when designing (Patricia, 1997).

Although many researchers have realized the influence of cultural differences in human–robot interaction, very few studies have been conducted to investigate this factor and no convincing explanations of these differences have been made. The majority of previous experiments carried out by researchers from America, Japan, the UK, and many other countries have mainly been based on the native population, and some of the conclusions may not be generalized to other cultures. Only by recognizing and considering such influences in the design of agents can robots communicate with people from cultures different from those of their designers without any cultural bias. Thus, the objective of this paper is to investigate how a robot’s language and communication style will influence people with different cultural backgrounds.

Section snippets

Literature review

In the following the factors which are investigated in this study and also the previous research results related are shown. These factors are communication style, culture, trust, and source credibility.

Research framework and hypotheses

This paper focuses on the effects of communication style and culture on accepting recommendations from robots. The three factors considered were the participant’s cultural background (i.e. Chinese or German, who have lived in the target culture for at least 10 years), communication style (i.e. explicit or implicit), and the robot’s language (native language and English for the participants from China and Germany, who can understand and speak both their native language and English). The

Task and participants

A price judgment task was designed in which participants selected a price range for a product from two options. The robot commented on the initial selection, either positively or negatively. Then the participants have an opportunity to change their decision and make a final selection. During the task, both the initial selection and final selection were recorded.

Thirty-two participants were invited to take part in the experiment to test the hypotheses: 16 Chinese and 16 German participants. To

Participants

The hypotheses were tested by 32 volunteers (i.e. 16 German and 16 Chinese) who participated in the experiment. Most of the participants were university students. The results of the t-test on biographical information between Chinese and German participants were shown in Table 5. There are significant difference on age and previous experience with robot between Chinese and German participants; no significant difference on gender and previous experience with Lego.

Three questions were asked in the

Results

The Hypothesis 2 that German participants will rate the robot lower on likeability, trust, and source credibility scale and accept the robot’s recommendations fewer times than Chinese participants is validated. But the Hypothesis 3 that Chinese participants will accept the robot’s recommendations more often when the robot speaks in Chinese than when it speaks in English is not validated. Chinese people gave higher evaluations on the trust scale, likability scale, source credibility scale, and

Discussion

These results that that German participants will rate the robot lower on likeability, trust, and source credibility scale and accept the robot’s recommendations fewer times than Chinese participants can be explained by the cultural dimensions of individualism and collectivism. According to Hall’s theory, Germany has an individualistic culture, which emphasizes individual initiative and reliance on individual decisions. Chinese culture is a typically collectivistic society, and Chinese people

Conclusions

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of communication style and cultural difference on acceptability of recommendations from robots. The results showed that a cultural difference did exist in the participants’ evaluations of the robot and their acceptance of the robot’s recommendations; the subjects preferred the robot to communicate in the interpersonal communication style familiar to them.

Chinese participants reported higher evaluations of robot likability, trust, and

References (36)

  • D. Briley et al.

    Cultural chameleons: Biculturals, conformity motives, and decision making

    Journal of Consumer Psychology

    (2005)
  • J.E. Swan et al.

    How industrial salespeople gain customer trust

    Industrial Marketing Management

    (1985)
  • K. Andersen et al.

    A summary of experimental research in ethos

    Speech Monographs

    (1963)
  • B. Barber

    The logic and limits of trust

    (1983)
  • M. Boisot et al.

    The iron law of fiefs: Bureaucratic failure and the problem of governance in the Chinese economic reforms

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (1988)
  • B.M. Muir

    Trust in automation: Part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems

    Ergonomics

    (1994)
  • G. Chierchia et al.

    Meaning and grammar

    (1990)
  • C.Y. Chiu et al.

    Cultural competence: Dynamic processes

  • P.M. Doney et al.

    An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–seller relationships

    Journal of Marketing

    (1997)
  • J.R. Dunn et al.

    Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2005)
  • Franklyn, H. (1948). An experimental study of the effects of ethos in public speaking. Diss. Northwestern...
  • P. Grice

    Studies in the way of words

    (1989)
  • E.T. Hall

    Understanding cultural differences

    (1990)
  • J.M. Hawes et al.

    Trust earning perceptions of sellers and buyers

    Journal of Personal Selling Sales Manage

    (1989)
  • G. Hofstede

    Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations

    (2001)
  • C. Hovland et al.

    The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness

    Public Opinion Quarterly

    (1951)
  • B.D. Janelle et al.

    Need for approval in low-context and high-context cultures: A communications approach to cross-cultural ethics

    Teaching Business Ethics

    (1998)
  • C.D. Kidd

    Sociable robots: The role of presence and task in human–robot interaction

    (2003)
  • Cited by (160)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text