Cambridge Journals Online

Cambridge Journals Online
Skip to content
Journal of Child Language (2007), 34: 1-20 Cambridge University Press
Copyright © 2007 Cambridge University Press
doi:10.1017/S0305000906007689
Published online by Cambridge University Press 25 Jan 2007


Reference and attitude in infant pointing 1


ULF LISZKOWSKI a1c1, MALINDA CARPENTER a1 and MICHAEL TOMASELLO a1
a1 Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Leipzig, Germany

Article author query
liszkowski u   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
carpenter m   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
tomasello m   [PubMed] [Google Scholar

Abstract

We investigated two main components of infant declarative pointing, reference and attitude, in two experiments with a total of 106 preverbal infants at 1;0. When an experimenter (E) responded to the declarative pointing of these infants by attending to an incorrect referent (with positive attitude), infants repeated pointing within trials to redirect E’s attention, showing an understanding of E’s reference and active message repair. In contrast, when E identified infants’ referent correctly but displayed a disinterested attitude, infants did not repeat pointing within trials and pointed overall in fewer trials, showing an understanding of E’s unenthusiastic attitude about the referent. When E attended to infants’ intended referent AND shared interest in it, infants were most satisfied, showing no message repair within trials and pointing overall in more trials. These results suggest that by twelve months of age infant declarative pointing is a full communicative act aimed at sharing with others both attention to a referent and a specific attitude about that referent.

(Published Online January 25 2007)
(Received March 24 2005)
(Revised July 6 2006)


Correspondence:
c1 Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany. e-mail: liszkowski@eva.mpg.de


Footnotes

1 Thanks to Konstanze Albrecht for coding and helping with the data collection and to anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on a previous version.



back to top
Cambridge University Press