Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic by children

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two studies are discussed in which children's use of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic was considered. Study one is a modification of the classic multiplication task devised by Kahneman and Tversky (1974). Results indicate that children in grades 4, 6, 8 and adults are affected by the order of numbers provided in an addition task. In addition, younger children display the tendency to over adjust, yielding higher estimates. In the second study, third and fifth grade participants and adults were provided anchors and estimated the number of jellybeans in a glass container. A main effect for condition is indicated, with lower anchors leading to lower estimates. Results of both studies are consistent with the an anchoring and adjustment explanation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnoli, F. (1991). Development of judgmental heuristics and logical reasoning: Training counteracts the representativeness heuristic. Cognitive Development, 6, 95–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1995). The representativeness heuristic and the conjunction fallacy effect in children's decision making. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 41 (3), 328–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. and White, P.A. (1994). Use of availability heuristic by children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 503–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J.E. and Potenza, M. (1991). The use of judgment heuristics to make social and object decisions: A developmental perspective. Child Development, 62, 166–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L. (1981). The intuitive scientist formulation. In Flavell, J. and Ross, L. (Eds.) Social Cognitive Development: Frontiers and Possible Futures. 1–42, New York, NY, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, R.W. (1983) Decision Making Under Uncertainty. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H.D. (1995). Judgmental heuristic use among children: A preliminary investigation. Paper presented as part of a symposium entitled “Children's use of heuristics and intuitive reasoning: What develops?” (Organized by Janis Jacobs) at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, March, Indianapolis, IN.

  • Tabachnik, B. and Fidel, L. (1989), Using Multivariate Statistics. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Middlebury College, 05753, Middlebury, VT

    H. David Smith

Authors
  1. H. David Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. David Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, H.D. Use of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic by children. Curr Psychol 18, 294–300 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-999-1004-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-999-1004-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation