Spinal Cord StimulationBurst Spinal Cord Stimulation Evaluated in Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome and Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
Section snippets
INTRODUCTION
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an invasive technique that administers electrical stimulation to the dorsal columns of the spinal cord to reduce pain perception. SCS has shown to be an effective treatment for various neuropathic pain conditions (1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7.).
To achieve the most beneficial pain relief for an individual patient, SCS parameters like the configuration of active electrodes, the stimulation frequency, pulse width, and pulse amplitude can be adjusted to the patient’s
METHODS
Patients with an Eon IPG (St. Jude Medical) and using tonic SCS for at least six months tested burst stimulation for two weeks. Three groups of patients were included: two groups of patients who participated in previous studies—that is, patients with painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) and patients with low back and leg pain (failed back surgery syndrome [FBSS] (14)), and one group of patients with low back and leg pain (FBSS) who over time had started to experience insufficient effect of tonic
Study Population
Forty-eight patients from Medisch Spectrum Twente Hospital with an SCS system and tonic stimulation participated in the study. Their average age was 56 years (SD = 9; range: 29–80 years) and they had on average been experiencing pain for 10 years (SD = 6; range: 2–30 years). All patients had been using tonic stimulation for at least six months (mean = 2.5 years, SD = 2.6, range: 0.5–18 years) and evaluated burst stimulation for a two-week period.
Three different groups of patients were included:
DISCUSSION
Burst stimulation caused pain reduction in almost all patients. On average, burst stimulation caused a significantly larger pain reduction in all three patient groups than tonic stimulation, and burst stimulation caused little or no paresthesia in most patients. About 60% of patients (67% for PDN, 58% for FBSS, and 50% for the PR group) experienced further pain reduction when applying burst stimulation in comparison with tonic stimulation. An increase in perceived pain as compared with tonic
CONCLUSION
Burst stimulation compares favorably with tonic stimulation for most patients, generally without eliciting paresthesia. On average, burst stimulation causes significantly more pain reduction in patients with PDN and in patients with FBSS. A trial period of at least two weeks of burst stimulation for every patient with a spinal cord stimulator would likely increase the efficacy of SCS therapy. Still, further research should elucidate optimal burst stimulation parameters for patients who are
Authorship Statements
Ms. de Vos, Ms. Bom, and Drs. Vanneste, Lenders, and de Ridder designed the study. Ms. de Vos, Ms. Bom, and Dr. Lenders conducted the study, including patient recruitment and data collection. Ms. de Vos, Ms. Bom and, Dr. Vanneste performed data analysis. Ms. de Vos prepared the manuscript draft with important intellectual input from Ms. Bom, and Drs. Vanneste, Lenders, and de Ridder. All authors approved the final manuscript.
REFERENCES (17)
- et al.
Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation as adjuvant therapy for intractable angina pectoris: a prospective, randomized clinical study
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1994) - et al.
Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain in peripheral neuropathy
Surg Neurol
(1996) - et al.
Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome
Pain
(2007) - et al.
Electrical spinal cord stimulation in painful diabetic polyneuropathy, a systematic review on treatment efficacy and safety
Eur J Pain
(2011) - et al.
Effect and safety of spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain caused by diabetic neuropathy
J Diabetes Complications
(2009) - et al.
Ectopic sensory discharges and paresthesiae in patients with disorders of peripheral nerves, dorsal roots and dorsal columns
Pain
(1984) - et al.
Spinal cord stimulation with hybrid lead relieves pain in low back and legs
Neuromodulation
(2012) - et al.
Spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic reflex sympathetic dystrophy
N Engl J Med
(2000)
Cited by (0)
For more information on author guidelines, an explanation of our peer review process, and conflict of interest informed consent policies, please go to http://www.wiley.com/bw/submit.asp?ref=1094-7159&site=1