Review
Mouse models of implantation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2007.06.002Get rights and content

The process of implantation, necessary for nearly all viviparous birth, consists of tightly regulated reactions including apposition of the blastocyst, attachment to the uterine epithelium and decidualization of the uterine stroma. In order for implantation to be successful, a reciprocal interaction between an implantation competent blastocyst and receptive uterus must be achieved. A more thorough understanding of the molecular mechanisms that regulate uterine receptivity and implantation is of clinical relevance to correct implantation failure and improve pregnancy rates. As molecular methodologies have evolved in recent times, the use of in vivo models to elucidate the molecular mechanisms involved in implantation has increased. The mouse has emerged as a powerful model to investigate implantation owing to the ability to control uterine physiology through exogenous stimuli, and more recently, the ability to manipulate gene expression. This review describes the evolution of the mouse as a model for understanding uterine implantation, including exciting new advances in this field, and describes a novel genetic pathway that can be elucidated from these models.

Introduction

Human infertility is a global problem with social and economic impact. According to the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 10% of women in the United States have had an infertility-related medical visit, and an additional 7% of married couples of reproductive age have difficulty conceiving [1]. Although great strides have been made in assisted reproductive technology, especially in in vitro fertilization and embryo manipulation, the goal of successful implantation remains elusive. A great number of these failures are probably caused by the transfer of embryos into a nonreceptive uterus. Therefore, the elucidation of the complex progression of molecular and physiological events that comprise implantation is of utmost importance. This review focuses on how mouse models have facilitated our understanding of uterine implantation and preimplantation uterine events that render the uterus receptive to the blastocyst. Revisiting this field is timely owing to the recent developments in our ability to conditionally ablate genes in the mouse uterus.

Implantation has long been known to be a steroid hormone dependent process. Coordinated action of both estrogen (E2) and progesterone (P4) are necessary for the preparation and process of implantation into the mouse endometrium. During normal mouse pregnancy, an E2 surge on day (d)1 (d1 = vaginal plug) stimulates uterine epithelial cell proliferation. A decrease in E2 levels on d2 leads to apoptosis of a large number of epithelial cells. P4, from the newly formed corpora lutea on d3, initiates uterine stromal cell proliferation. In conjunction with the high P4, an acute E2 spike on d4 further stimulates uterine stromal proliferation and renders the uterus receptive for the blastocyst to implant (as reviewed in [2]). In mice, the process of implantation consists of apposition between the trophectoderm layer of the blastocyst with the luminal epithelium, attachment of these layers and, finally, invasion of the uterine luminal epithelium by the embryo. Upon embryo invasion, the uterine stromal cell is rapidly remodeled in the process of decidualization (as reviewed in [3]). Decidualization is characterized by morphological and functional changes in the uterine stromal cells in the form of endometrial stroma proliferation and differentiation into large epitheliod decidual cells. Decidualization is critical for establishment of a fetal–maternal interface during implantation and remains dependent upon continued P4. The mouse models discussed in this review have contributed to the physiological and molecular understanding of this process.

Section snippets

Early mouse models of uterine implantation

The early mouse models of implantation utilized surgical and/or exogenous hormone treatments to elucidate the physiological attributes necessary to initiate and sustain implantation. These models include delayed implantation, pseudopregnancy, an artificial induction of decidualization and tissue reconstitution experiments 4, 5, 6. Previous studies utilizing these models were instrumental in describing the physiological changes of the uterus during pregnancy, elucidating the function of the

Delayed implantation

Fertile mating at the postpartum estrus leads to a lactational delay of implantation. During delayed implantation, the uterus remains quiescent and the blastocysts become dormant [7]. A state similar to the lactational delay of implantation can be experimentally induced by ovariectomizing pregnant females on d4 of pregnancy before the preimplantation E2 surge. Continued P4 treatment can maintain the delayed implantation for several days, and a single administration of E2 can reinitiate the

