Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The virophage as a unique parasite of the giant mimivirus

Abstract

Viruses are obligate parasites of Eukarya, Archaea and Bacteria. Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus (APMV) is the largest known virus; it grows only in amoeba and is visible under the optical microscope. Mimivirus possesses a 1,185-kilobase double-stranded linear chromosome whose coding capacity is greater than that of numerous bacteria and archaea1,2,3. Here we describe an icosahedral small virus, Sputnik, 50 nm in size, found associated with a new strain of APMV. Sputnik cannot multiply in Acanthamoeba castellanii but grows rapidly, after an eclipse phase, in the giant virus factory found in amoebae co-infected with APMV4. Sputnik growth is deleterious to APMV and results in the production of abortive forms and abnormal capsid assembly of the host virus. The Sputnik genome is an 18.343-kilobase circular double-stranded DNA and contains genes that are linked to viruses infecting each of the three domains of life Eukarya, Archaea and Bacteria. Of the 21 predicted protein-coding genes, eight encode proteins with detectable homologues, including three proteins apparently derived from APMV, a homologue of an archaeal virus integrase, a predicted primase–helicase, a packaging ATPase with homologues in bacteriophages and eukaryotic viruses, a distant homologue of bacterial insertion sequence transposase DNA-binding subunit, and a Zn-ribbon protein. The closest homologues of the last four of these proteins were detected in the Global Ocean Survey environmental data set5, suggesting that Sputnik represents a currently unknown family of viruses. Considering its functional analogy with bacteriophages, we classify this virus as a virophage. The virophage could be a vehicle mediating lateral gene transfer between giant viruses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Different morphological aspects of mamavirus and Sputnik.
Figure 2: Sputnik propagation in mamavirus-infected amoebae.
Figure 3: The Sputnik chromosome.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ

Data deposits

The virophage genome has been deposited in GenBank under accession number EU606015. The Acanthamoeba castellanii mamavirus genes with homologues found in the Sputnik genome have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers EU827539, EU827540 and EU827541.

References

  1. Raoult, D. et al. The 1.2-megabase genome sequence of Mimivirus. Science 306, 1344–1350 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. La Scola, B. et al. A giant virus in amoebae. Science 299, 2033 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Koonin, E. V. Virology: Gulliver among the Lilliputians. Curr. Biol. 15, R167–R169 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Suzan-Monti, M., La Scola, B., Barrassi, L., Espinosa, L. & Raoult, D. Ultrastructural characterization of the giant volcano-like virus factory of Acanthamoeba polyphaga Mimivirus . PLoS ONE 2, e328 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rusch, D. B. et al. The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling expedition: northwest Atlantic through eastern tropical Pacific. PLoS Biol. 5, e77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Raoult, D. & Forterre, P. Redefining viruses: lessons from Mimivirus. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 6, 315–319 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rasmussen, M., Jacobsson, M. & Bjorck, L. Genome-based identification and analysis of collagen-related structural motifs in bacterial and viral proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 32313–32316 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Williamson, S. J. et al. The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling Expedition: metagenomic characterization of viruses within aquatic microbial samples. PLoS ONE 3, e1456 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Iyer, L. M., Makarova, K. S., Koonin, E. V. & Aravind, L. Comparative genomics of the FtsK–HerA superfamily of pumping ATPases: implications for the origins of chromosome segregation, cell division and viral capsid packaging. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 5260–5279 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. De Silva, F. S. & Moss, B. Origin-independent plasmid replication occurs in vaccinia virus cytoplasmic factories and requires all five known poxvirus replication factors. Virol. J. 2 10.1186/1743-422X-2-23 (2005)

  11. Oliveira, S. & Costa, J. V. Replication of transfected plasmid DNA by cells infected with African swine fever virus. Virology 207, 392–399 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Filee, J., Siguier, P. & Chandler, M. I am what I eat and I eat what I am: acquisition of bacterial genes by giant viruses. Trends Genet. 23, 10–15 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moreira, D. & Brochier-Armanet, C. Giant viruses, giant chimeras: the multiple evolutionary histories of Mimivirus genes. BMC Evol. Biol. 8 10.1186/1471-2148-8-12 (2008)

  14. Koonin, E. V., Senkevich, T. G. & Dolja, V. V. The ancient Virus World and evolution of cells. Biol. Direct 1 10.1186/1745-6150-1-29 (2006)

  15. Fauquet, C. M., Mayo, M. A., Maniloff, J., Desselberger, U., Ball, L. A. (eds) Virus Taxonomy (Eighth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses) 1163–1169 (Elsevier, London, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. La Scola, B., Barrassi, L. & Raoult, D. Isolation of new fastidious α-Proteobacteria and Afipia felis from hospital water supplies by direct plating and amoebal co-culture procedures. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 34, 129–137 (2000)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Margulies, M. et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437, 376–380 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lukashin, A. V. & Borodovsky, M. GeneMark.hmm: new solutions for gene finding. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 1107–1115 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K. & Miyata, T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3059–3066 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M. & Kumar, S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1596–1599 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jobb, G., von Haeseler, A. & Strimmer, K. TREEFINDER: a powerful graphical analysis environment for molecular phylogenetics. BMC Evol. Biol. 4 10.1186/1471-2148-4-18 (2004)

  23. Kowalczewska, M. & Raoult, D. Advances in Tropheryma whipplei research: the rush to find biomarkers for Whipple’s disease. Future Microbiol. 2, 631–642 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Altschul, S. F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Finn, R. D. et al. Pfam: clans, web tools and services. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D247–D251 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Letunic, I. et al. SMART 4.0: towards genomic data integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D142–D144 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ghai, R., Hain, T. & Chakraborty, T. GenomeViz: visualizing microbial genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 5 10.1186/1471-2105-5-198 (2004)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank X. de Lamballerie, S. Azza, P. de Clocquement, L. Espinosa, B. Campagna, N. Aldrovandi, V. Brice, A. Bernard, C. Ivars, B. Giumelli and Y. Wolf for expert assistance. This work was funded by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS, crédits récurrents). I.P. is funded by a CIFFRE fellowship, E.K. is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Library of Medicine, and P.F. is funded by the Institut Universitaire de France.

Author contributions D.R. and B.L.S. supervised the project and wrote the manuscript. C.D., P.F. and E.K. contributed to sequence analysis, interpretation of the results and writing of the manuscript. I.P. isolated the virus. M.S.-M. contributed to viral cycle analysis, interpretation of the results and writing of the manuscript. M.M. provided water samples. L.B. conducted the viral cycle experiment. C.R. and G.F. sequenced the genome.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Didier Raoult.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information 1

The file contains Supplementary Figures 1 -13, Supplementary Tables 1 - 4, Supplementary Methods, and Supplementary Results along with additional references. (PDF 708 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

La Scola, B., Desnues, C., Pagnier, I. et al. The virophage as a unique parasite of the giant mimivirus. Nature 455, 100–104 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07218

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07218

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing