Using local knowledge to model asymmetric preference formation in willingness to pay for environmental services

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.003Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper describes an approach to account for asymmetric preference formation in discrete choice models used for environmental valuation. The paper draws on data from a case study on preferences for environmental change resulting from a hypothetical rural development and conservation programme in Indonesia. Local knowledge on the current state of the environment was used to define an individual-specific status quo that consistently frames changes in a range of environmental services as gains or losses matching the perceptions of the local population living in the vicinity of a National Park. I estimated choice models that included separate parameters for increases and decreases in attribute levels for the environmental services and derived the indicators of local willingness to pay (WTP) corresponding to the bidirectional changes relative to the individual-specific status quo option.

I found clear evidence of an asymmetric response to increase and decrease in attribute levels relative to the status quo. Ignoring asymmetric preference formation can therefore result in biased estimates of WTP indicators and welfare measures of change in cases where the outcomes of environmental programmes can plausibly result in both an increase and a decrease relative to a reference option. Compared to a symmetrical modelling approach, the combination of simultaneously accounting for asymmetric preference formation and preference heterogeneity in the choice model yielded additional insights that may be used to inform the development of local strategies towards biodiversity conservation.

Introduction

Discrete choice models are widely used to estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for changes in the provision of environmental goods and services based on individual responses to a choice experiment (CE). Researchers using these models aim to predict choice behaviour for alternative future states of the environment that result from different management or policy decisions. Commonly, a number of management or policy choice options are offered in conjunction with a status quo option. The status quo option often reflects either the present situation regarding the environment or a predicted future change resulting from a business-as-usual scenario.

The status quo option serves as a reference base against the proposed environmental change and thus frames the changes in attributes as gains or losses relative to the base option. This can be understood in the context of prospect theory (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979), which posits responses to choices to be reference-dependent. Respondents would, as a result of a simplifying heuristic applied in the choice process, relate their decisions to a comparison with a neutral reference, thus framing choices as gains or losses (Tversky and Kahneman, 1981).

Recent evidence from stated choice applications to transportation research suggests that such ‘referencing’ matters in the decision-making process (Hensher, 2008, Hess et al., 2008, Hess and Rose, 2009). Hess et al. (2008) investigate if preferences for trip choice attributes differ for increases and decreases in attribute levels, relative to a reference option. Differences in preferences for increases and decreases would represent an asymmetric response to positive and negative deviations of attribute levels from a reference point. Hess et al. test whether respondents are equally responsive to increases or decreases in attributes such as road toll or trip cost relative to an individual-specific reference option reflecting respondents’ recent or current trip. They found asymmetrical response patterns, which suggest that preference formation in stated preference methods may be related to differences from an individually specified reference option, rather than the result of considering the actual absolute values the attributes takes. WTP estimates for gains or losses in attributes derived from the respective parameter estimates were found to differ and show asymmetries for some but not all of the attributes.

Drawing on data from a CE survey from Indonesia, in this paper I demonstrate an asymmetrical modelling approach. I estimated models that included separate parameters for both increases and decreases in attribute levels for a range of environmental services. The choice options in this study were framed as the outcomes of a public rural development and conservation programme in the buffer region of the Lore Lindu National Park in Central Sulawesi. Especially in early planning phases of such a programme, there can be a considerable degree of flexibility about the objectives, how to achieve them, and how to allocate resources to different programme components under budget constraints. For example, conservation and development objectives would have to be balanced amongst themselves, and against other development needs of the local population. It is therefore plausible that various policy options can result in both increases and decreases in the provision of different ecosystem services.

The approach to asymmetric modelling of responses to a CE follows the one suggested in Hess et al. (2008) but makes use of local knowledge on the environmental services. This knowledge is used to individually specify the status quo option that respondents use as a reference base to a subsequent choice task. This is, to my knowledge, a novel feature in the environmental economics literature. The attributes, for example water availability for paddy rice cultivation, were described in a way that related to the everyday experience of respondents. The use of local knowledge was motivated by a lack of reliable data on the supply of environmental services, together with observations that environmental conditions varied markedly within the Indonesian study area. Because of this approach, the estimates of marginal WTP for changes in attribute levels must be interpreted relative to a status quo option that differs among respondents.

This paper contributes to the emerging literature on asymmetric preference formation in stated preference techniques. The main objective of this paper is to raise awareness of the possibility of relating respondents’ experience to their stated choices, and to model responses to CEs as asymmetrical with environmental economists who use CEs. To my knowledge, this is the first application of an asymmetrical modelling approach in environmental choice modelling.

I compared model results of a symmetrical and an asymmetrical modelling approach. This allowed me to assess whether an asymmetrical approach would result in an improved understanding of respondents’ preferences for environmental services, and if WTP estimates would differ between the two modelling approaches. I also assessed whether differences in preferences for either increases or decreases in attribute levels existed.

Section snippets

Defining a status quo option

The specification of the status quo option is crucial for any approach that incorporates both gains and losses relative to a reference base. If the status quo option is defined as the current state of the world, attributes can be designed to reflect deviations in both directions from the status quo option. This excludes representations of the status quo as a future worst-case business-as-usual scenario that frames all choices as gains (e.g., Colombo et al., 2005, Hanley et al., 2006).

A status

Study background

The data used are drawn from a study carried out in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. This study elicited preferences for selected environmental services of inhabitants living in the vicinity of the Lore Lindu National Park (LLNP), which is one of the few large remaining mountainous rainforest areas on Sulawesi (Waltert et al., 2004). There were three general objectives of this study.

