ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Volume 148, Issues 1-2, 5 September 2007, Pages 253-258
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (510 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
Special issue
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.02.012    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Biological denitrification of drinking water in a slow sand filter

Sukru AslanCorresponding Author Contact Information, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Hatice Cakicia

aCumhuriyet University, Department of Environmental Engineering, 58140 Sivas, Turkey

Received 24 July 2006; 
revised 8 February 2007; 
accepted 9 February 2007. 
Available online 14 February 2007.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Biological removal of nitrate from drinking water was studied in a slow sand filter. Optimum carbon to nitrogen ratio (C/N) was found to be 1.8 when using acetic acid in batch tests. The filtration rates impact on NO3–N removal through the sand filter was assessed for 22.6 mg NO3–N/l concentrations while keeping C/N ratio as 1.8 for acetic acid. The filtration rates varied from 0.015, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, 0.05, and 0.06 m/h, respectively, corresponding to an overall average NO3–N removal efficiency of 94%. Although increasing filtration rates decreased NO3–N removal, effluent NO3–N concentrations at the effluent port were lower than the limit value. The slow sand filter process was unable to provide NO3–N removal rate more than 27.1 g N/(m2 day) (0.05 m/h flow rate). The NO3–N removal efficiency slightly dropped from 99% to 94% when the loading rate increased from 27.1 to 32.5 g/(m2 day), but the effluent water contained higher concentration of NO2–N than the standard value.

Keywords: Biodenitrification; Slow sand filtration; Drinking water

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Experimental set-up of the biological sand filter
2.2. Batch experiments
2.3. Influent synthetic medium composition
2.4. Analytical methods
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Determination of optimum C/N ratio in the batch unit
3.2. Slow sand filtration results
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References








 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.