Abstract
Climate change impact assessment is subject to a range of uncertainties due to both incomplete and unknowable knowledge. This paper presents an approach to quantifying some of these uncertainties within a probabilistic framework. A hierarchical impact model is developed that addresses uncertainty about future greenhouse gas emissions, the climate sensitivity, and limitations and unpredictability in general circulation models. The hierarchical model is used in Bayesian Monte-Carlo simulations to define posterior probability distributions for changes in seasonal-mean temperature and precipitation over the United Kingdom that are conditional on prior distributions for the model parameters. The application of this approach to an impact model is demonstrated using a hydrological example.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Hulme and T.C. Carter, in: Representing Uncertainty in Climate Change Scenarios and Impact Studies - ECLAT-2 Red Workshop Report, eds. T. Carter, M. Hulme and D. Viner (Climatic Research Unit, Norwich, 1999).
S.H. Schneider, W. Turner and H. Garriga-Morehouse, J. Risk. Res. 1 (1999) 165–185.
F. Giorgi and R. Francisco, Clim. Dyn. 16 (2000) 169–182.
J. Alcamo and N. Nakicenovic, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change (Special Issue) 3 (1998).
J. Leggett et al., in: Climate Change 1992: the Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, IPCC (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
R.N. Jones, Clim. Change (2000), in press.
W.L. Gates et al., Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 80 (1999) 29–55.
M. New, in: Representing Uncertainty in Climate Change Scenarios and Impact Studies - ECLAT-2 Red Workshop Report, eds. T. Carter, M. Hulme and D. Viner (Climatic Research Unit, Norwich, 1999).
T. Carter, M. Hulme and D. Viner, eds., Representing Uncertainty in Climate Change Scenarios and Impact Studies - ECLAT-2 Red Workshop Report (Climatic Research Unit, Norwich, 1999).
M.L. Parry and T. Carter, Climate Impact and Adaptation Assessment (Earthscan, London, 1998).
M. Hulme and O. Brown, Clim. Res. 10 (1998) 1–14.
R.W. Katz, in: Representing Uncertainty in Climate Change Scenarios and Impact Studies - ECLAT-2 Red Workshop Report, eds. T. Carter, M. Hulme and D. Viner (Climatic Research Unit, Norwich, 1999).
M.G. Morgan and M. Henrion, Uncertainty: a Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quamtitative Risk and Policy Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990).
R.N. Jones, Clim. Res. 14 (2000) 89–100.
N. Nakicenovic, A. Grubler and A. McDonald, eds., Special report on emissions scenarios, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000), in preparation.
SRES, The Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (1999) (http:// sres.ciesen.org).
T.M.L. Wigley and S.C.B. Raper, Nature 357 (1992) 293–300.
T.M.L. Wigley et al., MAGICC: Model for the Assessment of Greenhouse-Gas Induced Climate Change - Version 2.4 (Climatic Research Unit, Norwich, 2000).
W.L. Gates et al., in: Climate Change 1992: the IPCC Supplementary Report, IPCC (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
R.H. Moss and S.H. Schneider, Towards consistent assessment and reporting of uncertainties in IPCC TAR: initial recommendations for discussion by authors (1999), unpublished discussion document.
M.G. Morgan and D.W. Keith, Environmental Science and Technology 29 (1995) A468–A476.
R.S.J. Tol and A.F. De Vos, Clim. Change 38 (1998) 87–112.
R.E. Dickinson, Adv. Geophys. 28 (1985) 99–129.
IPCC-DDC, IPCC Data Distribution Centre GCM Scenario Download Website (1999) (http://ipcc-ddc.cru.uea.ac.uk/).
J.F.B. Mitchell et al., Clim. Change 41 (1999) 547–581.
B.D. Santer et al., Developing climate scenarios from equilibrium GCM results, report No. 218, Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg (1990).
M.E. Schlesinger et al., Technological Forecasting and Social Change (2000), in press.
S.H. Schneider and S.L. Thompson, J. Geophys. Res. 86 (1981) 3135–3147.
S.F.B. Tett, T.C. Johns and J.F.B. Mitchell, Clim. Dyn. 13 (1997) 303–323.
J.F.B. Mitchell et al., in: Climate Change: the IPCC Scientific Assessment, IPCC (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990).
C. Green, R.J. Nicholls and C. Johnson, Climate Change Adaptation: an Analysis of Decision-Making in the Face of Risk and Uncertainty, report No. 28, NCRAOA (Environment Agency, 2000).
K. Beven and A. Binley, Hydrol. Proc. 6 (1992) 279–298.
J. Freer, K. Beven and B. Ambroise, Water Resour. Res. 32 (1996) 2161–2173.
S. Rahmstorf and A. Ganopolski, J. Climate 12 (1999) 1349–1352.
S. Emori et al., J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. (2000), submitted.
G.J. Boer et al., Clim. Dyn. (2000), submitted.
A.C. Hirst, S.P. Ofarrell and H.B. Gordon, J. Climate 13 (2000) 139–163.
E. Roeckner et al., The Atmospheric General Circulation Model ECHAM-4: Model Description and Simulation of Present-Day Climate, report No. 218, Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg (1996).
J.M. Haywood et al., Geophys. Res. Lett. 24 (1997) 1335–1338.
J.F.B. Mitchell and T.C. Johns, J. Climate 10 (1997) 245–267.
G.A. Meehl et al., J. Climate (2000), submitted.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
New, M., Hulme, M. Representing uncertainty in climate change scenarios: a Monte-Carlo approach. Integrated Assessment 1, 203–213 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019144202120
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019144202120