Abstract
This study provides an in-depth analysis of children's use of a taught mental calculation strategy. Three children (aged eight to nine years) who demonstrated contrasting spontaneous calculation approaches, were interviewed following the direct instruction of a calculation strategy. Their responses are explored in relation to constructivist and participation perspectives of learning. In response to a unified view of these theories, hypotheses are generated that ask fundamental questions related to the did actics of mental calculation strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Askew, M., Bibby, T. and Brown, M.: 1997, Raising Attainment in Primary Numeracy, King's College, London.
Beishuizen, M. and Anghileri, J.: 1998, ‘Which mental strategies in the early number curriculum? A comparison of British ideas and Dutch views’, British Educational Research Journal 24(5), 519–538.
Brown, M., Askew, M., Baker, D., Denvir, H. and Millett, A.: 1998, ‘Is the National Numeracy Strategy research-based?’, British Journal of Educational Studies 46(4), 362–385.
Burton, L.: 1999, ‘The implications of a narrative approach to the learning of mathematics’, in L. Burton, (ed. ), Learning Mathematics: From Hierarchies to Networks, Falmer Press, London, pp. 22–33.
Carpenter, T. and Moser, J.: 1984, ‘The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 15(3), 179–202.
Cockcroft, W. H.: 1982, Mathematics Counts, HMSO, London.
DES: 1989, Mathematics: The Non-Statutory Guidancs, The National Curriculum Council, London.
DES: 1991, Mathematics in the National Curriculum, HMSO, London.
DfE: 1995, Key Stages 1 and 2 of the National Curriculum, HMSO, London.
DfEE: 1998, The Implementation of the National Numeracy Strategy, DfEE, London.
DfEE: 1999a, The National Numeracy Framework for Teaching Mathematics from Reception to Year 6, DfEE, London.
DfEE: 1999b, The National Numeracy Strategy: Guide for your Professional Development; Book 4, DfEE, London.
Denvir, B. and Brown, M.: 1986, ‘Understanding of number concepts in low attaining 7–9 year olds: Part II. The teaching studies’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 17, 143–164.
Earl, L., Fullan, M., Leithwood, K. and Watson, N.: 2000, Watching and Learning,Summary: First Annual Report, OISE/UT, Toronto.
Earl, L., Watson, N., Levin, B., Leithwood, K., Fullan, M. and Torrance, N.: 2003, Watching and Learning 3: Final Report of the External Evaluation of England's National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies, OISE/UT, Toronto.
Ebutt, S.: 1990, Mathematics in Primary Schools,Part 1: Children and Mathematics, HBJ Ltd., London.
Foxman, D. and Beishuizen, M.: 1999, ‘Untaught mental calculation methods used by 11-year-olds’, Mathematics in School 28(5), 5–7.
Fraivillig, J., Murphy, L. and Fuson, K.: 1999, ‘Advancing children's mathematical thinking in everyday mathematics classrooms’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 30(2), 148–170.
Fuson, K., Wearne, D., Hiebert, J., Murray, H., Human, P., Olivier, A., Carpenter, T. and Fennema, E.: 1999, ‘Children's conceptual structures for multidigit addition and subtraction’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28(2), 163–186.
Goos, M., Galbraith, P. and Renshaw, P.: 1999, ‘Establishing a community of practice in a secondary mathematics classroom' in L. Burton (ed. ), Learning Mathematics: From Hierarchies to Networks, Falmer Press, London, pp. 51–74.
Gray, E.: 1991, ‘An analysis of diverging approaches to simple arithmetic: Preference and its consequences’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, 551–574.
Gray, E.: 1997, ‘Developing a flexible interpretation of symbols’, in I. Thompson (ed. ), Teaching and Learning Early Number, Open University Press, Great Britain, pp. 63–72.
Kamii, C.: 1985, Young Children Reinvent Arithmetic: Implications of Piaget's Theory, Teachers College Press, New York.
Lave, J.: 1988, Cognition in Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E.: 1991, Situated Learning-Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, USA.
Plunkett, S.: 1979, ‘Decomposition and all that rot’, Mathematics in School 8(3), 2–7.
SCAA: 1997, The Teaching and Assessment of Number at Key Stage 1–3: Discussion Paper no.10, SCAA, London.
Sfard, A.: 1998, ‘On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one’, Educational Researcher 27(2), 4–13.
Smith, C.: 1999, ‘Pencil and paper numeracy’, Mathematics in School 28(4), 10–13.
Steffe, L.: 1983, ‘Children's algorithms as schemes’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 14, 109–125.
Steinberg, R.: 1985, ‘Instruction on derived facts strategies in addition and subtraction’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 16(5), 337–355.
Thompson, I.: 1999, ‘Mental calculation strategies for addition and subtraction: Part 1’, Mathematics in School 28(5), 2–4.
Thompson, I.: 2000, ‘Mental calculation strategies for addition and subtraction: Part 2’, Mathematics in School 29(1), 24–26.
Tripp, D.: 1993, Critical Incidents in Teaching, Routledge/Falmer, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murphy, C. How Do Children Come to Use a Taught Mental Calculation Strategy?. Educational Studies in Mathematics 56, 3–18 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000028403.25781.79
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000028403.25781.79