First, the Central Sulawesi rainforests in Indonesia are part of the global Wallacea biodiversity ‘hotspot’ (Myers

Econometric modelling approach

Stated choice methods have foundations in random utility theory (RUT, e.g. Manski, 1977, McFadden, 1974). According to RUT, the utility associated with alternative j out of a choice set Ci for individual i is partitioned into a deterministic, systematic and observed component Vij and a random part of utility ɛij:Uij=Vij+ɛijjCi

Observed utility Vij is a linear and additive function of the attributes and takes the following form for a symmetrical modelling approach, i.e. for an approach that

Results

With respect to the relevance of changes in attribute levels to household well-being, on average, water availability was perceived most important, followed by the preponderance of different shade management regimes in cocoa plantations, rattan availability in the forest and the size of anoa populations. Summary statistics for these variables can be found in Appendix 2.

Of a total of 326 respondents, 22 respondents were omitted because of ‘protest’, payment aversion, or because they had severe

Discussion

I successfully demonstrated the use of perception data for generating an individual-specific status quo option, which allows to model respondents’ choices consistently in terms of individually perceived gains or losses relative to the status quo. Having received some recent recognition in transportation research, this approach is novel to the environmental economics literature. I would like this paper to be conceived as a modest contribution to enriching the SP toolbox for environmental

Concluding remarks

I have demonstrated the potential for using an asymmetrical modelling approach in SP studies aimed at calculation of (local) WTP. In combination with a model that accounted for preference heterogeneity I obtained a more realistic picture of respondents’ preferences for a range of environmental services. It is hoped that these findings will motivate a more widespread application of asymmetric modelling approaches in SP studies for environmental valuation, especially because the informational

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and The Scottish Government Rural and Environment Research and Analysis Directorate (RERAD) for funding; the villagers of the Lore Lindu Region; the local research team; Jan Barkmann and Rainer Marggraf for research support;Stefan Schwarze and STORMA sub-project A4 for the provision of household data used in Supplemental Material A; Anke Fischer, George Dyer, Kerry Waylen and three anonymous reviewers for useful comments on earlier

References (54)

  • N. Hanley et al.

    Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive

    J. Environ. Manage.

    (2006)
  • D.A. Hensher et al.

    Development of commuter and non-commuter mode choice models for the assessment of new public transport infrastructure projects: a case study

    Transport Res. A-Pol.

    (2007)
  • S. Hess et al.

    Asymmetric preference formation in willingness to pay estimates in discrete choice models

    Transport. Res. E

    (2008)
  • J. Swait

    A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference choice data

    J. Retailing Consum. Serv.

    (1994)
  • J. Swait

    A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cut-offs

    Transport. Res. B-Meth.

    (2001)
  • J. Wielgus et al.

    Including risk in stated-preference economic valuations: experiments on choices for marine recreation

    J. Environ. Manage.

    (2009)
  • A. Balmford et al.

    Economic reasons for conserving wild nature

    Science

    (2002)
  • A. Baranzini et al.

    Feel It or Measure It. Perceived vs. Measured Noise in Hedonic Models

    (2006)
  • I. Bateman et al.

    Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques – A Manual

    (2002)
  • K.S. Bawa et al.

    Tropical ecosystems into the 21st Century

    Science

    (2004)
  • J. Belsky et al.

    Cultivating Cocoa: implications of sun-grown cocoa on local food security and environmental sustainability

    Agric. Human Values

    (2003)
  • L. Bennun et al.

    Monitoring important bird areas in Africa: towards a sustainable and scaleable system

    Biodivers. Conserv

    (2005)
  • P.C. Boxall et al.

    Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approach

    Environ. Resource Econ.

    (2002)
  • D.F. Calheiros et al.

    Participatory research methods in environmental science: local and scientific knowledge of a limnological phenomenon in the Pantanal wetland of Brazil

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2000)
  • S. Colombo et al.

    Designing policy for reducing the off-farm effects of soil erosion using choice experiments

    J. Agr. Econ.

    (2005)
  • S. Colombo et al.

    Modelling preference heterogeneity in stated choice data: an analysis for public goods generated by agriculture

    Agr. Econ.

    (2009)
  • F. Danielsen et al.

    Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches

    Biodivers. Conserv.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Dissonance and commute satisfaction: Which reference point to use?

      2021, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
    • Forest owners' preferences for contract-based management to enhance environmental values versus timber production

      2021, Forest Policy and Economics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Consistent with loss aversion (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979; Tversky and Kahneman, 1991), the findings suggest asymmetric preferences for improvements and deteriorations in the attributes describing the potential effects of forest management strategy on environmental values: the losses associated with a decline in the biodiversity and carbon storage attributes were more considerable than gains associated with an equivalent increase in the same attributes. Similar asymmetric findings have been made in the context of travel route choices (Hess et al., 2008), freight transport (Masiero and Hensher, 2010), rural development and conservation programmes (Glenk, 2011), and conditions of water quality (Ahtiainen et al., 2015). According to this result, a forest policy that prioritizes the protection of natural values in forests rich with natural values leads to more significant welfare gains for society than a policy that seeks to improve natural values in forests with few natural values (Ahtiainen et al., 2015).

    • Society's preferences when ecological values and health risks are at stake: An application to the population control of a flagship ungulate (Iberian ibex) in Sierra de Guadarrama national park, Spain

      2021, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      The analysis of the results also allows analyzing behavior differences between the main users of the national park (visitors) in two different contexts (when they are interviewed either at the park or outside the park), in addition to comparing their preferences with those of other citizens who have not visited the national park within the last year. Moreover, transversally, we will analyze how being more or less informed about the consequences of conducting a management program for the Iberian ibex in this national park could affect the decisions of individuals (Domínguez-Torreiro and Soliño, 2011; Glenk, 2011; Marsh et al., 2010). This latter information could be relevant with respect to designing programs to inform citizens about the Iberian ibex management plan carried out by the national park.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text