Cambridge Journals Online

Cambridge Journals Online
Skip to content
Journal of Biosocial Science (2007), 39: 59-78 Cambridge University Press
Copyright © 2005 Cambridge University Press
doi:10.1017/S0021932005001161
Published online by Cambridge University Press 07 Dec 2005


Regular Articles

SPATIAL CORRELATES OF US HEIGHTS AND BODY MASS INDEXES, 2002


JOHN  KOMLOS  a1 and BENJAMIN E.  LAUDERDALE  a2
a1 Department of Economics, University of Munich, Germany
a2 Department of Politics, Princeton University, USA

Article author query
komlos j   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
lauderdale be   [PubMed] [Google Scholar

Abstract

Aiming to further explore possible underlying causes of the recent remarkable stagnation and relative decline in American heights, this paper describes the result of analysis of the commercial US Sizing Survey (2002). Heights are correlated positively with income and education among both white males and females while Body Mass Index (BMI) is correlated negatively among females, as in other samples. In contrast to much of the literature, this paper considers geographic correlates of height such as local poverty rate, median income and population density at the zip code level of resolution. After adjusting for confounding factors that influence height such as income and education, population density is found to be strongly and negatively correlated with height among white men, but less so among white women. The effect on BMIs less convincing. Other ethnic groups are not analysed in detail because of the small number of observations available. Local economic conditions as measured by median income, unemployment and poverty rate do not have a strong correlation with height or BMI after adjusting for individual income and education.

(Published Online December 7 2005)



back to top
Cambridge University Press