The Prehistory of Protolanguage’s Notion. Condillac, Rousseau, De Brosses and the Origins of Language in the Eighteenth Century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/ths.2016.003Keywords
preadamism, language action, linguistic naturalism, primitive language, materialism, language matter, materialist tradition, onomatopoeiaAbstract
The famous prohibition of the Société de Linguistique de Paris, issued on March 8th, 1866, which forbade its members to submit research papers about the origin of language, reflected the mood of a precise historical and cultural situation. It was an affirmation of victory achieved by linguistic idealism and German historicis, formalized through an “edict” against the French naturalist-materialist tradition (or a European tradition tradition in general: for instance, in Italy, represented by Giambattista Vico). It was a victory against the philosophy of the Enlightenment, linked to the French Revolution. It was a political and ideological choice and an reflection of the intellectual climate of the Second Restoration, after 1848.
In fact, many various and interesting proposals were made in the eighteenth century by the Enlightenment thinkers on the subject of the origin of language. The approaches were empiricist and, at the time, they were meant to counter the theological clichés about the “divine” origins of the primordial language. This theological and metaphysical thesis was opposed by the Enlightenment with a naturalistic explanation. Therefore, those events mark the real prehistory of the protolanguage thesis, concerning human nature, being linked to natural modes of life of the “first men” and primitive humanity.
Our paper aims to investigate some of the most original philosophical versions concerning the prehistory of the notion of a protolanguage[1], echoing the views of our contemporary “gesturalists” (Condillac) and “vocalists” (Rousseau) or “verbalists” (De Brosses).
[1] I apologize that I will not adopt the notion of protolanguage in its technical sense, but rather in a historical and descriptive sense.
References
Almond, Ph. C. (1999). Adam and Eve in Seventeenth-Century Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Althusser, L. (1993). L’Unique Tradition Matérialiste. Lignes, n° 18, 72–119. Paris : Éditions Hazan.
Auroux, S. (1979). La sémiotique des encyclopédistes. Paris: Payot.
Condillac, E.-B. de (2001). Essay on the Origin of Human Knowledge. Ed. by H. Aarsleff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, A. (2001). The Mimetic Hypothesis and Embodied Musical Meaning. Musicae Scientiae Fall, vol.5, 2, 195–212.
De Brosses, Ch., le Président (1765). Traité de la formation mécanique des langues et des principes physiques de l’étymologie. 2 vol. Paris: Saillant Vincent et Desaint.
De Palo, M. (2005). De Brosses e Leibniz : un modello di naturalismo linguistico. In S. Gensini (Ed.), Linguaggio, mente e conoscenza. Intorno a Leibniz (pp. 87–120). Rome: Carocci.
De Saussure, F. (1997). Cours de linguistique générale. Publié par Ch. Bailly et A. Séchehaye, avec la collaboration de A. Riedlinger, éd. critique préparée par T. de Mauro, Postface de L.-J. Calvet. Paris : Payot.
Ferretti, F. (1997). Le immagini mentali nelle scienze cognitive. Rome: Carocci.
Ferreti, F. (2010). Alle origine del linguaggio umano. Il punto di vista evoluzionistico. Rome-Bari : Laterza, 2010. French edition (2015): Aux origines du langage humain. Le point de vue évolutionniste, translated by. P. Quintili & M. Tascherio. Paris : L’Harmattan.
Greimas, A. J. (1966). Sémantique Structurale. Recherche de méthode. Paris : Larousse.
Granger, G. G. (1954). Langue universelle et formalisation des sciences. Un fragment inédit de Condorcet, Revue d'histoire des sciences et de leurs applications, vol 7(3), 197–219 [http://www.persee.fr/doc/rhs_0048-7996_1954_num_7_3_3437].
Masataka, N. (2008). The Gestural Theory and the Vocal Theory of Language Origins are not Incompatible with one another. In N. Masataka (Ed.), The Origins of Language, 1–10. New York : Springer.
Nobile, L. (2007a). De Brosses, Jakobson et l’ontogenèse phonologique. Histoire Epistémologie Langage, 29/I, 105–114.
Nobile, L. (2007b). De Brosses e Cesarotti. Origine delle lingue e origini della linguistica nell’età della rivoluzione politica. In V. Della Valle & P. Trifone (Eds.), Studi linguistici per Luca Serianni , 507–521. Rome: Salerno.
Nobile, L. (2012). La Grammaire de Condillac face au paradoxe de l’origine naturelle du langage. In B. Colombat, J.-M. Fournier, V. Raby (Eds.), Vers une histoire générale de la grammaire française (pp. 151–168). Paris : Honoré Champion.
Nobile, L., Lombardi Vallauri, E. (2016). Onomatopea e fonosimbolismo. Rome: Carocci.
Pellegrino, R. (2013). Viaggio, scrittura e senso nell’opera di Charles De Brosses. Napoli : ESI.
Quintili, P. (2001). La pensée critique de Diderot. Matérialisme, science et poésie à l’âge de l’Encyclopédie. 1742–1782. Paris : Honoré Champion.
Quintili, P. (2009). Matérialismes et Lumières. Philosophies de la vie, autour de Diderot et de quelques autres. 1706–1789. Paris : Honoré Champion.
Rousseau, J.-J. (1997). Essai sur l’origine des langues. Fac-simile du manuscrit de Neuchâtel. Introduction de J. Starobinski et notice historique de F. S. Eigeldinger. Paris : Honoré Champion.
Rousseau, J.-J. (2000). Essay on the Origin of languages. In J.-J. Rousseau, The Collected Writings of Rousseau. Vol. 7. Ed. by J. T. Scott. Hanover and London: University Press of New England.
Rousseau, J.-J. (2012). Essai sur l’origine des langues, où il est parlé de la mélodie et de l’imitation musicale. In J.-J. Rousseau, Œuvres complètes. Vol. XII. Paris : Honoré Champion.
Vaneechoutte, M., Skoyles, J.R. (1998). The memetic origin of language: modern humans as musical primates. Journal of Memetics – Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, 2, http://cfpm.org/jom-emit/1998/vol2/vaneechoutte_m&skoyles_jr.html.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 772
Number of citations: 0