Pseudopregnancy

When a female mouse is mated with a vasectomized, and therefore sterile, male mouse, the series of changes in the uterus parallel those during the first four days of pregnancy. However, the uterus does not proceed to the formation of a decidua (as reviewed in [4]). It was first noted that the pseudopregnant mouse uterus is capable of implantation and subsequent decidualization when tumor transplants into the uterus were invariably found implanted on the antimesometrial side of the uterus, most

Artificial induction of decidualization

Further studies (reviewed in [4]) on pseudopregnant mice demonstrate that other experimental stimuli can also elicit decidualization. Pioneering work on steroid hormone regulation of uterine physiology led Finn and Martin to develop an experimental model of decidualization widely utilized by researchers today 5, 11. This model of decidualization, utilizing ovariectomized mice treated with a regimen of exogenous steroid hormones and a decidual trauma, affords researchers the ability to study

Tissue reconstitution

Another mouse model that elucidated several important findings is the tissue reconstitution model. This model was created by enzymatically dissociating uterine epithelial cells and growing them in culture. The cultured epithelial cells were then grafted with fresh stromal cells under the renal capsule of intact female mice. This procedure leads to the reconstitution of tissue of normal histology [6]. Transplantation experiments utilizing this system were the first mouse models to demonstrate

Conventional knockout mouse models

Early mouse models demonstrated that implantation is critically dependent upon E2 and P4. The advent of gene targeting technology and the recent annotation of the mouse genome have led to the discovery of numerous molecules involved in uterine implantation (Table 1). Additionally, these models have demonstrated that steroid hormones act primarily through their cognate nuclear receptors, the estrogen receptor (Esr) and progesterone receptor (Pgr). Several isoforms of both Esr and Pgr are

Conditional mouse models

Although gene ablation studies have been instrumental in understanding uterine gene function, several genes implicated in implantation including Indian hedgehog (Ihh), bone morphogenetic protein 2 (Bmp2), vascular endothelial growth factor (Vegf), hypoxia induced factor 1 (Hif1), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) and Wingless-related MMTV integration site 4 (Wnt4) are lethal at early developmental stages owing to perturbation in vascular development, bone morphogenesis

Conclusions

Mouse models have contributed greatly to our understanding of the physiological and molecular events necessary for the process of implantation. Early mouse models were instrumental in elucidating the physiological changes associated with implantation. Additionally, these models have provided the experimental methodologies currently being utilized in conjunction with the genetic models to elucidate gene function. Although conventional genetic ablation technologies have yielded a wealth of

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Janet L. DeMayo, M.S. for assistance with manuscript preparation. This work was supported by NICHD/NIH as part of the Cooperative Program on Trophoblast-Maternal Tissue Interactions (U01 HD042311) and the Specialized Cooperative Center for Reproductive Research (U54 DK59820) (to F.J.D); the Reproductive Biology Training Grant (5 T32 HD07165) (to K.L.); R01-DK55636 to (S.Y.T); and RO1-CA77530 and the Susan G. Komen Award BCTR0503763 (to J.P.L.).

References (72)

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2002) National Survey of Family...
  • K.Y. Lee et al.

    Animal models of implantation

    Reproduction

    (2004)
  • A. McLaren

    Stimulus and response during early pregnancy in the mouse

    Nature

    (1969)
  • C.A. Finn et al.

    Endocrine control of the timing of endometrial sensitivity to a decidual stimulus

    Biol. Reprod.

    (1972)
  • P.S. Cooke

    Restoration of normal morphology and estrogen responsiveness in cultured vaginal and uterine epithelia transplanted with stroma

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1986)
  • A. McLaren

    A study of balstocysts during delay and subsequent implantation in lactating mice

    J. Endocrinol.

    (1968)
  • K. Yoshinaga et al.

    Delayed implantation in the spayed, progesterone treated adult mouse

    J. Reprod. Fertil.

    (1966)
  • I.B. Wilson

    Implantation of tissue transplants in the uteri of pseudopregnant mice

    Nature

    (1960)
  • A. Psychoyos

    Endocrine control of egg implantation

  • C.A. Finn et al.

