Skip to main content
Log in

How Do Children Come to Use a Taught Mental Calculation Strategy?

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study provides an in-depth analysis of children's use of a taught mental calculation strategy. Three children (aged eight to nine years) who demonstrated contrasting spontaneous calculation approaches, were interviewed following the direct instruction of a calculation strategy. Their responses are explored in relation to constructivist and participation perspectives of learning. In response to a unified view of these theories, hypotheses are generated that ask fundamental questions related to the did actics of mental calculation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Askew, M., Bibby, T. and Brown, M.: 1997, Raising Attainment in Primary Numeracy, King's College, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beishuizen, M. and Anghileri, J.: 1998, ‘Which mental strategies in the early number curriculum? A comparison of British ideas and Dutch views’, British Educational Research Journal 24(5), 519–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., Askew, M., Baker, D., Denvir, H. and Millett, A.: 1998, ‘Is the National Numeracy Strategy research-based?’, British Journal of Educational Studies 46(4), 362–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, L.: 1999, ‘The implications of a narrative approach to the learning of mathematics’, in L. Burton, (ed. ), Learning Mathematics: From Hierarchies to Networks, Falmer Press, London, pp. 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. and Moser, J.: 1984, ‘The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 15(3), 179–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockcroft, W. H.: 1982, Mathematics Counts, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • DES: 1989, Mathematics: The Non-Statutory Guidancs, The National Curriculum Council, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • DES: 1991, Mathematics in the National Curriculum, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfE: 1995, Key Stages 1 and 2 of the National Curriculum, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfEE: 1998, The Implementation of the National Numeracy Strategy, DfEE, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfEE: 1999a, The National Numeracy Framework for Teaching Mathematics from Reception to Year 6, DfEE, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfEE: 1999b, The National Numeracy Strategy: Guide for your Professional Development; Book 4, DfEE, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denvir, B. and Brown, M.: 1986, ‘Understanding of number concepts in low attaining 7–9 year olds: Part II. The teaching studies’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 17, 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, L., Fullan, M., Leithwood, K. and Watson, N.: 2000, Watching and Learning,Summary: First Annual Report, OISE/UT, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, L., Watson, N., Levin, B., Leithwood, K., Fullan, M. and Torrance, N.: 2003, Watching and Learning 3: Final Report of the External Evaluation of England's National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies, OISE/UT, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebutt, S.: 1990, Mathematics in Primary Schools,Part 1: Children and Mathematics, HBJ Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxman, D. and Beishuizen, M.: 1999, ‘Untaught mental calculation methods used by 11-year-olds’, Mathematics in School 28(5), 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraivillig, J., Murphy, L. and Fuson, K.: 1999, ‘Advancing children's mathematical thinking in everyday mathematics classrooms’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 30(2), 148–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuson, K., Wearne, D., Hiebert, J., Murray, H., Human, P., Olivier, A., Carpenter, T. and Fennema, E.: 1999, ‘Children's conceptual structures for multidigit addition and subtraction’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28(2), 163–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goos, M., Galbraith, P. and Renshaw, P.: 1999, ‘Establishing a community of practice in a secondary mathematics classroom' in L. Burton (ed. ), Learning Mathematics: From Hierarchies to Networks, Falmer Press, London, pp. 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E.: 1991, ‘An analysis of diverging approaches to simple arithmetic: Preference and its consequences’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, 551–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E.: 1997, ‘Developing a flexible interpretation of symbols’, in I. Thompson (ed. ), Teaching and Learning Early Number, Open University Press, Great Britain, pp. 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamii, C.: 1985, Young Children Reinvent Arithmetic: Implications of Piaget's Theory, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J.: 1988, Cognition in Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Lave, J. and Wenger, E.: 1991, Situated Learning-Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plunkett, S.: 1979, ‘Decomposition and all that rot’, Mathematics in School 8(3), 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCAA: 1997, The Teaching and Assessment of Number at Key Stage 1–3: Discussion Paper no.10, SCAA, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A.: 1998, ‘On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one’, Educational Researcher 27(2), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C.: 1999, ‘Pencil and paper numeracy’, Mathematics in School 28(4), 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffe, L.: 1983, ‘Children's algorithms as schemes’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 14, 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R.: 1985, ‘Instruction on derived facts strategies in addition and subtraction’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 16(5), 337–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, I.: 1999, ‘Mental calculation strategies for addition and subtraction: Part 1’, Mathematics in School 28(5), 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, I.: 2000, ‘Mental calculation strategies for addition and subtraction: Part 2’, Mathematics in School 29(1), 24–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, D.: 1993, Critical Incidents in Teaching, Routledge/Falmer, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy, C. How Do Children Come to Use a Taught Mental Calculation Strategy?. Educational Studies in Mathematics 56, 3–18 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000028403.25781.79

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000028403.25781.79

Navigation