    The role of the oestrogen secreted before oestrus in the preparation of the uterus for implantation in the mouse

    J. Endocrinol.

    (1970)
  • C.A. Finn

    Endocrine control of endometrial sensitivity during the induction of the decidual cell reaction in the mouse

    J. Endocrinol.

    (1966)
  • P.S. Cooke

    Stromal estrogen receptors mediate mitogenic effects of estradiol on uterine epithelium

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1997)
  • T. Kurita

    Stromal progesterone receptors mediate the inhibitory effects of progesterone on estrogen-induced uterine epithelial cell deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis

    Endocrinology

    (1998)
  • S.W. Curtis

    Disruption of estrogen signaling does not prevent progesterone action in the estrogen receptor alpha knockout mouse uterus

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1999)
  • J.H. Krege

    Generation and reproductive phenotypes of mice lacking estrogen receptor beta

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1998)
  • S.C. Hewitt

    Estrogen receptor-dependent genomic responses in the uterus mirror the biphasic physiological response to estrogen

    Mol. Endocrinol.

    (2003)
  • O. Wada-Hiraike

    Role of estrogen receptor beta in uterine stroma and epithelium: Insights from estrogen receptor beta −/− mice

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2006)
  • Z. Weihua

    Estrogen receptor (ER) beta, a modulator of ERalpha in the uterus

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2000)
  • S. Curtis Hewitt

    Studies using the estrogen receptor alpha knockout uterus demonstrate that implantation but not decidualization-associated signaling is estrogen dependent

    Biol. Reprod.

    (2002)
  • J.P. Lydon

    Mice lacking progesterone receptor exhibit pleiotropic reproductive abnormalities

    Genes Dev.

    (1995)
  • P. Kastner

    Two distinct estrogen-regulated promoters generate transcripts encoding the two functionally different human progesterone receptor forms A and B

    EMBO J.

    (1990)
  • B. Mulac-Jericevic

    Subgroup of reproductive functions of progesterone mediated by progesterone receptor-B isoform

    Science

    (2000)
  • B. Mulac-Jericevic

    Defective mammary gland morphogenesis in mice lacking the progesterone receptor B isoform

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2003)
  • C.L. Stewart

    Blastocyst implantation depends on maternal expression of leukaemia inhibitory factor

    Nature

    (1992)
  • M. Ernst

    Defective gp130-mediated signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling results in degenerative joint disease, gastrointestinal ulceration, and failure of uterine implantation

    J. Exp. Med.

    (2001)
  • J.R. Chen

    Leukemia inhibitory factor can substitute for nidatory estrogen and is essential to inducing a receptive uterus for implantation but is not essential for subsequent embryogenesis

    Endocrinology

    (2000)
  • Cited by (65)

    • Androgens and endometrium: New insights and new targets

      2018, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Progesterone plays a key role in stimulating stromal cells to decidualise acting via the progesterone receptor (PR). Decidualisation can be simulated in mice following priming with ovarian hormones and simulation of embryo implantation by directly stimulating the uterine epithelium (Ledford et al., 1976; Brasted et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2007; Cousins et al., 2014). A study using global PR knockout mice (targeted disruption of both PR-A and PR-B) demonstrated that they are unable to respond to an artificial decidualisation stimulus (Lydon et al., 1995), with human studies complementing animal model findings (Lessey et al., 1996; Labied et al., 2006) and confirming a fundamental role for PR in the regulation of decidualisation.

    • Estrogen-dependent expression of sine oculis homeobox 1 in the mouse uterus during the estrous cycle

      2016, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recent study demonstrated that the loss of Six1 caused abnormal development of organs and disease in fly and human [2]. The uterus is important organ for the propagation and provides the site for the fertilization of oocytes by spermatozoa, for implantation and subsequent development of the embryo, and for delivery of the fetus [15,16]. The uterus undergoes dramatic cyclic changes through regulation of ovarian steroids during reproductive cycle.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text